Channel
@dv7crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,002subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001269676673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dv7crypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dv7crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 2,002 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 2,006 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 2,007 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 2,008 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 2,011 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,011 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
104 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 28 | 26.9% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 14.4% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 6.73% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 5.77% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кстати, с момента последнего поста прошло 2 месяца, на рынке ничего не поменялось. Надеюсь вы не сидели и молились на графики в надежде на альтсезон, а продвигались в других направлениях. По личному опыту скажу, что можно было реально успеть неплохо так продвинуться. Но если что, никогда не поздно. Поздно никогда. Пусть памп крипты станет для вас приятным бонусом, а не единственной лошадкой, на которой вся ставка 🙌
❤10🤝3👍1
👋 Оффтопчик: ищем проекты под трафик на бинарку/покет/фх. Есть связка по трафику по гуд цене, которую хотим масштабировать. Пишите обсудим @Valerievich7
Здарова, криптаны! Надеюсь все уже успели найти работу или хотя бы вакансии разослали 🤝 Если серьезно, то сейчас самое время перестать дрочить в крипто-чатах, сфокусироваться на направлениях вне рынка крипты, зарабатывать бабки и скупать тир1 щитки за бесценок, пока у криптанов уже пустые карманы. План прост: 🥲Будет ядерка и 3 мировая - хер уже с этой криптой 😇Не будет ядерки и мировой - рано или поздно крипту пам…
😁15🔥6🐳1😭1
Лучший мем что видел за последнее время 😅
😁12
Ребят, всем привет. Пока рынок тухлый, делать особо нечего на нем - занимаюсь в основном развитием направлений вне рынка. Одно из направлений - это обмен чистых грн с ФОП на USDT. У нас есть поток белых денег с инфобизнеса на украинских ФОПах, которые системно нужно менять на USDT. Если вам системно нужно отдавать USDT и заводить себе чистые гривны на ФОП и вы не хотите работать с непонятными деньгами из P2P - то…
Быстро, стоп в бу кидаю и можно спать спокойно
❤3
Вернулся в лонг по 89.3к, должно ехать
❤1👍1
Закрыл фулл лонг по 90, ТВХ была 90.5. Буду пробовать перезаходить ниже, сидеть с такой ТВХ далее не комфортно. Не думаю что без манипуляции со снижением продолжится рост и дальше. Но посмотрим, в любом случае уже ничего не потеряю
❤4🥴2👍1
Плохая была идея все таки, возвращаю лонг позу обратно, но ТВХ ухудшилось с 88к до 90.5к. Сперва улучшил с 94к до 88, теперь чуть откатил, бывает, но гипотеза того стоила думаю
👍3
Ну и желательно BTC вниз, альта вверх. Сатоши, просыпайся уже 😅
Чтобы было еще интереснее, беру небольшой прям шорт (0.5 риска) с текущих 84700$ и ставлю стоп за 86.500$. Полноценную позу не буду грузить сюда, так как оч гипотеза не стандартная, но чтобы интереснее было хочу поучаствовать в движении.
🤝3❤1
Делаю сейчас нестандартную манипуляцию по лонгу BTC. Напомню у меня ТВХ сейчас чуть меньше 88к. Естественно после 80к она уже далеко не комфортная. Смотрю на график и понимаю что сейчас дают возможность набрать людям новые лонги, ведь каждый видит, что падение уже за пределами адекватного. Это и на всех индикаторах и в целом на уровне ощущений. Поэтому сделаю ставку на то, что перед отскоком полноценным сделают еще…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dv7crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 424,422 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дэн Валерьевич | CRYPTO” (@dv7crypto), 2,002 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dv7crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.