Это нам за то, что не молимся! Снова рубрика "а нет, не показалось". Южнокорейский бренд Scentseum. На самом деле, по-моему, довольно прикольно. #душной_всратые флаконы
🤣15🔥3❤2

Channel
@dushnoi_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,367subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001822564190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dushnoi_channel |
| Created | 29 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dushnoi_channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,367 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 1,368 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 1,370 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 1,373 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 1,373 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (19 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,195 |
| Reactions total | 284 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
284 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 124 | 43.7% | |
| 🤣 | 75 | 26.4% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 14.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 6.34% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 3.17% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 2.82% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 2.46% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.704% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это нам за то, что не молимся! Снова рубрика "а нет, не показалось". Южнокорейский бренд Scentseum. На самом деле, по-моему, довольно прикольно. #душной_всратые флаконы
🤣15🔥3❤2
🤡 Друзья, сегодня первого августа отмечается наш профессиональный праздник — день клоуна 🤡 Солидные господа в цилиндре и монокле в белых пОльтах, кто ни разу не повёл себя как распоследний шут, пейте дальше вашу кофию, демонстративно отклячив мизинчик, а мы продолжаем. По сему поводу предлагаю лёгонько ознакомиться с душками, так или иначе затрагивающими тему цирка и клоунов — цветастая эстетика, опилки с арены, са…
❤14🤣7🔥3❤🔥1
Показалось. А нет, не показалось. #душной_всратые_флаконы
🤣18❤4😭2
➖ Зачем нужны нестойкие духи? О, если бы всякий раз, когда я слышала жалобы на стойкость у какого-то парфюма, мне давали по доллару! Этот плач, пожалуй, будет вечным, даже когда изобретут полностью несмываемую нелетучую формулу. Надеюсь, что не изобретут или я к тому времени помру. У меня, право, столько вопросов к этим жалобам. Начиная с практического "а стойкие это сколько именно часов, с какой поверхности и в ка…
❤13🔥5🫡3❤🔥1
Мне. Это. Надо. Да, это флакон-рыбка! Бренд House of Atropa из Грузии, и все флаконы у них такие нишево-причудливые, мне дико нравится! Да и сами ароматы выглядят заманчиво. Вот, например, ежевика и белая акация. Из-за дизайнерских бутылок стоимость душков негуманная, но понимаемая.
❤13🥰7🔥4
Вынесла свои любимые ✨летние✨ духи на фотосешн с риском уронить флаконы на камни, чтобы рассказать вам про них! Как видно, многие из представителей основательно отполовинены, что свидетельствует о степени фаворитизма XD. Летом (как и круглый год) я ношу, в целом, всё, но таки чаще рука тянется к чему-то цитрусовому, зелёному и свежему, а некоторый парфюмы просто прочно заякорились на теплую погоду — в большой колле…
❤22🦄5🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
🤣24❤7🦄2🫡2
Узнала сегодня новый термин — бишизм (Bisch-ism). От фамилии, пожалуй, популярнейшего на текущий момент парфюмера Квентина Биша. Это культура чрезмерно ярких, бесконечно стойких и оглушающе орущих ароматов. Культура, где ниша стала новым массом, что такое "амбродеревяшки" выучили уже почти все, а копию какой-нибудь Молекулы можно купить на любом рынке. Культура соревнований, кто кого перекричит духами и чей шлейф уб…
❤20❤🔥7🤣6
Непарфюмерное, но, возможно, кому-то пригодится. Олды тут? Знааааю, что тут! Если вы помните фруктовый чай Пиквик и его потрясающую рекламу из 90-х, то я вот случайно наткнулась на копеечный Майский чай, который мне показался довольно похожим. Когда я сунула нос в коробку с пакетиками, безотказно сработала ольфакторная память (так называемый Феномен Пруста) и меня мгновенно перенесло в детство — как я покупала в ун…
❤23🫡3🥰2
Духовные мемы с участием животных! Сразу видно, кого я люблю больше всего XD. На самом деле мемов с живтоне намного больше, все не поместились, покладу в комменты. #душной_мемы
🔥23❤🔥9❤6🤣5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dushnoi_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мама я надушилась” (@dushnoi_channel), 1,367 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dushnoi_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.