Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДВИ МГИМО | ЛЕВЕР

Channel

ДВИ МГИМО | ЛЕВЕР

@dvi_lever

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

379subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002330637709
TypeChannel
Username@dvi_lever
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dvi_lever

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3793893847 August 2026 — 388 subscribers8 August 2026 — 388 subscribers8 August 2026 — 389 subscribers16 August 2026 — 388 subscribers24 August 2026 — 386 subscribers31 August 2026 — 385 subscribers9 September 2026 — 386 subscribers16 September 2026 — 388 subscribers29 September 2026 — 383 subscribers9 October 2026 — 379 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 63 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 23:20379-4
29 Sept 2026, 02:36383-5
16 Sept 2026, 01:20388+2
9 Sept 2026, 04:35386+1
31 Aug 2026, 04:28385-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:32386-2
16 Aug 2026, 21:38388-1
8 Aug 2026, 20:52389+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:03388no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:45388first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

294 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24784.0%
🔥206.80%
🤩124.08%
👍72.38%
❤‍🔥31.02%
👌31.02%
💯10.34%
🤯10.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC190 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет! Прошла на бюджет МП, сегодня отнесла доки))

❤16

1 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC222 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Поздравим Даниеллу с поступлением 💗

❤13

1 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC223 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Максим , привет ! Поступила на МО-МО. Только что вышла из вуза, относила оригиналы Спасибо тебе большое за твой курс! Если бы не он, то я бы не поступила в вуз мечты ❤️спасибо за всё!

❤20

28 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC317 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня прямо созвездие поступашек)

❤15🤩2

28 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC298 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет. Позвонили из МП, позвали на бюджет. Большое спасибо за твою работу 🙂🤝

❤12

28 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC297 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Первые поступашки этого года 🥹🤍

❤25

20 Jul 2026, 21:09 UTC423 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наблюдаем интересную тенденцию: чем выше балл ДВИ, тем больше недовольства собой у студентов 😅

❤12

20 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC382 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ ⚡️ ⚡️ Появились результаты ДВИ МГИМО abiturient.mgimo.ru/bakalavriat/result2026

❤6👌1🤩1

16 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC480 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как вам сложность ДВИ в этом году?

  1. 1-22%
  2. 3-42%
  3. 5-615%
  4. 7-838%
  5. 9-1017%
  6. Сдаю в следующем году33%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dvi_lever. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTCAnonymous Poll87 voters

Как вам сложность ДВИ в этом году?

  1. 1-22%
  2. 3-42%
  3. 5-615%
  4. 7-838%
  5. 9-1017%
  6. Сдаю в следующем году33%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДВИ МГИМО | ЛЕВЕР” (@dvi_lever), 379 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dvi_lever.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.