Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Duck'n'Verse: TON NFT | En Español 🇪🇸

Channel

Duck'n'Verse: TON NFT | En Español 🇪🇸

@ducknverse_es

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716806192
TypeChannel
Username@ducknverse_es
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 23 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ducknverse_es

Growth

314 Aug 2026, 00:04 — 3 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 3 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 00:0415 Aug 2026, 01:46
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:463no change
14 Aug 2026, 00:043first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1937.3%
1631.4%
🔥611.8%
👏47.84%
😁47.84%
🥰23.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2022 to 13 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jan 2024, 22:52 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

24 Dec 2023, 10:31 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

30 May 2022, 15:44 UTC31 viewsread 14 August 2026

From now on, Duck'n'Verse is only available in English – at its original @ducknverse channel. Seek to unite the TON NFT community and communicate the stories right – therefore we encourage you to follow the stories in its source (or use Telegram's native translate feature).

30 May 2022, 12:33 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Las expresiones son de gran valor para cualquier personaje. Observando las expresiones puedes conectar mentalmente con una obra de arte y sentir que tocas el NFT que posees. El trabajo en xPDP es un arduo proceso de ingeniería y dirección de arte: un equipo de 3 solamente trabaja en esta dirección, mientras continúan las ideas en el chat de @duckbase (gracias ❤️). Entre los nuevos conceptos de NFT presentados en el

2👍2

28 May 2022, 14:45 UTC27 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Hemos terminado el arquetipo de los xPDP NFTs. Cada NFT constará de 5 capas: el fondo, el atuendo, las emociones, el arma y el elemento principal. La rareza se definirá por las combinaciones de estos elementos, y no por el hecho de poseerlos. DnV ya está desarrollando una herramienta que ayudará a los coleccionistas de xPDP a navegar a través de los diferentes niveles de rareza.

2👏1

27 May 2022, 13:22 UTC53 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Sube de temperatura el ambiente en Duck'n'Verse. Después de noches de insomnio, nuestro artista y nuestro director de arte crean NFTs de la más alta calidad posible. Aunque, son necesarias ideas cada vez más locas para diseñarlos 👩‍🎤. Y es aquí donde te pedimos tu ayuda. Daremos 30 Toncoin a los autores de las 3 mejores ideas para xPDP NFTs: 1. Ve al chat de @duckbase; 2. Envía un mensaje con su idea de cómo podría

👍3🥰2

24 May 2022, 17:25 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026

¿Qué justifica el valor de los NFTs? —Esa es una pregunta controvercial que todos podrían darle una respuesta diferente, y cada una podría estar correcta. En junio, xPensivDuckPics saldrá a mercado, convirtiéndose en parte de la economía masiva de TON NFT. Vemos el paradigma de la siguiente manera: la mejor manera para que los NFTs adquieran valor líquido es convertirlos en un poderoso objeto cultural respaldado por

👍4🔥2

24 May 2022, 16:32 UTC23 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Mientras que el artista está bajo presión debido al rediseño de los NFT xPDP, "tomamos prestado" el móvil del líder de nuestro equipo y leímos a escondidas algunos chats relacionados con el trabajo. Ahora lo compartimos con ustedes. El mundo debe saber. 🌎

😁4👍2

24 May 2022, 14:38 UTC19 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

DnV tiene un grupo de chat donde publicamos pequeños adelantos del proyecto: @duckbase. Pronto realizaremos un airdrop de $TON en el que pueden participar todos sus miembros (y regalaremos a un afortunado un gooz 🦆).

👏3👍2

24 May 2022, 11:29 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

En vista de sostener a nuestro pequeño, pero poderoso equipo financiado, el club @marbleton, socio de DnV, realizará una preventa privada de xPDP NFTs. A diferencia de una preventa pública a través de un bot, esta forma es más justa y menos complicada de llevar a cabo. No se deben distribuir más de 50 NFTs (> 5% del suministro máximo). A los participantes – un grupo activo de coleccionistas NFTs – se les ofrecen ped

8

23 May 2022, 19:14 UTC36 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026

#PatoCuentos 2: "El Palo" 🏒 A medida que Gooz crecía, se acercaba a ese día en la vida de todos los Duckz. El día en que los Hoomans llevan a los Duckz a la fábrica. Ningún Duckz podía resistirse. Sabían que no había otra opción: “—Así es como funcionan las cosas aquí...”, pensaron. Pero Gooz... Gooz tenía una opinión diferente. El día antes de que Gooz cumpliera sus 2 años, encontró una rama dura y larga en el bo

👍32🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ducknverse_es. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,285,970 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Duck'n'Verse: TON NFT | En Español 🇪🇸” (@ducknverse_es), 3 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ducknverse_es.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.