Channel
@drmohammadrezajabbari
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,764subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001455980265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drmohammadrezajabbari |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drmohammadrezajabbari |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,764 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 1,766 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:40 | 1,763 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1,763 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 December 2025 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,086 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
745 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 514 | 69.0% | |
| 👍 | 136 | 18.3% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 3.49% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 2.28% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 1.61% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 1.21% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.94% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 0.805% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.671% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.537% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.537% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.403% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.268% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 745reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هرچی بیشتر تلاش میکنی، بیشتر توی بازیِ اون گیر میافتی. اگر طرف مقابلت ویژگیهای خودشیفتگی داره، بعضی کارها فقط به نفع اونه؛ مثل بحث کردن، توضیح دادن یا تلاش برای قانع کردنش. توی این ویدیو میبینی در برابر یک خودشیفته چه کارهایی رو بهتره انجام ندی. @drmohammadrezajabbari #خودشیفته #اختلال_شخصیت_خودشیفته #NPD #روابط_سمی #روانشناسی
❤14👏6👍1
توی رابطه چی درسته؟ چی غلط؟ با رعایت این اصول ساده، رابطه رو تبدیل کنید به محل آرامش و حال خوب✨❤️ . @drmohammadrezajabbari
❤23👍3
سوتفاهمهایی که یه عاشق مضطرب، توی رابطه دچارش میشه… @drmohammadrezajabbari
❤20😭2👍1😍1
«من آدم وابستهای نیستم.» گاهی این جمله از اعتمادبهنفس نمیاد؛ از سالها عادت به تنها موندن میاد. اگر وقتی کسی زیادی بهت نزدیک میشه، ناخودآگاه فاصله میگیری یا ترجیح میدی همهچیز رو خودت حل کنی، شاید این ویدیو برات آشنا باشه. @drmohammadrezajabbari✨
❤23
دلبستگی اضطرابی از کجا میاد و چجوری ادامه پیدا میکنه؟ . @drmohammadrezajabbari ✨
❤28
رهایی از انتظار اگه میخوای از این چرخه بیای بیرون، در مرحلهی اول باید یه سوال از خودت بپرسی: این انتظاری که از پارتنرت داری، ار کجا میاد؟ اگه از یار رابطهی عاطفیت میخوای شفاف و صادقانه حرفاش رو بزنه، درخواست معقوله. اما اگه نگران این میشی که چرا ده دقیقهست جواب نداده یا خیلی بهت نزدیک نیست باید بدونی که این اضطرابته، نه نیاز منطقی در رابطه. مهمه که فرق این دو تا موضوع رو یاد بگیری و شناساییشون کنی. اگه نیازت…
❤27👍4👏1
آدمهای اضطرابی و اجتنابی، هر کدوم دنیا رو چطور میبینن؟ . @drmohmmadrezajabbari✨
❤26
📍یه اضطرابی چطور رابطه رو نابود میکنه؟ هر چیزی که بهش میگن رو انقدر توی ذهنش تحلیل میکنه که در نهایت خودش رابطه رو میبره به سمت جدایی خودش رو با هر کسی مقایسه میکنه و خیلی زود حسادتش تحریک میشه دائم دنبال مطمئن شدنه و این موضوع به پارتنزش احساس خفگی میده همه چیز پارتنرش رو زیر نظر داره و در مورد هر تصمیمی که اون میگیره توی ذهنش قصه میسازه پارتنرش میشه مرکز دنیاش و خودش رو گم میکنه توی ذهنش سناریوهای مخت…
❤22👍7
خوبه که مدیران ارشد و بنیانگذارهای کسبوکار از خودشون یه سوال بپرسن: شما کسبوکارتون رو ساختید که زندگی بهتری داشته باشید، یا زندگیتون رو دادید که فقط کسبوکارتون بزرگتر بشه؟ مرز بین این دو، گاهی خیلی باریکه. @drmohammadrezajabbari 🌸 کانال دکتر محمدرضا جباری، زوجدرمانگر، کارآفرین و متخصص روانشناسی از دانشگاه تهران
❤16👍5
یکی از بزرگترین نشونههای ترومای کودکی در بزرگسالی، اینه که به جای «فاصله گرفتن»از افرادی که به ما آسیب رسوندن؛ سعی میکنیم «متقاعدشون کنیم» که با ما خوب رفتار کنند، ما را رها نکنند و همواره تاییدمون کنند. 🔹 @drmohammadrezajabbari
❤33💔15👍10👌4👏1
اگر واکنش تو، شدیدتر از اتفاقات باشد؛ بدان داستان، داستانِ امروز نیست... @drmohammadrezajabbari
❤27👍12
🔵«بعضی مدیرها عاشق کار نیستند؛ از خانه فرار میکنند!» گاهی غرق شدن در کار، از علاقه به کار نمیآید؛ از نخواستنِ مواجهه با چیزی میآید که بیرون از محل کار منتظر ماست. ❌واقعیت این است که حالِ یک مدیر را فقط از نتایج کسبوکارش نمیشود فهمید؛ ✅باید دید وقتی از کار برمیگردد، حالِ زندگیاش چطور است. 👈در این بخش از دوره «خوشاحوالی سازمانی»، دکتر جباری از جایی حرف میزند که کمتر در مدیریت دربارهاش صحبت میشود: 🔹اینکه ر…
👍15❤13👏3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drmohammadrezajabbari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 178,248 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@drmohammadrezajabbari named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr jabbari | دکتر محمدرضا جباری” (@drmohammadrezajabbari), 1,764 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drmohammadrezajabbari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.