Channel
@dsenln
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
791subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004464223888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsenln |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsenln |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 791 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 783 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:39 | 783 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,303 |
| Reactions total | 1,086 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,086 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5370612391807591254 | 240 | 22.1% | |
| custom 5370633471507076544 | 221 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5188601496098344782 | 163 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5370597449616366587 | 97 | 8.93% | |
| custom 5231411754419902915 | 85 | 7.83% | |
| custom 5425136030967687440 | 80 | 7.37% | |
| custom 6008206372867413092 | 66 | 6.08% | |
| custom 5321200480989251915 | 62 | 5.71% | |
| custom 5445190899720037159 | 25 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5474622678511949444 | 20 | 1.84% | |
| custom 5251366863966857908 | 16 | 1.47% | |
| custom 5368834979721683592 | 11 | 1.01% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,086reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dsenln. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀конкурс на 340 ⚝ 1 место: 💎⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 2 место: 💍 3 место: 🎂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀4 место: 🍾 5 место: 🎁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀6 место: 💝 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ условие: подписка и актив в каналах: 1. @extinguished 2. френдова 3. церковь ничтожества 4. saint unplugged 5. беззащитный мечник 6. @kittisaya 7. hskkayy результаты 10 августа, 18:00
custom 53706123918075912543custom 53212004809892519152custom 60082063728674130921
лайк подписка
custom 537061239180759125437custom 532120048098925191524custom 537063347150707654423custom 544519089972003715920custom 600820637286741309220custom 518860149609834478219custom 542513603096768744019
ладно это пранк
custom 542513603096768744055custom 600820637286741309237custom 532120048098925191530custom 537061239180759125428custom 537063347150707654425custom 518860149609834478221custom 53705974496163665878
мужик должен быть шлюхой на кухне похуй
custom 518860149609834478229custom 537061239180759125415custom 525136686396685790810custom 53705974496163665875custom 60082063728674130923custom 53706334715070765441
никогда не доверяйте нам с алиной готовить еду.никогда. как выяснилось кроме блинов с принтом «хуй» мы ничего больше приготовить не можем.
custom 537061239180759125422custom 537063347150707654414custom 53705974496163665878custom 52314117544199029157custom 53212004809892519152custom 54251360309676874402
нувыпонялида
custom 537061239180759125441custom 537063347150707654431custom 523141175441990291525custom 518860149609834478221custom 537059744961636658721custom 54251360309676874404custom 52513668639668579083
у вас спина белая
custom 537063347150707654446custom 537061239180759125432custom 523141175441990291522custom 518860149609834478221custom 537059744961636658720custom 52513668639668579083custom 54451908997200371593
я недовольна
custom 518860149609834478217custom 53705974496163665877custom 53212004809892519154
когда уже в канал можно песню добавить будет, как в профиль тгшки
custom 537061239180759125424custom 537059744961636658714custom 60082063728674130922custom 53706334715070765441
ну обидно если честно
custom 537063347150707654439custom 537061239180759125427custom 518860149609834478224custom 523141175441990291515custom 53705974496163665874custom 54451908997200371592custom 60082063728674130921
привет
custom 537063347150707654441custom 547462267851194944420custom 523141175441990291516custom 518860149609834478211custom 536883497972168359211custom 537061239180759125411custom 537059744961636658710custom 60082063728674130922
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dsenln. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 755,185 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dsenln named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hs'kkayy” (@dsenln), 791 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsenln.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.