Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DuplyFi Reviews

Channel

DuplyFi Reviews

@duplyfiReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003892457055
TypeChannel
Username@duplyfiReviews
DescriptionChannel for reviews from our @duplyfi users. Sign up: Duplyfi.com
Created8 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/duplyfiReviews

Growth

510 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:015no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:465first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 16:19 UTC26 viewsread 13 August 2026

Vouch: DuplyFi is very profitable software, i could scale my models content across 25 accounts, thanks!

12 May 2026, 20:25 UTC37 viewsread 13 August 2026

lowkey didn’t expect much when i bought @DuplyFi but it surprised me. accounts that were barely moving started getting views again after using the repurposed vids from it

12 May 2026, 20:22 UTC37 viewsread 13 August 2026

Biggest vouch possible for DuplyFi uploads look completely original and engagement has gone crazy since switching. Running multiple fresh accounts daily with no bans, no flags and no action blocks.

12 May 2026, 20:21 UTC37 viewsread 13 August 2026

Honest review for @duplyfi this software makes scaling content insanely easy. Pumping out tons of reels every day while avoiding detection systems on TikTok, Instagram and Reddit with no issues at all, thanks a lot guys you're the best.

12 May 2026, 20:19 UTC37 viewsread 13 August 2026

Been using @duplyfi for a few weeks now and honestly nothing else compares, I was using TikFusion and couple more softwares before this and I was getting locked a lot because they can't compare with this one. Making bulk reels in minutes, bypassing platform detections easily and keeping accounts warmed with zero problems. Best investment for OFM/content automation!

12 May 2026, 20:14 UTC36 viewsread 13 August 2026

Huge vouch for @duplyfi , easily the most powerful repurposing software out right now. Been pushing hundreds of reels daily across instagram & tiktok and fresh accounts stay completely clean, no shadowbans, no locks, no detection issues at all.

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @duplyfiReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DuplyFi Reviews” (@duplyfiReviews), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duplyfiReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.