Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Open class; Dwalesy.

@dwalesy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,398subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788574961
TypeChannel
Username@dwalesy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dwalesy

Growth

11,39811,43611,4177 August 2026 — 11,436 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,436 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,434 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,419 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,412 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,410 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,401 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,398 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,392–11,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:3611,398-3
12 Aug 2026, 08:0811,401-9
11 Aug 2026, 11:1311,410-2
10 Aug 2026, 09:4311,412-7
9 Aug 2026, 08:4111,419-15
8 Aug 2026, 06:5711,434-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:0111,436no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:5811,436first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6870.1%
🔥1212.4%
🥰77.22%
🎉66.19%
🏆33.09%
💋11.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jun 2026, 04:34 UTC≈1,350 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hello dwals!! maaf admin baru online, chat nya dibales dari bawah yaaa. btw kita masih open tapi mohon maaf nanti balesnya agak lama. 😔🙏

17🥰7🔥6

24 May 2026, 03:45 UTC≈2,020 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @KithChatte

[HFW] Halo temen-temen, kami ingin menginformasikan bahwa mari bersama-sama untuk unsubs dan boikot material (khususnya material manips) dari @Fontato. Sebab channel tersebut mengambil material ekslusif dari beberapa pihak seperti Everclass serta beberapa class lainnya, shamyse, KithChatte dan pihak lainnya yang dirugikan, untuk dijadikan freebies. Proof ada di comsect https://t.me/Everclass/1393 dan @spillfontato

5🏆3

10 May 2026, 04:57 UTC≈2,710 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

sorry for late respon nya temen-temen, sudah di balas dari bawah ya. btw kita masih open okeee.

7

25 Apr 2026, 11:25 UTC≈3,290 viewsread 13 August 2026

masih open guysss, maaf kalau agak slow respon yaa karena admin juga banyak yang sibuk :>

1 Apr 2026, 08:14 UTC≈4,160 viewsread 13 August 2026

Masih open nih yuk send format nya, masih fast respon juga nih

30 Mar 2026, 04:31 UTC≈4,160 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Guyss yang mau join class masih open yaa, sudah lumayan fast respon nih. <3

14

22 Jan 2026, 07:42 UTC≈6,740 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Guysss yang kirim format tolong rechat yaa (kalau emg jadi/gak clear chat) soalnya ada bbrp yang masuk notif tapi pas buka gaadaa.

1

10 Jan 2026, 08:28 UTC≈6,730 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Guyss masih open yaaaa pakai pl iniii! Tp maaf kalau slow respon. <3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dwalesy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 237,444 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Open class; Dwalesy.” (@dwalesy), 11,398 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dwalesy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.