Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Drun Soft

Channel

Drun Soft

@drunsoft

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

16,554subscribers

+6,646 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003934440232
TypeChannel
Username@drunsoft
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/drunsoft

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,90616,55413,2307 August 2026 — 9,908 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,908 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,906 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,124 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,169 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,276 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,790 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,492 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,648 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,768 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,818 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,847 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,876 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,915 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,939 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,961 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,999 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,007 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,060 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,244 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,453 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,609 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,764 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,045 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,221 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,296 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,350 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,371 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,422 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,613 subscribers3 October 2026 — 14,144 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,597 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,554 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 66 days, net +6,646. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,909–17,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 19:2116,554+1,957
8 Oct 2026, 08:3614,597+453
3 Oct 2026, 22:2114,144+531
25 Sept 2026, 00:5713,613+191
18 Sept 2026, 18:4013,422+51
16 Sept 2026, 08:0013,371+21
14 Sept 2026, 17:2013,350+54
13 Sept 2026, 06:5713,296+75
11 Sept 2026, 12:1713,221+176
8 Sept 2026, 21:5813,045+281
5 Sept 2026, 17:5612,764+155
3 Sept 2026, 16:4112,609+156
2 Sept 2026, 11:1312,453+209
1 Sept 2026, 07:3812,244+184
31 Aug 2026, 07:0612,060+34
30 Aug 2026, 04:4612,026+19
29 Aug 2026, 04:0212,007+8
28 Aug 2026, 06:2411,999+38
27 Aug 2026, 05:0411,961+22
26 Aug 2026, 02:1211,939first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 71 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 52s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,662 reactions across 71 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,15138.0%
custom 54113128891789234341,84232.5%
custom 54136465252994692084017.08%
😭2574.54%
❤‍🔥2193.87%
👍2013.55%
👎1152.03%
👏711.25%
😢711.25%
🔥601.06%
🆒370.653%
😎200.353%
🥰200.353%
😡180.318%
💘160.283%
🤝150.265%
🤬150.265%
🐳130.23%
🍌120.212%
🤩120.212%
27 further kinds961.70%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,662 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
87
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 71 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drunsoft. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 05:46 UTC≈2,110 views50 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Именно благодаря каналу ArtOS_mods , следующим проектом будет красный друн. Разумеется после обновы на двп и пц. Те, чей вариант проиграл - не расстраивайтесь, я не моджанг, и в следующем голосовании будут все проигравшие кандидаты + несколько новых

❤41👎4👏3🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,910 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Когда я чистил место на сервере бурмалдэша то ии удалил все песни а он должен был удалить те которые не использовались из за этого на уровнях не качаются песни

❤25🤬9😭7🤨1

1 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,260 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Druns VS Pakost 1.6.8 - на iOS -Исправлен текст ачивок https://t.me/ArtOS_mods

❤6🤯1

1 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,270 views17 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
File

Druns VS Pakost 1.6.8 - на Android -Исправлен текст ачивок https://t.me/ArtOS_mods

❤‍🔥12❤2💘2🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTC≈3,180 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026

От него новые моды пока что не будут выходить ведь у него сломался HDD (диск)

❤17👎1💔1

31 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈3,900 views44 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Какой мод @Tortonchik делать дальше?

  1. NFS 199422%
  2. Drun Planet Navsegda29%
  3. Bully14%
  4. FIFA26☠️☠️☠️ (не буду делать) (а может и буду)24%
  5. ProgressBar 9511%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤38😐6

31 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,080 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Если у Вас ошибка установки "Несовместимость с другим пакетом" - удалите старую версию Druns VS Pakost", и скачайте новую. Иначе никак.

❤26😢4👾2🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈4,030 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Druns VS Pakost 1.6.7 - на ПК -Новые текстуры https://t.me/ArtOS_mods

❤15

30 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC≈4,320 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Новостник по бурмалдэшу (не наш) - https://t.me/BD_News_Freshik

❤24👍5❤‍🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC≈4,190 views55 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Бурмалдэш снова работает! Я поудалял песни которые нигде не использовались

❤52❤‍🔥3

29 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈4,700 views203 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Скоро будет новая игра от Dynamic druns под названием burmald Jump

❤166❤‍🔥18👍10🔥6🍌3

29 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈4,410 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Делать Drun Royale вместо Burmal Stars?

  1. Да67%
  2. Нет33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥20😈4❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @drunsoft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@drunsoft edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTCAnonymous Poll1,310 voters approx.

Какой мод @Tortonchik делать дальше?

  1. NFS 199422%
  2. Drun Planet Navsegda29%
  3. Bully14%
  4. FIFA26☠️☠️☠️ (не буду делать) (а может и буду)24%
  5. ProgressBar 9511%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTCFinal Results1,270 voters approx.

Делать Drun Royale вместо Burmal Stars?

  1. Да67%
  2. Нет33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTCFinal Results220 voters

Либо всё таки сделать чтобы можно было со всеми игроками в ежедневных и еженедельных гонках?

  1. Да86%
  2. Нет14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTCFinal Results974 voters

Нужен ли вам Burmal Stars

  1. Да78%
  2. Отказано22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Drun Soft” (@drunsoft), 16,554 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drunsoft.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.