Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Duckyправда

Channel

Duckyправда

@duckypravda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002638734036
TypeChannel
Username@duckypravda
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 11 April 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/duckypravda

Growth

107 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:3110no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:3410first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌭523.8%
👎523.8%
🎉419.0%
314.3%
🫡314.3%
🗿14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Mar 2026, 07:08 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

да зацдите бля я от туда 2 нфт вывел

👎1

18 Mar 2026, 06:43 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/toprocketbot/play?startapp=2a56204d-c95c-46bd-afc1-30fc6a4c0ba7 new fireheadz project

👎1

18 Apr 2025, 10:56 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кто первый в игре получил модель джекпот утки? Разберем каждую: 😎 - Ее ни у кого нет. Она не выпадает 🇺🇸 - Первым Трампа получил @ripertsber 💸 - Первым утку с двф лабс получил @cyxapcrypto 💎 - Первым утку с алмазом получил @gop4k ☎️ - Первым утку Дурова получил @goldrinat 🌟 - Первым утку из мемхасл получил @smakhtinp 🌟 - Первым утку с ножом получил ???, но вторым был @cryptoo_exe Who first received each jac

1

17 Apr 2025, 06:02 UTC85 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Факт дня: покупка уток в инкубаторе за TON самая не выгодная Если перевести каждую из доступных валют в $, то увидим, что в TON нам придется отвалить 1.98$ Лучше всего к покупке подходят звезды (1.53$) и $EGG (1.52$) Fact of the day: buying ducks in an incubator for TON is the most unprofitable If we convert each of the available currencies into $, we will see that in TON we will have to pay $1.98 Stars ($1.53)

🌭5🫡32

16 Apr 2025, 13:21 UTC77 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Факт дня: эта утка, которую нам показали 6 февраля, никогда не выйдет в игру Vitaly: Нет, не ждите военной тематики Fact of the day: this duck, which was shown to us on February 6th, will never be released in the game. Vitaly: No, don't expect any military themes.

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @duckypravda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Duckyправда” (@duckypravda), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duckypravda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.