quite the rejection so far from the daily bb top, at around 920 usd. Lets see how daily closes, pretty volatile bots vs bots vs bots vs bots lol
❤2

Channel
@ducktechnicalastronomy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
94subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002491099662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ducktechnicalastronomy |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ducktechnicalastronomy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 94 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 96 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 96 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 71.4% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
quite the rejection so far from the daily bb top, at around 920 usd. Lets see how daily closes, pretty volatile bots vs bots vs bots vs bots lol
❤2
didnt expect mu to hit 920 THIS fast, so volatile. A daily close above ought to 'signal' bull trend back, with the exception of a fakeout. I am very new to trading stocks and i thought the mega caps would be calmer, but then I see Mag7 doing + or - 10 to 20% on single days and it's scary especially with leverage. One thing im still trying to figure out is what if my order fills in after hours (post market or overnig…
micron weekly chart update, then vs now. TA works better on bigger caps i believe. Next micron hurdle would be daily bb top, which it bounced off since spring, but since it lost it, rejected off it twice (July). Around 920USD.
❤1
my other pending trade theory is shorting eth actually. It is in an uptrend on the weekly, but at resistance (weekly frame, and eth/btc on monthly). SL is easy on this as there is always a chance of a god candle that breaks above resistance that invalidates the trade. Notice how everyone has been very bullish eth past 2 weeks, I even saw "eth to 10k programmed" tweet, right at resistance. Coincidence? lets see. Game…
❤2
took more than 10days for part of these MU orders to get filled. This is my trading life now, from 1-2 trades per week to per month. Wall st legendary traders recommend to not enter fomc with an open trade iirc, so will have to consider setting sort of sl in profit. MU dumped onchain overnight. Goes without saying this is a very volatile fomc coz opinions are mixed about hike vs none. Some great traders say memory is…
❤1
some cool semis observation: weekly SNDK has bounced between the middle BB and 100ema. Soon MU will hit that too. I noticed they respect TA on larger time frames, similar to large mc crypto coins. (red line is 20w ema) Basically, good to punt orders at such levels for a high confidence rebound trade. DCA instead of snipe since different traders and algos are using the MA's and/or EMA's...which puts MU between 700 a…
while pleb argue muh trump news muh trump pumping market muh micron so back, "show me the chart i will tell you the news". Donald dump is noise. Micron bounced off technical support+short term late longer capitulation, just like it rugged coz uptrend lost. Duck affords shelter another day. already dca-ing out coz im a jeet edit: a tg chat im in turned into mental health support group/copium coz of semi dump. Pretty …
❤2
greetings from the beyond. Update: been barely trading, as we got hit with a strong heat wave in europe. Testing the waters trading stocks, going good but it's also hard like crypto, and it feels like alt coins a lot. I have been monitoring $MU daily (top signal) and longed it when it hit its support, but did not short it when it lost its uptrend since April. Instead I shorted $SOL (red circles on weekly chart) jus…
❤2
getting washed out on these low to medium confidence trades. Causes my trading pnl to yo-yo. Previous years id just buy spot and hold, it carried my port. Now I look at btc or other coins and I cant fathom holding a lot of it, like older times. The aspiration is simply not there. In 2022 I wasnt worried coz I knew in my heart the bull will come again. Now I look at 2029, i am not hopeful for crypto as a whole. Theres…
❤2
if itching to trade, my current medium to low medium confidence trade is short btc now and 65s. The range is still intact technically, it isnt unheard of for the range to have weekly wicks below the previous range lows (eg see image 2025 tariff war, 2025 ath q4). A full weekly close below range (feb 2026) for me is 'death of range'. Just betting on 65 being a bit harder to break. Risk is volatility with trump, spcx, …
❤1
did a duck sentiment analysis the past few days, those that were here early know i track linkedgay posts for 'low quality retail', but sometimes plebbit too (eu personal finance sub). What can I say, very mixed which i dont like. I prefer more extreme sentiments. Summary: - reddit: several posts dca-ing crypto, not so much hate for these posts - linkedgay: 50/50, either finance professionals calling 30 to 50k, or c…
❤2
i was the only retard i saw waiting for 59s on btc and we're now 5% up from it. Why did i say 59 and not some random 55k or 28k like all the other retards there? the blue thick line is 50 month ma, havent been hit since like june 2022. Also, it's a game of chess or football right? 59s is psychological kill switch, meaning 60k is the line in the sand, lose it and all traders stop loss or even short the break down. How…
❤3👍2😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ducktechnicalastronomy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Duck TA (technical astronomy)” (@ducktechnicalastronomy), 94 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ducktechnicalastronomy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.