Channel
@eXtinctionRebellion
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,973subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001370622227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eXtinctionRebellion |
| Created | 16 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eXtinctionRebellion |
Recorded in 2019 as “eXtinction Rebellion” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 1,973 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 1,972 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,975 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 1,976 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 1,977 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 1,977 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Within a week of the magnificent work of River Roding Trust volunteers completing the arduous work of restoring 250 metres of the Aldersbrook this winter, EA investigators had been down to the site and rattled off a letter threatening us with prosecution for doing the work without a permit. This is despite the fact that the Trust have repeatedly asked the EA to do this vital work on the Aldersbrook themselves & they …
🔥1🤣1
Chinese robot seen begging for money on street.
👀3🤬2😱2
The UK is drafting a law to scan every photo, video and message on every phone in the country. Tech CEOs who refuse to implement this could face up to 5 years in prison. The proposal would force companies to build device level scanners that inspect content before encryption. That means: • Every image scanned • Every message inspected • Every video analyzed All directly on your phone. https://reclaimthenet.org/u…
👎3😡1
The most powerful climate phenomenon on record could hit the US in 2026, experts warn. Scientists warn global phenomenon is primed to match catastrophic event that killed 50 million. According to the most recent forecasts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the probability of an El Niño – a periodic warming of the tropical Pacific that reshapes weather patterns across the globe – emergin…
Gene Editing Breakthrough in Human Embryos Sparks Ethical Alarm Scientists at Columbia University, led by Dr. Dieter Egli, have achieved the first precise base editing in human embryos, replacing individual DNA letters with high accuracy using advanced tools safer than traditional CRISPR. The study, using donated IVF embryos, targeted genes linked to health risks but produced mosaic outcomes—some cells edited, other…
Google/Alphabet is preparing to conduct one of the largest open-air biological experiments in U.S. history. Sixty-four million bacteria-infected mosquitoes are scheduled for release in Florida and California, which may potentially cause irreversible ecosystem disruptions. Key details of the proposal include: - Scale and Timeline: The release would occur over two years (potentially starting in 2027), with 32 million…
UK university spin-off pioneers new method to make green hydrogen from seawater Generating two pounds of hydrogen through electrolysis requires over eight gallons of freshwater, putting a serious strain on its availability.
😁2⚡1
Bill Gates' lab-made butter is expected to reach supermarket shelves by 2027. "It looks, smells, and tastes like the butter we're all familiar with, but without the farmland, fertilisers, or emissions." Bill Gates: "The idea of switching to lab-made fats and oils may seem strange at first, but their potential to significantly reduce our carbon footprint is immense." "This is really about how we feed our species an…
🤮2❤1👍1👏1🖕1
Attack on Iran’s oil released as much pollution as a volcano Airstrikes on Tehran earlier this year emitted a plume containing almost 30,000 tonnes of sulphur dioxide that reached Asian countries
❤1🎉1
AI drones are planting trees at a scale no human crew ever could. Imagine planting 120 seed pods per minute, 400,000 trees a day, and 70,000 hectares restored across 12+ countries. 150x faster than humans. 10x cheaper. The AI scans terrain and picks the optimal spot for each seed before it's fired into the ground with 0 guesswork and 0 wasted effort.
💯1🔥1
SpaceX put 10 megawatts of solar power in space across 3000 gen1 Starlink satellites, then they put 100 megawatts in space with 7000 gen2. soon, they're doing 1000 megawatts with gen3. SpaceX is basically 10xing space solar every few years! https://x.com/i/status/2059002244305973472
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @eXtinctionRebellion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,095,547 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eXtinction Rebellion • @eXtinctionRebellion • XR” (@eXtinctionRebellion), 1,973 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eXtinctionRebellion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.