Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

dwtruthwarrior ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

@dwtruthwarrior

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

6,436subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001352858583
TypeChannel
Username@dwtruthwarrior
Created12 January 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dwtruthwarrior

Growth

6,4366,4656,450.56 August 2026 โ€” 6,465 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 6,465 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 6,464 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 6,452 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 6,436 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,432โ€“6,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:036,436-16
9 Aug 2026, 12:416,452-12
6 Aug 2026, 14:286,464-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:306,465no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:506,465first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 November 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 09s
Average length
2m 03s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

1,792 reactions across 20 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ’ฏ42423.7%
โค30016.7%
๐Ÿ‘28115.7%
๐Ÿ”ฅ23313.0%
๐Ÿ˜1216.75%
๐Ÿคก744.13%
๐ŸŽ‰472.62%
๐Ÿ™341.90%
โšก331.84%
๐Ÿ’”311.73%
๐Ÿคฃ291.62%
๐Ÿ‘251.40%
๐Ÿคฎ231.28%
๐Ÿ˜ข221.23%
๐Ÿค”181.00%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ150.837%
๐Ÿ˜ญ150.837%
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€90.502%
๐Ÿ˜Ž80.446%
๐Ÿคช70.391%
16 further kinds432.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,792reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2024 to 30 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Nov 2024, 19:28 UTCโ‰ˆ10,900 views176 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Epic statement from the great C.S. Lewis

โค105๐Ÿ”ฅ34โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ12๐Ÿ’ฏ12๐Ÿ‘8โšก3๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿ™1

29 Nov 2024, 18:16 UTCโ‰ˆ9,170 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐ŸŽ‰47๐Ÿ”ฅ32๐Ÿ’ฏ22๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ™4โค2

29 Nov 2024, 18:01 UTCโ‰ˆ8,520 views115 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘47๐Ÿ’ฏ37๐Ÿ˜14๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿค“6โค3๐Ÿ˜ฑ1

28 Nov 2024, 21:09 UTCโ‰ˆ7,000 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://dwtruthwarrior.substack.com/p/above-all-dont-lie-to-yourself

โค29โšก8๐Ÿ’ฏ6๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ”ฅ1

28 Nov 2024, 15:37 UTCโ‰ˆ7,150 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

You canโ€™t unsee this.

๐Ÿ’ฏ78๐Ÿ‘44๐Ÿคฃ13๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿค”4๐Ÿ‘1

27 Nov 2024, 18:40 UTCโ‰ˆ5,370 views114 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

All the psychologists alive in the world today couldnโ€™t put their heads together to write something as true and profound as this single paragraph from Dostoevsky.

๐Ÿ”ฅ54๐Ÿ’ฏ38โค16๐Ÿ‘4โšก1๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚1

27 Nov 2024, 02:35 UTCโ‰ˆ4,260 views132 reactionsread 12 August 2026

โ€œLockdowns were an enormous & catastrophic mistake.. We should recoil with horror.. Covid policies violated medical ethics & crushed ability for physicians/scientists to discuss facts/evidence.. many silenced" - Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Trumps new NIH director

๐Ÿ‘57๐Ÿ’ฏ42๐Ÿ‘18โค11๐Ÿค”3๐Ÿ™1

24 Nov 2024, 04:29 UTCโ‰ˆ4,560 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜70๐Ÿ˜ญ15๐Ÿคฃ13๐Ÿ‘5โšก4โค4๐Ÿ†4๐Ÿ”ฅ1

24 Nov 2024, 04:26 UTCโ‰ˆ3,870 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

So yeahโ€ฆthis was taken right as Montreal was being mostly peacefulled. Whatโ€™s up with all the bracelets thoughโ€ฆ

๐Ÿคก43๐Ÿคฎ22๐Ÿคช7๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€4๐Ÿ–•2๐Ÿฆ„2๐Ÿ‘1

24 Nov 2024, 03:01 UTCโ‰ˆ3,840 views114 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#WW3 was always the final backup plan of the power hungry control freak totalists if everything else failed in achieving their little fucked up technocratic global concentration camp. If we are truly at the doorstep of this long predicted conflict, and we see these minions doing everything in their power to kick this war off rather than prevent it, and this is happening right as all the wheels are coming off for thesโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ’ฏ68๐Ÿ”ฅ21๐Ÿ˜Ž8โค7๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘Œ2

23 Nov 2024, 17:02 UTCโ‰ˆ3,390 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026

A head full of fears has no space for dreams.

๐Ÿ’ฏ64โค24๐Ÿ‘6โšก2๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿคฏ1

22 Nov 2024, 08:13 UTCโ‰ˆ3,620 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ™26๐Ÿ‘17โค6๐Ÿ’ฏ5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3โšก2๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dwtruthwarrior. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 142,092 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œdwtruthwarrior ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆโ€ (@dwtruthwarrior), 6,436 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dwtruthwarrior.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.