Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DigitalResistance.dog

@drproxy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

187,605subscribers

-1,832 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166192362
TypeChannel
Username@drproxy
Created28 May 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drproxy

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

187,605189,437188,5215 August 2026 — 189,437 subscribers6 August 2026 — 189,437 subscribers6 August 2026 — 189,179 subscribers8 August 2026 — 188,862 subscribers8 August 2026 — 188,688 subscribers10 August 2026 — 188,384 subscribers11 August 2026 — 188,134 subscribers12 August 2026 — 187,807 subscribers12 August 2026 — 187,605 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,832. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 187,330–189,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:26187,605-202
12 Aug 2026, 01:22187,807-327
11 Aug 2026, 01:33188,134-250
10 Aug 2026, 00:31188,384-304
8 Aug 2026, 23:30188,688-174
8 Aug 2026, 00:11188,862-317
6 Aug 2026, 23:43189,179-258
6 Aug 2026, 01:31189,437no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:38189,437first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

173,652 reactions across 18 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍68,55239.5%
37,51021.6%
💩11,1736.43%
😢5,8313.36%
👎5,6783.27%
👏5,4253.12%
🔥4,6922.70%
🥰3,2761.89%
🗿2,9751.71%
🤔2,7461.58%
🤮2,6931.55%
❤‍🔥2,4341.40%
😁1,9841.14%
🤯1,7030.981%
🎉1,6890.973%
🖕1,5600.898%
😱1,2280.707%
🍾1,2010.692%
🍓1,1890.685%
🤩1,1000.633%
19 further kinds9,0135.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173,652reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2020 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
448
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 18 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
245
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drproxy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2020 to 16 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 16:26 UTC≈51,000 views355 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Интересная история по мотивам «временной» блокировки Telegram в Индии: товарищи из крупнейшего оператора в Индии совсем не брезгуют тем, чтобы использовать BGP Hijacking. И делают они это отнюдь не только в своей стране, но и просто во все стороны анонсируют. К сожалению, в мире далеко не все научились фильтровать анонсы по ROA и RPKI. За такое надо сильно бить по голове и желательно ногами. И не особо ясно: они пыта

174😐103🤔17🔥14🍌8👀8🕊7😁7

12 Feb 2026, 16:57 UTC≈240,000 views2,508 reactions129 Starsread 12 August 2026

Соскучились? Я честно говоря - нет. Нормально же общались, да? Принёс вам потестить как оно в целом вообще, помогает или нет? https://t.me/proxy?server=exp.proxy.digitalresistance.dog&port=443&secret=eed41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8322e7777772E676F6F676C652E636F6D Но вообще, у меня для вас плохие новости. Господа из РФ серьёзно подготовились к блокировкам. Теперь они работают быстрее, гибче, технически оснащённее и к

🔥987598🫡426😭164😢91💔58🕊45🤔40

31 Oct 2023, 16:34 UTC≈4,040,000 views32,224 reactions245 Starsread 12 August 2026

I've got information that proxy is not required anymore in the Southern part of Russia. That's good news. Do not forget to disable proxy. Telegram is always faster without proxies or VPN. Except when it's blocked by governments..

14,300👍7,120🗿2,350❤‍🔥1,650👎1,240🍾1,030🙏931👏901

31 Oct 2023, 10:44 UTC≈3,820,000 views16,582 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026

An update has been rolled out, stability and quality of the proxy should have increased drastically.

👍5,9103,130🖕1,560🤮1,110😍811🍓755❤‍🔥746💘711

31 Oct 2023, 09:57 UTC≈3,320,000 views9,462 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Poll

My region is:

  1. Somehow connected or close to Dagestan(Stavropol, Krasnodar, Rostov, etc)40%
  2. Not even close to Southern Regions6%
  3. Any big city like Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk.10%
  4. Other19%
  5. Not from Russia, want to check the results24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3,270👍1,880💩648🗿625🤬573🍓434🥱413🥰412

31 Oct 2023, 09:52 UTC≈2,170,000 views4,326 reactions52 Starsread 12 August 2026

And here we go again: A huge spike in users from Russia and now it affects stability of the proxy (I'm going to solve it asap, but no ETA however). Meanwhile, can you explain what part of Russia you are from? Just to understand what's going on.

