涵涵 158cm 44kg B奶 21歲 很瘦 喜歡骨感的可以約 甜美的長髮女生 服務都超級好配合 💰特價10k一節 #不砍價 #雙北可約
❤1
Signed 小韻最美

Channel
@dsa3568
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,190subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002254518314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsa3568 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsa3568 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 6,190 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 6,182 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 6,183 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 6,187 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 6,190 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 6,192 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 6,193 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (11 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,131 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
39 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 22 | 56.4% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 30.8% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
涵涵 158cm 44kg B奶 21歲 很瘦 喜歡骨感的可以約 甜美的長髮女生 服務都超級好配合 💰特價10k一節 #不砍價 #雙北可約
❤1
Signed 小韻最美
其實我早就上班了😂
❤2
Signed 小韻最美
又收穫一位新朋友啦 超開心~ 去年年底就加入小韻了 今天剛好有空 我剛好有適合你的妹 見面直接買兩節✌️ PS: 最近真的是來了很多新朋友 小韻想說 謝謝你們願意把信任交給我 我沒辦法能做到讓所有人都100%滿意 但 越做越好 一直都是小韻沒有放下的目標 幸運總是會眷顧努力的人 我也會一直往前 希望有一天 小韻能成為你們想到 “可靠” 兩字時 自然會想起的人🫶
👍1
Signed 小韻最美
相信自己 持續前進好好努力 美好的結果終將自然浮現 昨天晚上剛加入的新朋友果斷預約 對小韻也是完全信任 不猶豫 不看照 小韻也會全力為大家挑選優質女生 來回報這份百分百的信任~~
❤3
Signed 小韻最美
始終相信以真心換真心 儘管真心交出去很常被丟棄
👍3🥰3💩1
Signed 小韻最美
是一位非常信任我的哥哥呀 昨晚加入果斷預約 沒有太多猶豫 我知道信任很難得 更何況第一次認識 所以每當有哥哥很信任我時 願意交給我 我就更不想隨隨便便就交差 這次直接偷偷拿出位隱藏妹安排給哥哥🤫 小隻 年輕 可愛 看起來乖乖的 其實超反差 這位平常我真的很少拿出來 時間也超難卡 臨時當天想約基本上很難約得到 #預約制 剛好哥哥時間對上,我就想說—— 這份信任值得我拿點好康出來回應💓 “155cm 44kg B 21歲 思思”
👍6❤2
Signed 小韻最美
極力推薦一個少婦 有顏值有身材有胸的少婦 約她符合你所有的需求 堪稱完美比例任何姿勢都給配合 充滿氣質活力的讓她坐你身上搖哦 💰13k一節 24k兩節 164cm 49kg D奶 32歲
❤4👍1
Signed 小韻最美
有選擇誰也不會願意賣身體賺錢 不是每個人都可以做到像小姐這樣 她放下自尊 放下面子 為了生活只能賣身體賺錢 客人花錢當大爺 給她臉色 給她歧視 給她嫌棄 給她的差評 說她胖 說她醜 說她老 她都要接受 還要微笑的面對客人 我能嗎 我不能 換做是你們 你們也是一樣不能 不喜歡可以不約 不喜歡可以打槍 而不是浪費大家的時間來耍人 真的很沒有同理心!
👍7
Signed 小韻最美
CC客評 #一位必約的女生 #顔值很高 你的嬌羞小女友 非常有女友fu的妹 感謝我最好的哥哥送來的客評
👍4🔥1
Signed 小韻最美
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dsa3568. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 134,741 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🥇小韻|台灣高端外送茶+Gleezy:tzy519” (@dsa3568), 6,190 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsa3568.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.