Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DruxAMB πŸ§‘πŸ½β€πŸ’»

Channel

DruxAMB πŸ§‘πŸ½β€πŸ’»

@druxambchannel

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,100subscribers

-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002210952707
TypeChannel
Username@druxambchannel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/druxambchannel

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1001,2511,175.57 August 2026 β€” 1,251 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,251 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 1,250 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 1,237 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 1,222 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 1,216 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,206 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 1,200 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 1,193 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 1,180 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 1,173 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 1,164 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 1,145 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 1,133 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 1,129 subscribers29 September 2026 β€” 1,112 subscribers6 October 2026 β€” 1,100 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 60 days, net -151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,077–1,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 16:551,100-12
29 Sept 2026, 07:171,112-17
19 Sept 2026, 13:551,129-4
15 Sept 2026, 04:371,133-12
11 Sept 2026, 14:171,145-19
6 Sept 2026, 13:001,164-9
1 Sept 2026, 20:541,173-7
29 Aug 2026, 11:561,180-13
26 Aug 2026, 19:141,193-7
24 Aug 2026, 04:361,200-6
20 Aug 2026, 10:131,206-10
17 Aug 2026, 14:381,216-6
14 Aug 2026, 15:161,222-15
11 Aug 2026, 07:171,237-13
8 Aug 2026, 00:451,250-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:011,251no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:111,251first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

172 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯5733.1%
πŸ‘4425.6%
❀‍πŸ”₯2715.7%
✍148.14%
πŸ’―126.98%
πŸ†74.07%
πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»63.49%
😁21.16%
😱21.16%
⚑10.581%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Flare Summer Signal πŸ”₯ This is an open online hackathon for builders creating real products on Flare. Participants can build from scratch, bring an existing project, or port an existing product to Flare. πŸ’° Prize Pool: $12,000 πŸ—“ Date: Jun 29 - Aug 14 register here 🌟 - question 🌟

πŸ”₯3πŸ†1

28 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC152 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Task O'Clock ⚫️ Follow @'GlazeWallet Like & Quote the tweet above Comment is a plus $2 USDC reward each, more details πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ here πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ ask your doubts in the comment section below

πŸ”₯5πŸ†2

28 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC286 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Many know me as a die-hard Windows user, but I had to purchase an Apple Silicon M4 to build this for glaze store. I built this native macOS desktop wallet to fix crypto's clunky UX. πŸ‘©β€πŸ’» Features include: - Killing the browser extension requirement. - Total flexibility over managing your funds. - Zero seed phrases to worry about. - Frictionless, server-funded gas execution. - Sending and receiving using just @'usern…

❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ†1

28 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC132 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

new video out The Monopoly That Broke Web3 - The GlazeWallet Story I burnt lots of credits and edited overnight to come up with this 4 minute launch video. Engage to not let my effort go to waste :) TASK TICKING πŸ’¬ ⭐

πŸ”₯1

11 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC235 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

TASK 0'Clock ⏰ pick between A B & C, choose wisely! based on my personality, which would I select❓ there can only be 4 winners. The first people to COMMENT the right option on this tweet will receive $0.5 (₦780) each into their account, Goodluck πŸ’Έ

πŸ‘2πŸ”₯2

11 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC221 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

new video out This Founder Made an Ink So Natural You Can Drink πŸ–‹ watch here: https://youtu.be/g1SmJmPBwvc TASK TICKING πŸ’¬ ⭐

πŸ‘1

10 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC210 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Important Notice ℹ️ The "Most Active Member" weekly reward aren't happening cause no one is active in this group. I see people a bit active only when I run task rewards. Therefore, the weekly reward is paused till further notice, while the daily task rewards continues.

πŸ”₯3❀‍πŸ”₯2

5 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC349 viewsread 7 August 2026

Drop your wallet address 1000,000 worth of this video token will be shared among the first 10 people to comment their base ETH wallet address in this tweet. Ensure you like and retweet before dropping your wallet address. 🌐 https://x.com/DruxAMB/status/2073814097414537688?s=20 🐦 πŸ’Έ Be The First and You Get Airdropped πŸ’Έ

4 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC460 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Task O'clock: The Clipping Challenge! You voted, and we are delivering! We are giving away rewards to the first 8 members who help share our latest video. The Challenge: Take a short, engaging clip from the video below and get at least 300 views on it. https://youtu.be/2bIorNIlhQE ℹ️ How to Win & The Rules: βšͺ️ Post anywhere: Share your clip on YouTube Shorts, X, Instagram Reels, LinkedIn, TikTok, or Facebook. βšͺ️ …

πŸ”₯2😱2πŸ†1

4 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC343 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

new video out: We Found a Chinese Halal Restaurant opposite our hotel 🍜☺️ click to watch: https://youtu.be/2bIorNIlhQE

❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1

30 Jun 2026, 20:12 UTC541 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

React with a random emoji (the one you like the most) and leave a comment below if you're just joining. . . . 🫑 We all know this group is meant to share Hackathons & Builder Residency opportunities and my journey, but I need to run these rewards sometimes to help make the community active. Thanks for your understanding

πŸ”₯22πŸ‘7πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»6πŸ†2⚑1

30 Jun 2026, 20:10 UTC575 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

How should the next reward be distributed?

  1. $0.3 (₦500) For 8 Members33%
  2. $0.5 (₦650) For 6 Members17%
  3. $0.7 (₦1000) For 4 Members33%
  4. $1.5 (₦2000) For 2 Members17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

✍8πŸ’―5πŸ‘4❀‍πŸ”₯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @druxambchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 20:10 UTCFinal Results6 voters

How should the next reward be distributed?

  1. $0.3 (₦500) For 8 Members33%
  2. $0.5 (₦650) For 6 Members17%
  3. $0.7 (₦1000) For 4 Members33%
  4. $1.5 (₦2000) For 2 Members17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jun 2026, 16:43 UTCFinal Results9 voters

About To Run The Next Task! Should the next reward be $0.5 for 4 members or $1 for 2 members.

  1. $0.5 For 422%
  2. $1 For 289%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œDruxAMB πŸ§‘πŸ½β€πŸ’»β€ (@druxambchannel), 1,100 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/druxambchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.