Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dushka

Channel

Dushka

@dushkasew

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

169subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001823527315
TypeChannel
Username@dushkasew
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dushkasew

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1671691687 August 2026 — 167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 167 subscribers15 August 2026 — 168 subscribers30 August 2026 — 169 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 21:53169+1
15 Aug 2026, 16:05168+1
8 Aug 2026, 15:32167no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:34167first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4240.8%
👍1514.6%
🔥1413.6%
❤1110.7%
🐳98.74%
👾76.80%
😍21.94%
😁10.971%
🙈10.971%
🤔10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 13 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2025, 08:04 UTC285 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подумала, что лета остается все меньше😬😢🙈 Как шутит наш «креативнейший директор»: не важно сколько тебе лет, все равно в августе появляется ощущение, что скоро в школу😂 А этим шортикам время года не важно, ведь они отшиты для спорзала😎

❤‍🔥6🔥4❤2🐳2👍2👾1

4 Aug 2025, 10:24 UTC289 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Решила я недели 3 назад отшить себе легкую рубашку с коротким рукавом, жарко думаю…. В общем, сегодня я ее впервые выгуливаю🤣 на улице дождь и 20 градусов🤭 это еще хорошо, что на календаре август😂 А вот ткань мне очень понравилась - хлопок крэш (эффект мятости), приятный и на теле и в работе🤓 обязательно будем из него шить в будущем летние и домашние вещи😎

👍9🔥3❤2🐳2👾1😁1

27 Jul 2025, 13:40 UTC305 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что-то давненько ничего не выкладывала. Лето🤷‍♀️ тут только понять и простить😂 В наличии женские трусики-хипстеры (шортики), повтора пока не будет, т.к. срок поступления данной кулирки не известен🤷‍♀️ Размеры от 42, 44, 46, 48. Стоимость 1500₽

❤‍🔥4🐳1👾1🔥1

9 Jul 2025, 14:37 UTC348 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Принт, конечно, пушка-бомба 🥰 А какой он объемный и детальный🤗 В общем, я довольна😊 и самое главное, что купона прям тютелька в тютельку хватило, словно его нарезали именно для этой футболки😂 или это мой глаз - алмаз идеальную модель футболки для него выбрал😂😉

❤‍🔥13🔥4😍2🐳1👾1

7 Jul 2025, 09:29 UTC288 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коноплянная джинса… первый опыт работы с такой тканью и весьма удачный🤓 Широкие джинсы-джоггеры с боковыми карманами + панама уже уехали к заказчику. Кстати, панама из джинсы теперь моя 🫶 но это, конечно, не летний вариант🙈 Вообще, удивительно, но факт, панама в пошиве очень трудозатратна, а потому совсем не дешевая в пошиве вещь🤷‍♀️

❤‍🔥7👍3🔥2🐳1👾1🤔1

23 Jun 2025, 16:42 UTC328 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В пятницу были с подругой на необычном (во всяком случае для меня) мероприятии - мастер-классе стилиста @style_anastasia по созданию летней капсулы гардероба. Я вообще из тех людей, которые считают, что, если ты после прочтения книги, узнал хоть что-то новое, то книга хороша. Итак! На мастер-классе я узнала, что я - гамин, так что сами понимаете, это было познавательное мероприятие😂 замечу, что раньше я и слова-то т…

❤6❤‍🔥3🐳1👾1🙈1

19 Jun 2025, 15:23 UTC294 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Шортиковый бум в самом разгаре🤗 Пошла я позавчера бровушки причесать/покрасить, в какой-то момент смотрю на косметолога, а у нее тоже краска на бровях уже, на мой вопросительный взгляд, она отвечает, мол я уже разошлась, да и не пропадать ведь хне😂 Вот и я разошлась с шортиками и уже отшила их гору, а заодно и себе 3🤓 сейчас вот сижу креативному директору нашему шортики в зал из спортивного трикотажа дошиваю😂 в общем…

❤‍🔥9❤1🐳1👍1👾1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @dushkasew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dushka” (@dushkasew), 169 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dushkasew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.