Channel
@dsfzf88
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,247subscribers
+1,066 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003480204829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsfzf88 |
| Created | 20 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsfzf88 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 1,247 | +1,069 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:09 | 178 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 179 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 181 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 181 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 9 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨请点击下面蓝色字体直击导航🚨 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 ✅ 海外App帐号导航区 😫 😀Line专栏 📱Kakao专栏 📱Tinder专栏 🌟Facebook友缘 📱GV 😄 YouTube 😀Twitter推特 😀instagram账号 😀Facebook脸书 😀WhatsApp账号 😀Vkonetakte账号 😀Linkedin账号 😀Tiktok账号 😀亚马逊账号 😀 Discord账号 😀苹果ID账号 😀Google邮箱 😀telegram账号 ✅ 国内App帐号导航区 😫 😀微信账号 …
有部分客户会提出“是否可以先上号再付款”的问题，以下是我们不支持此方式的主要原因： 1️⃣风控问题与资源损失： 💙账号登录会涉及设备IP记录，一旦出现重复登录或异常IP，就会触发平台风控。部分客户在试号后不再购买，导致账号被标记，严重影响账工作室的损失。这种风险无法由我们单方面承担。 2️⃣防范中介套利与恶意行为： 💙我们遇到过多起类似案例：对方拿到账号后不断挑毛病，例如质疑实名、账单、风控等问题，实则是将账号转手他人，从中收取费用，最终导致我们被其他人投诉账号问题及客服服务，影响极其恶劣。 3️⃣理解但无法配合的请求： 💙我们理解大家之前可能有被其他商家欺骗的经历，但不能因此要求我们工作室打破行业基本交易规则。交易讲究一手交钱一手交货，这既是保障商家权益，也是在为客户提供安全保障。 4️⃣售后保障说明： 💙我们支持所有业务在非人为问题导致的质量问题下，进行合理的售后退换处理。只要问题确实存在，我们一定积极负责，绝不推诿…
📱 Google【谷歌邮箱账户】 😍 谷歌邮箱： 😎 注册5天以上英语全新邮箱账户：2u 😎 注册满1个月邮箱账户：3u 😎 注册满6个月邮箱账户：4u 😎 注册满1-5年邮箱账户：5u 帐号说明： 创建地区为随机 帐号间互不关联，使用稳定，用途自测。 所有账号均经过严格测试，均可正常使用， 每天都会上新，请放心购买 。 批量购买价格更优惠，大量购买前，建议先小量购买进行测试。 卡密格式: [email protected]@xxxx.com 帐号----密码----辅助邮箱（ 用于登录确认输入） 登陆网址: gmail.com (包官方登录，第三方登录不上不售后。) 售后问题： 谷歌邮箱首登，登录不上包换，请放心购买。 三方平台使用谷歌登录，登录不上均和谷歌邮箱本身无关，只保证邮箱本身可用，不提供售后。 （三方会对谷歌邮箱属性有各种要…
🌟【美国 AppleID 苹果ID】全新没激活iCloud，可下载APP。—【5U】 🌟【香港 AppleID 苹果ID】全新没激活iCloud，可下载APP。—【5U】 🌟【台湾 AppleID 苹果ID】全新没激活iCloud，可下载APP。—【5U】 🌟【日本 AppleID 苹果ID】全新没激活iCloud，可下载APP。—【5U】 注意事项： 一人一号，卖完删档。 遇见不能下载app，删除APP重新下载苹果不支持换账号更新APP，不要开启双重认证，容易登录不上。 统一密保：1990-01-01---朋友：aaa111---工作：aab112---父母：aac113 英文密保：1990-01-01---friend：aaa111---job：aab112---parents：aac113 统一密保：1990-01-01---朋友：a111---工作：b222---父母：c333 英文密保：1990-0…
👍👍👍👍 🤩代开电报会员-单月-多月 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 * 3个月 = 13 U（提供用户名） 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 * 6个月 = 17 U（提供用户名） 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 * 12个月 =30 U（提供用户名） 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✅本产品都为官方ton正价开通，非盗刷|非消费欺诈，永不掉会员 😍点击置顶导航查看商品价格表😍
❤1
🎧🎧🎧❤️❤️❤️❤️🎧🎧🎧 🙂🙃😉😌😍🥰😘😗😙😚 一次相遇，终身朋友，感谢每位顾客的信任与支持，回购不断！ 品质卓越，服务至上，老客回购只因信赖与满意！ 诚心待顾客，每一次回购都是最好的证明。 诚信经营赢口碑，期待您再次光临哦～ 🚩祝各位老板业绩一路长红🚩
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @dsfzf88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 238,801 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dsfzf88 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阿飞 批发各种账号 广告代发” (@dsfzf88), 1,247 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsfzf88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.