Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 天盈色聊(裂变)

Channel

天盈色聊(裂变)

@e_vip

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

210subscribers

+191 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004254208556
TypeChannel
Usernames@e_vip @Ty_sl
Created18 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held5
On Telegramt.me/e_vip

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19210114.519 September 2026 — 19 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19 subscribers2 October 2026 — 154 subscribers5 October 2026 — 210 subscribers5 October 2026 — 210 subscribers19 September 20265 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 16:22210no change
5 Oct 2026, 15:47210+56
2 Oct 2026, 02:58154+135
19 Sept 2026, 01:2219no change
19 Sept 2026, 00:4719first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.4%
avg views ÷ 210 subscribers
Avg views / post
156
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held21 (18 September 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total2,814
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
11
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC78 viewsread 5 October 2026

新币跑路最新动态,地址解冻信息被爆~ @o_vip @g_vip 最新福利,小白可做情趣快杀,一天300/800直接0成本扶持, @e_vip 群里有4000多位新币公群老板!真实有效

5 Oct 2026, 12:46 UTC93 viewsread 5 October 2026

https://t.me/+YqD-BoAZ9sA4MGU0 需要团饭的兄弟进群。广告帮你发起来。一会团饭

3 Oct 2026, 15:06 UTC210 viewsread 5 October 2026

有没有没事做的兄弟。帮你往群里拉人。飞机号有我提供。一会拉完人团个饭,有的直接私聊我 @s_vip 直接说团饭就行

2 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC655 viewsread 5 October 2026
Photo

天盈色聊➕有价值扶持,工作室扶持1000块钱每月,需要每天帮公司发3个飞机号,发私信,发到双向后算一个。需要听从公司统一安排,飞机号由公司提供。只要三组,能做的私聊我。另外高新聘请一个有凤楼资源的人才,自己能做频道的,享受公司整体利润分成,有的联系我 @s_vip

2 Oct 2026, 03:50 UTC220 viewsread 5 October 2026
Forwarded from @jrqpd1Photo

抽奖10个七天供需 第一名3条供需 第二名2条供需 第三名2条供需 第四名1条供需 第五名1条供需 第六名1条供需 要求拉真实用户,拉的人越多排名越搞,想要的拉人吧。只要真实用户3天内有效。后台可以看见都是谁拉的人,然后可以明确知道拉的人是不是真实用户。另外群内有效发言前5名,每月送5条天盈供需➕七天供需! 天盈宣传部 @s_vip

29 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTCviews —

天盈色聊(裂变) pinned «今天跟我说大哥我想做,我想赚钱,明天还是这句话,不无聊嘛,干个灰产你还怕这个怕那个的,你不组建团队你一个人两个人怎么出业绩,没有量怎么赚钱?团队是有团队的必要,设备会死。需要团队里有人要更新,我们主打的就是公司运营模式,你跟着做肯定比自己做赚钱,但是你要组团,没有人也可以帮你们组建,但是请认真对待这个工作,搞不搞都行的心态就别做!»

29 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC332 views0 reactionsread 5 October 2026

今天跟我说大哥我想做,我想赚钱,明天还是这句话,不无聊嘛,干个灰产你还怕这个怕那个的,你不组建团队你一个人两个人怎么出业绩,没有量怎么赚钱?团队是有团队的必要,设备会死。需要团队里有人要更新,我们主打的就是公司运营模式,你跟着做肯定比自己做赚钱,但是你要组团,没有人也可以帮你们组建,但是请认真对待这个工作,搞不搞都行的心态就别做!

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @e_vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“天盈色聊(裂变)” (@e_vip), 210 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_vip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.