Channel
@dtlight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,416subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001124774464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dtlight |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dtlight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 1,416 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 1,417 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 1,418 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,108 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 38.9% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#灯塔实盘 今日复盘【BTC】 🧐团队交易员复盘：流动性不足的震荡行情中，不追求大波段，而是通过区间交易、严格计划和低预期获取利润。 昨日行情整体处于震荡调整阶段，市场流动性偏低，想要抓住一段完整的大级别趋势波段难度较高。因此交易思路并不是追求暴利，而是在有限的波动空间内，通过耐心等待关键位置，利用区间震荡获取利润。 开盘阶段，行情背景偏向收敛向上运行，但由于价格已经接近前方压力区域，因此预期并没有放得过高，更多以防守和短线交易为主。 随后美盘阶段，价格出现了一段较强的空头回调，上方阻力明显，多头反弹受到压制。但在这种极端幅度的震荡行情中，趋势延续性并不强，更适合按照震荡区间进行处理，而不是盲目追空。 在关键位置附近，观察到价格形成下降收敛三角结构。17号K线收盘接近低点，随后18号K线出现强势反包信号，说明短线空头力量开始衰减。因此在19号K线突破18号K线高点后，按照计划进行多单布局。 后续价格再次测试低点附近支…
#灯塔学院 【今日知识】亚当夏娃形态（中） 🔷市场为什么会形成两种不同节奏 Adam and Eve真正值得研究的并不是图形，而是两次测试背后的市场行为。第一次测试往往充满恐慌或狂热，因此形成尖锐的V形；第二次测试则更加冷静，市场已经没有第一次那么极端，因此价格开始缓慢运行，形成圆弧状走势。两种节奏共同构成了市场情绪从失控走向平衡的过程。 🔷底部为什么更容易成功 当这种结构出现在下跌趋势末端时，第一次快速下跌代表空头最后一次集中释放力量，而第二次缓慢回踩则说明卖方已经越来越难创造新的低点。价格虽然再次来到支撑区域，但下跌速度明显放缓，这意味着市场开始逐渐接受当前价格，新的买盘也开始持续进入。 🔷顶部形成的逻辑完全相反 如果 Adam and Eve 出现在上涨趋势中，第一次尖锐高点代表多头最后一次快速拉升，而第二次圆弧顶部则说明上涨动能开始衰退。市场虽然仍然停留在高位，却已经无法像第一次那样快速突破，这种变化往往意味着上…
#灯塔研究 【今日早盘】BTC 📈昨日回顾： 昨日BTC上破短期震荡收敛形态，尝试向上测试压力位，但未形成有效突破。目前价格仍运行在上升宽通道内部，多空双方持续博弈，市场暂未出现明显方向性分歧。整体来看，行情仍处于前期超跌后的修复调整阶段，趋势尚未完全选择。 📈今日预期： 当前市场处于复杂震荡环境，短线多空力量均未占据绝对优势，预计今日仍以区间震荡为主。需要注意的是，震荡行情中容易出现多空双向插针，假突破和快速反转概率增加，交易难度较高。 📈操作策略： 今日交易以区间思路为主，降低预期，避免追涨杀跌。等待关键位置确认后再进行操作，控制仓位，谨防震荡行情中的快速洗盘。当前阶段重点不是寻找暴利机会，而是等待市场给出更加明确的方向信号。 📖 灯塔频道 👉 跟单 🌍 官网
