3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 978–988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 02:35
987
+5
7 Aug 2026, 15:57
982
+3
6 Aug 2026, 18:02
979
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
60.5%
avg views ÷ 987 subscribers
Avg views / post
597
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (24 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
11,934
Reactions total
367
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
367 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
176
48.0%
👍
57
15.5%
🤣
52
14.2%
💔
48
13.1%
🙏
10
2.72%
👌
9
2.45%
👏
8
2.18%
👎
4
1.09%
🔥
2
0.545%
🥴
1
0.272%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دستور موردی برای تفتیش خودروها
یکی از قواعد مهم در تحقیقات مقدماتی آن است که دستور مقام قضایی باید به صورت موردی باشد. مقام قضایی نمیتواند به عنوان مثال دستور دهد که همه خودروها در ورودی شهر مورد تفتیش قرار بگیرند.
به این موضوع در ماده ۱۴۱ قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری اشاره شده است:
«دستور مقام قضائی برای ورود به منازل، اماکن بسته و تعطیل، تحت هر عنوان باید موردی باشد و موضوعی که تفتیش برای آن صورت میگیرد، زمان، دفعا…
سلام به همراهان گرامی!
امشب کسی از من سوالی پرسیده که آن را با شما به اشتراک میگذارم.
شخصی محکوم شده است به نود و یک روز حبس (حداکثر مجازات دو سال بوده). حالا میخواهد تسلیم به رای بزند که کمتر از نود و یک روز شود.
در چنین فرضی آیا اعمال تبصره ماده 6 قانون کاهش در مورد وی الزامی است؟
« تبصره - چنانچه در اجرای مقررات این ماده یا سایر مقرراتی که به موجب آن مجازات تخفیف می یابد، حکم به حبس کمتر از نود و یک روز صادر ش…
فی التاخیر آفات!
یکی از عادات ناپسندی که در میان برخی از ما وکلا وجود دارد تاخیر انداختن ارائه لایحه در فرجه قانونی و انجام آن در واپسین لحظات است.
من بارها با این موضوع مواجه شدهام. چند وقت پیش همکاری در یک محفل مجازی قصهاش را تعریف میکرد که در تجدید نظرخواهی از یک رای در روز آخر با اختلال سامانه مواجه شده و چون دادخواست تجدید نظرخواهی رد شده بود، ناچار شده بود با ضمیمه کردن استعلام از انفورماتیک و... عذر خود …
امروز داشتم به فرض جالبتری فکر میکردم.
اگر فرض کنیم بازپرس اعتقاد به صدور قرار بازداشت موقت داشته باشد و دادستان مخالف باشد، مطابق با قواعد، لازم است پرونده جهت حل اختلاف به دادگاه ارسال شود.
آن گاه اگر دادگاه نظر به صدور قرار بازداشت داشته باشد، این قرار باید به متهم ابلاغ گردد و متهم ظرف ده روز حق اعتراض دارد. مرجع رسیدگی به اعتراض هم همان دادگاه است.
حالا بیایید فرض کنیم که همان شعبهی پیشین جهت رسیدگی به اعتراض…
قضات جوان فرهیخته
پروندهای با موضوع شروع به کلاهبرداری داشتم که با منع تعقیب مواجه شد. پیرو اعتراض من، پرونده در دادگاه کیفری دو ثبت شد. برای پیگیری به شعبه مراجعه کردم. گفتم جناب قاضی! این پرونده مصداق قانون تفسیری ۱۳۱۴ است. قاضی جوان لبخندی زد و گفت شما اولین وکیلی هستید که به این قانون اشاره میکنید. ندیده بودم کسی التفاتی به این قانون داشته باشد. آمدم بگویم من خیلی پسر خوبی هستم و چیزهای بیشتری هم راجع به این ق…
یاد روزهای اول جنگ میافتم که با چه دردسری کانفیگ تهیه میکردیم تا اخبار را دنبال کنیم و ببینیم طرف ایرانی یا آمریکایی چه گفته است.
الان تا اسم ترامپ، روبیو، قالیباف، عراقچی و... را میبینم اسکرول میکنم که حتی تیتر حرفهایشان را هم نبینم.
این کار حتماً برای سلامت روان مناسبتر است.
نسل سوخته
من به عنوان یک دهه شصتی در این سالها مانند دیگران همیشه نسل خود را «نسل سوخته» مینامیدم. انتخاب این عنوان، خیلی بیراه هم نبود. ما نسلی بودیم که امید و آرزوهایمان یکی پس از دیگری دفن شد. حسرت تولد در دوره زمانی دیگر، به گمانم وجه اشتراک بسیاری از افراد این نسل است. چه میشود کرد. با تقدیر که نمیشود جنگید.
رنجهای بیشمار و بازی با روح و روان این نسل که هر روز در انتظار فردای بهتر بود و هرگز نشد، شرایطی …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drmohammadniazi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 605,767 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمد نیازی” (@drmohammadniazi), 987 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drmohammadniazi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.