Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🪄UFC fight predictions | Conductor MMA🔬

@dumskaya_net

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,481subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001688552401
TypeChannel
Username@dumskaya_net
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dumskaya_net

Growth

1,4771,4821,479.56 August 2026 — 1,477 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,477 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,478 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,482 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,481 subscribers1,4816 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,476–1,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:071,481-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:171,482+4
6 Aug 2026, 17:381,478+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:461,477no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:321,477first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Mar 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸Max Holloway (-168)🇺🇸 vs 🇧🇷Charles Oliveira (+225)🇧🇷 Wrestling - Oliveira Striking - Holloway Endurance - Holloway Opposition - parity Impact force - Oliveira Fighting IQ - parity Wear and Tear - Oliveira BJJ and Grappling - Oliveira Anthropometry - Oliveira Mental component - Holloway 📈 Probability of winning: (68 vs 32🔣 for Holloway) 📉

5 Mar 2026, 04:19 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇷Caio Borralho (-310)🇧🇷 vs 🇳🇱Reinier de Ridder (+230)🇳🇱 Wrestling - parity Striking - Borralho Endurance - Borralho Opposition - parity Impact force - parity Fighting IQ - parity Wear and Tear - parity BJJ and Grappling - de Ridder Anthropometry - de Ridder Mental component - Borralho 📈 Probability of winning: (75 vs 25🔣 for Borralho) 📉

22 Feb 2026, 04:23 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The result of the fight: 🔼Strickland's victory by TKO 🔼

15 Feb 2026, 00:56 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸Sean Strickland (+230)🇺🇸 vs 🇺🇸Anthony Hernandez (-310) 🇺🇸 Wrestling - Hernandez Striking - Strickland Endurance - Hernandez Opposition - Strickland Impact force - parity Fighting IQ - parity Wear and Tear - parity BJJ and Grappling - Hernandez Anthropometry - Strickland Mental component - parity 📈 Probability of winning: (60🔣vs 40🔣for H

11 Dec 2025, 11:22 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The result of the fight: 🥊Yan's victory by unanimous decision🥊 49-46 x 3 for Yan | Official scorecards 49-46 x 3 for Yan | By Conductor MMA 1) 10-9 2) 10-9 3) 9-10 4) 10-9 5) 10-9

11 Dec 2025, 11:20 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The result of the fight: 🦴 Van's victory by TKO 🦴

11 Dec 2025, 11:19 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The result of the fight: 🕔 Taira's victory by TKO 🕔

11 Dec 2025, 11:17 UTC987 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The result of the fight: 📝Talbott's victory by unanimous decision📝 30-27 x 3 for Talbott | Official scorecards 30-27 for Talbott| By Conductor MMA

5 Dec 2025, 09:14 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Merab Dvalishvili (-480) vs Petr Yan (+350) Wrestling - Dvalishvili Striking - Yan Endurance - Dvalishvili Opposition - parity Impact force - Yan Fighting IQ - parity Wear and Tear - parity BJJ and Grappling - parity Anthropometry - parity Mental component - parity 📉 Probability of winning: (85% vs 15% for Dvalishvili) 📉

5 Dec 2025, 09:02 UTC818 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇷Alexandre Pantoja (-230)🇧🇷 vs 🇲🇲Joshua Van (+190)🇲🇲 Wrestling - Pantoja Striking - Van Endurance - Pantoja Opposition - Pantoja Impact force - Van Fighting IQ - parity Wear and Tear - Pantoja BJJ and Grappling - Pantoja Anthropometry - Pantoja Mental component - parity 📉 Probability of winning: (57% vs 43% for Pantoja) 📉

5 Dec 2025, 08:09 UTC774 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇲🇽Brandon Moreno (+105)🇲🇽 vs 🇯🇵Tatsuro Taira (-125)🇯🇵 Wrestling - parity Striking - Moreno Endurance - Moreno Opposition - Moreno Impact force - parity Fighting IQ - Moreno Wear and Tear - Moreno BJJ and Grappling - Taira Anthropometry - parity Mental component - parity 📉 Probability of winning: (64% vs 36% for Moreno) 📉

5 Dec 2025, 08:01 UTC538 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸Henry Cejudo (+220)🇺🇸 vs 🇺🇸Payton Talbott (-280)🇺🇸 Wrestling - Cejudo Striking - Talbott Endurance - parity Opposition - Cejudo Impact force - Talbott Fighting IQ - Cejudo Wear and Tear - Cejudo BJJ and Grappling - Cejudo Anthropometry - Talbott Mental component - Talbott 📉 Probability of winning: (57% vs 43% for Talbott) 📉

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dumskaya_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,119,207 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪄UFC fight predictions | Conductor MMA🔬” (@dumskaya_net), 1,481 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dumskaya_net.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.