1,720👍967😭335👎268🤷‍♂179🍾171🔥150🐳147

12 Apr 2022, 23:35 UTC≈5,380,000 views52,320 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Good night, everyone. Very important announcement: Proxy will NOT be working in the next few hours due to maintenance works. Be sure you disabled proxy if you want to use Telegram in the meantime. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks.

👍27,8006,920😢5,740💩3,810👎1,630🔥1,220🤔1,130🎉1,020

26 Dec 2021, 15:16 UTC≈5,340,000 views12,416 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Invoice

Invoice, posted without a caption

👍4,960💩1,7901,390👎684🤮638🥰510🤔503🤩496

26 Dec 2021, 15:16 UTC≈4,480,000 views8,578 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

The New Year is coming! The last one was not so bad, we've adapted to Covid restrictions, and started to travel again, to plan our future instead of hiding and being scared. Some of us have been vaccinated, others rejected to be vaccinated. And it's OK. I mean, when did we forget about the most important thing - freedom? We want to be able to discuss whatever we want to, to choose the way we live our lives and like

👍4,1701,180💩1,060👎370🤮330🔥268🥰268🤔247

3 Nov 2021, 15:22 UTC≈3,870,000 views4,239 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

It's official. Government of Uzbekistan has blocked/limited Telegram and some other services. https://pd.gov.uz/spoiler/?type=spoiler In channel comments somebody mentioned that they blocked also Telegram.com, which has nothing common with Telegram ;) It's funny. Update: Some reports claim everything is back to normal in Uzbekistan.

👍1,980💩639599🤬155👎151🤮132🔥127🤔123

16 Aug 2021, 16:11 UTC≈4,640,000 views5,220 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I've just got an info that Uzbekistan has blocked Telegram. You're welcome to the party, guys. The best proxies for you are: Main proxy(DD/Random Padding): tg://proxy?server=proxy.digitalresistance.dog&port=443&secret=ddd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e TLS Proxy: tg://proxy?server=exp.proxy.digitalresistance.dog&secret=7tQdjNmPALIE6YAJmOz4Mi53d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ&port=443

👍2,270💩554486🥰422👏370😁257👎223🔥218

14 Jul 2021, 14:11 UTC≈4,680,000 views3,573 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Different countries - same problems. And i'm talking about Cuba, a lot of users from Cuba have joined to our small proxy community in a last few days. Please, would be great to have any feedback about current situation on your Island. Don't hesistate to write comment, and to PM feedback bot. I've also heard that built-in feature in Telegram clients was activated today and many users got access back without proxy,

👍1,890449💩431👎153🤬108🥰105👏101🤮101

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drproxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Oct 2023, 09:57 UTCAnonymous Poll57,000 voters approx.

My region is:

  1. Somehow connected or close to Dagestan(Stavropol, Krasnodar, Rostov, etc)40%
  2. Not even close to Southern Regions6%
  3. Any big city like Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk.10%
  4. Other19%
  5. Not from Russia, want to check the results24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2020, 19:49 UTCFinal Results2,410,000 voters approx.

За кого Вы проголосовали на выборах президента Республики Беларусь?

  1. Андрей Дмитриев1%
  2. Анна Канопацкая0%
  3. Александр Лукашенко4%
  4. Светлана Тихановская51%
  5. Сергей Черечень1%
  6. Против всех4%
  7. Я из Беларуси, но не голосовал9%
  8. Я не из Беларуси32%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2020 to 16 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 359,506 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DigitalResistance.dog” (@drproxy), 187,605 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drproxy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.