Слоняра
custom 54043370677212365001

Channel
@dushnyi_gopher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002279470435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dushnyi_gopher |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dushnyi_gopher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 59 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 60 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404337067721236500 | 24 | 61.5% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.56% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Слоняра
custom 54043370677212365001
Блатуем
Что то тут не так 🤔
Кажется, не я один заметил, что Клод стал тупее. Девелоперша из AMD проанализировала 6,852 сессии Claude Code: 17,871 блоков размышлений, 234,760 вызовов тулов, 3 месяца логов. Картина неприятная. Глубина reasoning упала на 67% (с ~2200 до ~600 символов). Read:Edit ratio упал с 6.6 до 2.0, то есть модель перестала нормально изучать код перед правками. Треть эдитов делается вообще без чтения файла. Пользовательские п…
Пора выбирать новую профессию, пацаны! 🕰
custom 54043370677212365002
Video, posted without a caption
Подходит конец конфы, сразу перейду к тому, что понравилось, а что нет. Cons: всё в целом ок, но часть докладов совсем не зашла. Больше всего разочаровал блокчейн-доклад — очень слабый, особенно учитывая ожидания. Некоторые выступления вообще не тянут на заявленную тему «нестандартного Go» — обычные задачки типа оптимизации работы клиента к ин мемори бд. Лекция про софт-скиллы тоже мимо: почти не было конкретики о т…
custom 54043370677212365003
Началась прикольная конференция по Go Podlodka crew про "нестандартный го", я не выступаю, естественно 😭, но выступает мой бывший ментор из Авито и просто хороший человек, Никита Русин. Вечером будет доклад про Go в блокчейне, оч советую всем, кто интересуется темой и хотел бы подрасти с крудового бекенда во что-то более интересное. Стоимость вроде около 5к рублей, по промокоду можно чутка дешевле. Промокод nikitar…
custom 54043370677212365002
Вышла гошечка 1.25 Из прикольных и важных фичей, на мой взгляд, которые хочется попробовать вот уже совсем скоро на проде - Доступен новый экспериментальный сборщик мусора. Его дизайн улучшает производительность маркировки и сканирования мелких объектов за счёт лучшей локальности и масштабируемости по CPU. Результаты бенчмарков различаются, но мы ожидаем снижения накладных расходов GC на 10–40% в реальных программах…
custom 54043370677212365003
Получился такой опрос на внимательность - никто не ответил Delayed Initialization, хотя это тоже валидный термин так-то. Думаю, на днях соберусь с мыслями и напишу пост про DI-контейнеры, как они влияют на стартап приложения и позволяют использовать отложенную инициализацию.
custom 54043370677212365004
Что такое DI? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dushnyi_gopher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что такое DI? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая ваша конечная цель как программиста?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Душный гофер” (@dushnyi_gopher), 59 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dushnyi_gopher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.