Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jesse

Channel

Jesse

@dudu0782

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

-97 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003820343385
TypeChannel
Usernames@dudu0782 @ruirui12270
Created26 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded26 September 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dudu0782

Growth

1278139.526 September 2026 — 98 subscribers7 October 2026 — 278 subscribers7 October 2026 — 278 subscribers8 October 2026 — 1 subscribers26 September 20268 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 12 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 04:561-277
7 Oct 2026, 19:22278no change
7 Oct 2026, 18:47278+180
26 Sept 2026, 15:2298first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21525.0%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
215
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held18 (26 September 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total2,583
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 14:37 UTC78 viewsread 7 October 2026
Forwarded from @hznmzjycjg

【时间】:2026-10-07 【老师】:嘟嘟 【留名】:Joker.不烟不酒 【费用】:工兵p 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.33 【过程】:小姐姐 短发很有味道。看到照片就很想来了。 看到有工兵就立马来了 来了之后果然没有让我失望!真的很可以。 白白嫩嫩的。 小姐姐,东站附近。 小区房、非常安全。环境也很不错。先说总结: 嫩是真的嫩。服务不是流程化 ,皮肤很好。下面流程:一起洗澡之后就来到房间,开始正戏,今天状态不佳,很久才起来,妹子也没有不耐烦这一点好评。doi过程,cjs、后入都体验了一遍,屌感觉一流,妹子反馈很真实。洗完澡之后,妹子也是事后一支烟。我穿好衣服裤子就离开了,是一次很不错的出击体验。 妹子是真嫩,会的不多,有待开发。

7 Oct 2026, 06:32 UTC191 viewsread 7 October 2026

杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://t.me/hznmg23 【 推荐程度】#中好评 【优势】年轻 【不足】妹妹三件套 【出击时间】:10月6日 【老师花名】:嘟嘟 @dudu12306 【出击留名】:我想静静 【开课位置】:东站 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照评价】:9分,人照相似 【身材评价】:好 【胸部评价】:b,手感不错 【鲍鱼评价】:好 【服务评价】:不过分的都会满足 【态度评价】:态度还行 【环境评价】:环境可以 【过程描述】: #流程细节:看见上了新工兵,晚上想出击了联系老师23:30有空,交了水费聊了下天就去洗澡了, 非常小的一只,高中生,洗完以后躺在床上,老师的奶头非常挺,手感好,不胖也不瘦,四川的妹子,无异味,毛量适中,老师啥都不懂,老师的话口得也一般般, 是一个字比较嫩,喜欢嫩的可…

7 Oct 2026, 04:59 UTC177 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

早起的鸟儿有虫吃 我早起的话有没有哥哥的👅 (🉑预约)

7 Oct 2026, 03:21 UTC200 viewsread 7 October 2026

半岛嫩妹会报告模板: https://telegram.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】 【不足】 【妹子花名】:#嘟嘟 【联系方式】:@dudu12306 【妹子年龄】:18 【验证留名】:椰酥 【验证时间】:10月7日 【大概位置】:上门 【修车水费】:工兵pp 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 没要 ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:人照相似度9 【身高身材】:160,身材匀称 【凶器罩杯】:胸B+ 【湿度紧度】:紧湿度还行 【环境细节】: 【个人卫生】:个人卫生干净,有抽烟 【时间管理】:开课准时,不催 【服务点评】:服务是否到位,有无少做,过程有无机车 【推荐程度】:✅ 差评 中评 中好评 好评✅ 超级好评 【流程小文】: 凌晨睡不着翻聊天,看到有嫩妹,因为我喜欢新鲜感,尤其对嫩妹于是确认后果断cj 因为比较懒…

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dudu0782. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jesse” (@dudu0782), 1 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dudu0782.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.