3 measurements spanning 21 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 22:14
114
+2
9 Aug 2026, 06:33
112
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:01
112
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.0%
avg views ÷ 114 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
12 (24 April 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
147
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
119 reactions across 12 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5280650775624696368
12
10.1%
custom 5242539293129341045
10
8.40%
custom 5249287124838011051
8
6.72%
custom 5429344978658692353
8
6.72%
custom 5314427961808548693
7
5.88%
custom 5294435447391404201
6
5.04%
custom 5316660421384493663
6
5.04%
custom 5242205423846584623
5
4.20%
custom 5249481515057830305
5
4.20%
custom 5310169467374826673
5
4.20%
custom 5409261982165517100
5
4.20%
custom 5427391356949537376
5
4.20%
custom 5282893637611441038
4
3.36%
custom 5319086287632738551
4
3.36%
custom 5427338305513470691
3
2.52%
custom 5474211074616084257
3
2.52%
custom 5193172814475058313
2
1.68%
custom 5233488882208630441
2
1.68%
custom 5275970150330276315
2
1.68%
custom 5283212169565984830
2
1.68%
12 further kinds
15
12.6%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
71
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 12 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @e_4_h. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
- Parasite (2019)
المطر نفسه الذي كان بالنسبة للعائلة الفقيرة كارثة دمّرت بيتهم، كان بالنسبة للعائلة الغنية مجرد طقس جميل جعل الجو منعشًا. وهنا تكمن قسوة المشهد؛ الشيء نفسه يمكن أن يكون نعمة لشخص، ومأساة لشخص آخر.
شعور السائق وهو يسمع السيدة تتحدث عن المطر بكل أريحية، بينما هو يعرف جيدًا ماذا فعل هذا المطر بالفقراء. لا نرى غضبًا واضحًا، فقط صمتًا ونظرة تحمل شيئًا من المرارة.
وكأن المطر كشف الفرق بين عالمين يعيشان …
ما الذي فعله آرثر شوبنهاور بالوعي البشري؟
قبل مجيء شوبنهاور، كانت الفلسفة الغربية تعيش في وهم كبير؛ تزعم أن العقل البشري هو السيد والمحرك لكل شيء، وأن الكون يسير وفق خطة عقلانية منظمة. ما فعله شوبنهاور هو أنه قلب الطاولة على هذا الفكر، وجاء ليعلن أن "العقل" ليس سوى خادم مطيع، مجرد واجهة زجاجية تخفي خلفها المحرك الحقيقي والوحيد للوجود: قوة غاشمة وعمياء سماها "الإرادة".
1- هدم مركزية العقل البشري
فلسفة شوبنهاور قامت…
الوجودية Vs العبثية
في هذا المشهد يتم عرض التعقيد بعلاقة نيت وبريندا، مو فقط بينهم مشاكل في العلاقة، بل بينهم تناقض فكريًا، الموسم الاول نيت يحاول يصنع معنى لحياته، ف نيت شخصية وجودية بحت، بالنقيض بريندا، تقول بالحوار هذا بإن الحياة عشوائية، ونموت ونعيش ومايتغير شيء، حتى انها وصلت لمرحلة انها تتمنى لو انها ما انولدت، وفي الاخير تقول ليس لدي خيار، حوارها هو التعريف الكامل للعبثية، الإنسان يؤمن بعبث الحياة مع ذلك يواجه…
"Dad, today I made a plan."
It’s absolutely fucking absurd that Song Kang-Ho did not get any Oscar attention for his role in this film. He gives the most expressive, wide-ranging performance of the year. I mean, the entire ensemble is outstanding (I think I’ve already said how terrific Cho Yeo-jeong’s comedic performance is) but Song is the emotional center of this film both in its funniest and it’s most tragic momen…
sometimes I wish I knew how to love someone without slowly ruining everything because every relationship in my life seems to end the same way not because I didn't care but because I cared in a way that starts feeling heavy after a while it's like the more I love someone the more my mind starts needing proof that they still want me proof that I'm not about to be replaced proof that I'm not slowly becoming someone they…
- Six Feet Under E1S4(2001-2005)
"يقول نيتشه إن أخطر لحظة في حياة الإنسان ليست حين يتألم، بل حين يكتشف أن ما يحدث له لا يحمل بالضرورة أي معنى أعلى. هذا المشهد يمكن فهمه كترجمة بصرية لهذه الفكرة: لحظة يُجبر فيها الوعي على التخلي عن وهم أن الحياة "مرتّبة من الداخل". ما نراه ليس حدثاً حزيناً فقط، بل انكسار الإطار الذي كنا نفسّر به الواقع. فلسفياً، هذه لحظة سقوط السرد: حين يدرك الإنسان أن العالم لا يقدّم قصة جاهزة، وأن …
"Man is that being who is aware that he does not know. Ignorance is not merely a lack of knowledge it is part of our existence, where we face ambiguity, emptiness, and meaninglessness. When we try to grasp the world, we realize that we are confined within our inner horizon, and that the world is far greater and more complex than we can contain."
-Jean Paul Sartre
“You can’t take a picture of this. It’s already gone.”
هذه الجملة وحدها تلخص جل فلسفة العمل، باختصار الجملة تعبر عن خوف كبير من المستقبل وفقدانها للحاضر عبر هذه الجملة التي ترمز لاستحالة إيقاف الزمن أو اللحظة، وإن كان هذا يقودنا إلى شيء فهو يقودنا إلى طريقة طرح المسلسل لفكرة الموت على أنها ليست فاجعة صادمة بل حقيقة يومية، كما لا تستطيع إيقاف اللحظة، ولا تستطيع إيقاف الموت وكوننا نشاهد الموت باستغراب فهو مشكلتنا في ال…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @e_4_h. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nostalgia” (@e_4_h), 114 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_4_h.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