#灯塔实盘 今日复盘【BTC】 🧐团队交易员复盘：一次突破反转中的复盘 今天复盘这一笔突破反转交易，最大的感受不是行情给了多少利润，而是在等待和确认的过程中，自己对于交易节奏的理解又深了一层。 市场在前期经历了一段明显的下跌，价格不断试探低位，第一次测试前低时，出现了一根带有明显下影线的K线，说明低位已经开始有资金承接。随后紧接着出现强阳K线，并且收盘站上关键位置，这一刻其实已经给出了第一次反转信号。 但交易不是看到一根阳线就急着入场。 很多时候，真正的机会并不在第一根上涨K线出现的时候，而是在市场回踩确认的时候。第一次反弹之后，价格没有继续直接拉升，而是再次回到关键区域附近测试支撑。第二次测试前低，盘面依旧保持弱势，长时间横盘，很多人会因为没有看到快速上涨而失去耐心。 但真正的交易逻辑，是观察市场有没有继续破坏结构。 这一次，价格没有跌破关键支撑，而是在低位形成止跌信号，随后再次收出阳线突破。相比第一次机会，这一…
❤1
#灯塔学院 【今日知识】亚当夏娃形态（上） 🔷从K线到图表形态 前面的课程中，我们学习了许多利用几根K线判断市场情绪变化的反转形态。从今天开始，我们进入另一类经典价格行为分析——图表形态（Chart Patterns）。相比单独几根K线，图表形态通常需要更长时间形成，因此能够更完整地反映市场从趋势、震荡到反转的全过程。亚当夏娃形态（Adam and Eve Pattern）就是其中最经典的双重底部与双重顶部形态之一。 🔷为什么叫“亚当”和“夏娃” 这个形态的名字来源于两种完全不同的价格结构。Adam（亚当）代表一个尖锐、快速形成的V形顶部或底部，而 Eve（夏娃）则代表一个圆润、缓慢形成的U形顶部或底部。两者组合在一起，便形成了经典的 Adam and Eve 结构。它本质上属于双顶和双底形态的特殊演化形式，只不过两次高点或低点拥有完全不同的市场节奏。 🔷第一阶段：情绪化交易 Adam部分通常形成得非常快。无论是底部还是…
#灯塔研究 【今日早盘】ETH 📈 昨日回顾 ETH 昨日整体走出震荡偏强结构，价格从低位反弹后重新站回关键区域，目前市场价格约在 1900附近。近期ETH在1800～2000美元区间反复震荡，多空资金持续博弈，短线仍然处于反弹修复阶段。 📈今日预期 价格重新回到1900上方，但没有有效突破前期压力区域，属于反弹中的震荡整理。 📈操作策略 区间内高抛低吸，或等待行情走出顺势而为，小仓位入场谨慎做单。 📖 灯塔频道 👉 跟单 🌍 官网
❤2💯1🙏1
#灯塔实盘 【今日复盘】ETH ✅指标信号：+47点 机会1—— AM 6：00 | 空头+17点 机会2——AM9：00 ｜多头+19点 机会3——PM 2:15｜空头+16点 🧐团队初级交易员复盘：一次被情绪带偏的交易 这一单输给了自己的主观。刚开始看到价格跌破前低，判断市场可能还有一段下跌空间，所以尝试入场做空。但过程中没有严格执行自己的计划，更多是在跟随情绪交易。 行情没有按照预期继续下跌，反而开始反弹。这个时候本应该重新观察结构变化，确认趋势是否发生改变，但自己还是停留在原来的判断里，后面价格不断上涨，自己的第一反应不是止损，而是想等市场回来。甚至在错误的位置继续加仓，试图通过降低成本解决问题。 直到行情突破关键位置，才意识到市场已经不是原来的节奏。最后只能被迫止损离场。 交易最危险的时候，不是看错方向，而是看错以后还不愿意接受。 市场永远不会因为自己的判断而改变，真正成熟的交易者，不是每一次都能抓到行情，而是…
👍2👌1🤝1
