Channel
@duplo_belochki1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004488005204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @duplo_belochki1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 10 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/duplo_belochki1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 14 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 13 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 14 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 13 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5422787989526841155 | 13 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5429424950949727960 | 9 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5429393460249510214 | 8 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5422372739203763565 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 10.0% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.00% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ребяточки,простите,что мало постов,интернета нету,я вас всех люблю,спокойной ночки 🌷🤍
custom 54223727392037635651custom 54227879895268411551custom 54293934602495102141custom 54294249509497279601
#tiktok #straykids#jisung сладости
custom 54227879895268411551
#tiktok #straykids #minho ахуееееть
минсонов вам на ночь! всем спокойной ночки ❤️🤍
custom 54227879895268411551
Пойду что нибудь порисую
Ладно, анончик пока всё
Пупупу. Ну я девочка😅 Вам такого хватит?
custom 54227879895268411551
Откачка была Коротко и ясно😌
👀1custom 54223727392037635651custom 54227879895268411551custom 54294249509497279601
Сенкью вери мач
☃1🐳1custom 54223727392037635651custom 54293934602495102141
Да, я сам делаю обложки каких либо каналов, или могу взять с пинта Но эту делал сам
🐳1custom 54227879895268411551custom 54293934602495102141custom 54294249509497279601
Чисто по секрету всему все лето 25 я отходил с Минхо и до этого лета с Чаном
custom 54227879895268411552
Я сначало как увидел Джисона именно впервые в клипе или не помню в скз код вроде. У меня кровь из носа потоком шла. Он был просто ахуеный Но потом я переключился на минхо 😅
custom 54227879895268411552🆒1custom 54223727392037635651custom 54294249509497279601
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @duplo_belochki1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“<3little squirrel Jisung°🐿” (@duplo_belochki1), 14 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duplo_belochki1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.