2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
58
no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:31
58
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 10 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
24
Videos
8
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
117 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5436325713558930154
53
45.3%
custom 5435854568531462710
18
15.4%
custom 5436168650899885008
16
13.7%
❤
11
9.40%
custom 5438370195301234257
6
5.13%
custom 5253730848326321928
5
4.27%
🎉
4
3.42%
👍
2
1.71%
🔥
2
1.71%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
МОЛОДОЖЁНЫ,
ВАЖНОЕ
НАПОМИНАНИЕ! 📝
Если ты готовишься к свадьбе и работаешь, то у тебя есть законное право на отпуск. Целых 5 дней!
Но есть нюансы...
Вот что нужно знать:
По ст. 128 ТК РФ работодатель обязан дать тебе до 5 дней отпуска в связи с регистрацией брака: даже без отработанного стажа и даже на испытательном сроке.
🖇️Этот отпуск не вычитается из твоего
обычного отпуска, а является дополнительным, при этом …
«Жизнь — это вспышки. Я собираю самые яркие»
Кульминация уютного свадебного вечера Константина и Марии 🤍 с персональной подачей нежнейшего торта от кондитера
Мечтайте МАСШТАБНО — остальное сделаю я!
«Пудровый — не значит скучный»
Смотрите, как мы оживили этот нежный оттенок
Оформление уютного свадебного вечера для самых близких
Пыльные розы, горький шоколад, капелька золота в свечах…♥️
Доброе пятничное утро! ☕️
Бодримся, наполняется и готовимся к следующему свадебному сезону 🩶
Мы знаем, как порой молодым трудно сделать выбор, понять, какое они хотят торжество, со временем теряешься в сотнях вариантах и уже не хочется ни че го 😅
Поэтому мы решили подготовить любимые многими ПАКЕТНЫЕ ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЯ для свадеб! 🧚🏼♀️
Они будут рассчитаны на разный бюджет и на разную тематику
Совсем скоро мы презенту…
Свадьба, на которой мы узнали, что врачи очень даже веселые люди 😁🤭
Прекрасные, искренние Глеб и Виктория 🩶
Организация: @dusha_event_
Ведущий: @timanov_event
Зеркальные зайки: @red_rabbit_show
Тех. обеспечение: @mta_rnd
Оформление: @orchid_flowers_ru
Фото: @jury_pakkert_photo
❤11🎉4👍2🔥2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dushaevent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 651,771 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@dushaevent named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dusha_event_ named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@jury_pakkert_photo named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@red_rabbit_show named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@timanov_event named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДУША l о Свадьбах и не только” (@dushaevent), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dushaevent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