#灯塔学院 【今日知识】刺透形态 🔷跌势中的第一次反击 刺透形态（Piercing Pattern）是一种经典的看涨反转形态，由两根K线组成，通常出现在下跌趋势末端。它记录的并不是市场已经上涨，而是买方第一次展现出足以挑战空头的力量。这种形态的重点不在于第二根阳线有多大，而在于它成功深入了前一根阴线的实体区域，从而改变了原本持续下跌的市场节奏。 🔷空头主导开始松动 形态的第一根K线通常是一根较长的阴线，这说明市场依然处于明显下跌趋势之中。卖方持续压低价格，市场情绪普遍悲观。然而到了第二天，价格往往会向下跳空开盘，这会进一步强化市场的看空预期。许多交易者会认为下跌正在加速，但随后发生的变化却与预期完全不同。 🔷买方开始夺回阵地 当第二根K线形成后，市场开始出现明显买盘。价格不仅收复了当天的跌幅，还持续向上推进，最终收盘进入前一根阴线实体内部。这里最关键的条件是，阳线收盘必须突破前一根阴线实体的中点。这代表买方已经不仅仅是在…
#灯塔研究 【今日早盘】ETH 📈昨日回顾：空 周一整体走势空头，亚盘开盘开始下跌，24小时走势一致，也走的很标准的空头，目标位与咱们昨日早盘分析一致，基本打到了最后一跌的位置，周一总跌幅-1.3%（-24.59点）。 📈今日预期：震荡/空 今日预期还是比较看两种情况，第一种会震荡，没有什么方向；第二种会继续下跌，目前位置基本是继续下跌的开始，日渐高概率会有这两种走势。 📈操作策略：震荡/空 空头目标——1839~1825 震荡区间——1848~1873 📖 灯塔频道 👉 跟单 🌍 官网
👍1
#灯塔实盘 【今日复盘】ETH ✅指标信号：+45点 机会1—— AM8：30 ｜空头+45点 📖 灯塔频道 👉 指标 🌍 官网
❤1🔥1
#灯塔学院 【今日知识】南方三星形态（下） 🔷市场正在传递什么信号 南方三星真正表达的是趋势衰竭。第一根阴线代表卖方仍然强势，第二根阴线代表卖方开始减弱，而第三根阴线则代表市场已经失去继续下跌的动力。整个过程就像一个不断减速的物体，虽然还在向前移动，但已经越来越接近停止。 🔷与三乌鸦最大的区别 如果你还记得我们之前讲过的三只乌鸦，会发现两者都是连续三根阴线。但三只乌鸦强调的是卖方力量不断增强，每一根阴线都在扩大空头优势；而南方三星则完全相反，它强调的是卖方力量不断减弱，每一根阴线都比前一根更加疲弱。因此两种形态虽然外观相似，却表达了完全不同的市场语言。 🔷与Takuri线的联系 Takuri线讲述的是一次剧烈下探后的强势拒绝，而南方三星讲述的是一个逐渐耗尽的过程。前者属于突然出现的买方反击，后者属于卖方逐步失去优势。简单来说，Takuri更像是一场快速反转，而南方三星更像是一场缓慢筑底。 🔷为什么这种形态较少出现 南方…
❤1💯1
#灯塔研究 【今日早盘】ETH 📈昨日回顾：宽幅震荡 周五——空头 周五走势整体呈空头，24小时走了非常标准的下跌，总跌幅2.9%（-55.63点）； 周六——空头 周六整体走势震荡，一整天基本都在横盘，走的K线很重叠，只是在凌晨来了最后一波下跌， 整日的跌幅基本都在1-2根线，总跌幅0.94%（-17.51点）； 周日——多头 周日整体走势震荡上行，在经历周六晚强势下跌后周日开始逐渐修复，早上9点强势拉升后，开始横盘震荡，整体走势在震荡向上走，总涨幅2.18%（40.20点）。 📈今日预期：多情境 经历了上周空头走势后，行情目前走到了1小时级别的关键位置，1893~1900之间上方重要压力位； 今日走势会有两种情况，此处如果遇到压力下来，日渐高概率会继续空，延续上周走势； 也有可能此处继续震荡，没有明确方向，整体还在宽幅震荡； 大家要根据9点的K线位置，以及上午走势来整体判断。 📈操作策略：灵活处理 空头——1851~…
👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dtlight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 418,955 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“灯塔智投” (@dtlight), 1,416 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dtlight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.