Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘷𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦

Channel

𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘷𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦

@dvestimivmeste6

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002345458890
TypeChannel
Username@dvestimivmeste6
Created1 October 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dvestimivmeste6

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

367406386.58 August 2026 — 406 subscribers8 August 2026 — 406 subscribers8 August 2026 — 405 subscribers16 August 2026 — 396 subscribers24 August 2026 — 390 subscribers30 August 2026 — 385 subscribers9 September 2026 — 375 subscribers17 September 2026 — 367 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 40 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 361–412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:54367-8
9 Sept 2026, 23:21375-10
30 Aug 2026, 20:28385-5
24 Aug 2026, 06:34390-6
16 Aug 2026, 19:58396-9
8 Aug 2026, 20:54405-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:15406no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:05406first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 1 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 57986727941494602551632.7%
custom 52381105032423325571530.6%
custom 53552911396561469241428.6%
custom 535504148179716645848.16%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2024 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC63 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53552911396561469245custom 52381105032423325572custom 57986727941494602552

8 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC99 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52381105032423325574custom 53550414817971664584custom 57986727941494602554

7 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC108 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52381105032423325573custom 53552911396561469243custom 57986727941494602553

3 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC156 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5️⃣

custom 57986727941494602557custom 52381105032423325576custom 53552911396561469246

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @dvestimivmeste6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘷𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦” (@dvestimivmeste6), 367 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dvestimivmeste6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.