https://x.com/roohallahj/status/2083854921363800123?s=20

Channel
دكتر هادى انصارى
@drhadiansarii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,312subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001103446338 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drhadiansarii |
| Created | 20 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drhadiansarii |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 1,312 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 1,313 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 1,314 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 1,313 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,312 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 1,315 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,315 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,312 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 132
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.35%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (31 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,978 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://x.com/roohallahj/status/2083982458416922851?s=20
✔️ این حسین کیست که عالم همه دیوانهی اوست... 🔻دکتر سید #حمید_خویی #اربعین #امام_حسین علیهالسلام 🆗 @Shahrah
خدمت در جاده عشق، در مسیر منتهی به کربلای حسین(ع)، افتخاری است که با هیچ معیار دنیایی سنجیده نمیشود. چه سعادتی بالاتر از آنکه رهتوشه عاشقان اباعبدالله(ع) باشی و غبار خستگی را از چهره زائرانش بزدایی. لحظههایی که در این راه نورانی، خالصانه به زائران سیدالشهدا(ع) خدمت میشود، دیگر جزو عمر انسان به شمار نمیآید؛ چرا که این لحظات، رنگ جاودانگی گرفته و در دفتر کرامت الهی ثبت میشود. خوشا آنان که توفیق یافتهاند در مسیر…
Video, posted without a caption
https://x.com/roohallahj/status/2083537098565435603?s=20
Photo, posted without a caption
بسمه تعالی از تربت کربلا تا صحن رضوی؛ روایت امانتی که بوی عاشورا میدهد. با سلام و عرض ادب و احترام حدود یک سال پیش، همزمان با سفر حضرت حجتالاسلام و المسلمین جناب آقای مروی، تولیت معزز آستان قدس رضوی، به منظور تشرف به عتبات عالیات، دیدارهایی با متولیان شرعی حرمهای مطهر حضرت اباعبدالله الحسین و حضرت ابوالفضل العباس علیهماالسلام در کربلای معلی انجام پذیرفت. در یکی از این دیدارها، معظمله پیشنهادی ارزشمند و معنوی…
جناب آقای دکترانصاری آیااین خبرصحت دارد ؟ تاآنجا که درروایات ماآمده قدسیت تربت کربلا ریشه در مقدس بودن خون مطهر امام حسین ع ویارانش دارد، فقهای ما همواره براین نکته تأکیدداشته اند که نباید ساحت قدسی یا خون شهدا رابه ابزاری برای کسب درآمدتبدیل کرد وقتی پای صدتن خاک به میان می آید مادیگربایک تبرک یا یک باوراعتقادی روبه رو نیستیم بلکه بایک پروژه اقتصادی احتمالا مکروه یادستِ کم ناپسند روبروهستیم ، این حجم ازجابه جایی خا…
بسمه تعالی با سلام و عرض ادب و احترام حدود یک سال پیش، همزمان با سفر حضرت حجتالاسلام و المسلمین جناب آقای مروی، تولیت معزز آستان قدس رضوی، به منظور تشرف به عتبات عالیات، دیدارهایی با متولیان شرعی حرمهای مطهر حضرت اباعبدالله الحسین و حضرت ابوالفضل العباس علیهماالسلام در کربلای معلی انجام پذیرفت. در یکی از این دیدارها، معظمله پیشنهادی ارزشمند و معنوی را مطرح فرمودند که مورد استقبال و موافقت متولیان دو عتبه مقدسه…
این نوشتار، نقدی مستند بر ادعای «اربعین دروغین» و شیوه غیرعلمیِ تحلیل اصالت زیارت اربعین است. نویسنده نشان میدهد که مخالفان با خلط میان تاریخ، حدیث، فقه و جامعهشناسی، از اختلاف در برخی گزارشهای تاریخی، به انکار یک شعیره ریشهدار دینی رسیدهاند. این مقاله با تکیه بر منابع معتبر حدیثی، فقهی و تاریخی، اصالت زیارت اربعین و پیشینه دیرینه آن را اثبات میکند و میان اصل مشروعیت اربعین و برخی مباحث تاریخی یا اجتماعی تفکیک …
[اربعین حسینی؛ حقیقتی فراتر از تحریف] یادداشتی در اصالت زیارت اربعین و نقد علمی ادعای وقیحانه ی «اربعین دروغین» بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم در هر پژوهش تاریخی و دینی، نخستین شرط دستیابی به حقیقت، رعایت انصاف، امانت علمی و شناخت دقیق روشهای تحقیق است. تاریخ، حدیث، فقه و جامعهشناسی، هر یک قلمرو و معیارهای خاص خود را دارند و خلط میان این حوزهها، پژوهش را از مسیر علمی خارج میسازد. اخیراً متنی بسیار ضعیف، نسنجیده و غیر …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @drhadiansarii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,430,941 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zakerinir · 46,516
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
@vpncloakify · 124,531
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دكتر هادى انصارى” (@drhadiansarii), 1,312 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drhadiansarii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.