Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

коллаба мечты

@dream_collab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,098subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002147963635
TypeChannel
Username@dream_collab
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dream_collab

Growth

1,0971,0991,0986 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,097–1,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:051,098+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:151,097-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:271,098-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:181,099no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:451,099first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 1,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
244
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (26 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,218
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7253.7%
❤‍🔥3425.4%
💘139.70%
💔85.97%
🥰75.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC131 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Много-много я думаю о том, как сегодня жить с маркетингом, но не сдаваться ИИ-революции, не выдумывать потребности, а потом продукт, а потом и рекламу ему просто потому что все побежали и мы бежим, как не множить вот это ощущение фейк на фейк на фейк, какая вообще человеческая задача у бренд- и маркетинг- труда. В общем, я в большом заплыве внутрь себя в поиске ответов и своего места в этой истории. Говорят, что еще

10❤‍🔥1💘1

28 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC250 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

глава 1, в которой мы придумываем лимитированный аромат, атакуем книжные магазины и печатаем отельные дорхенгеры Это рубрика #коллаба_инсайд и старт серии колонок Леры Бургучевой, продюсерки в опии, бренд-менеджерки и коллаб-специалистки Выкса-фестиваля 2026 коллаборации, где рождаются предметы — самый любимый и одновременно самый ненавидимый всеми коллаб-специалистами вид коллабораций у нас было 2.5 месяца, небол

10❤‍🔥4💘4

24 Jul 2026, 11:52 UTC257 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

24 коллаборации Выкса-фестиваля за 2,5 месяца 💜Как это было? От первого лица! Это будет самый развернутый #коллаба_инсайд в истории! Мы пообщались с Лерой Бургучевой, моей коллегой по опии, бренд-менеджеркой и коллаб-специалисткой Выкса-фестиваля 2026 в составе команды Doing Great Agency. Именно она реализовала все эти коллабы для фестиваля. А еще она рассказала все-все о процессе создания такого нереального объема

19❤‍🔥13💘8💔2

22 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC278 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Музей русского импрессионизма — спортивный! Как же спорт шагает по стране, как же искусство светит в любые времена… Музей русского импрессионизма и Rock the Cycle (кстати, команда с ооочень уверенной коллаб-репутацией!) запускают специальные велотренировки с билетами в музей для победителей и совместные пробежки с экскурсией по выставке и маршрутом, вдохновлённым историей района. Я не сразу поняла концепт мэтча, но

6

16 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC302 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Креативный директор Гжельского завода — о коллаб-стратегии для художественного промысла Наверняка вы видели десятки коллабораций ГФЗ с самыми разнобразными брендами — косметика, попкорн, HoReCa, фешен, видеоигры. Как же удалось традиционному заводу промысла выйти на коллаб-рынок, а главное — зачем и оправдываются ли амбизиозные ожидания? Отвечает на каверзные вопросы Настя Праведнова — креативный директор Гжельског

❤‍🔥115💔2

14 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC≈2,460 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Девайс для фейс-массажа от Гжельского завода, фарфоровый! Неискоренимая вятская часть меня (мой хоумтаун — родина дымковской игрушки) всегда чувствует что-то нежное от ремесленных коллаб. При этом гжель-коллабы у меня каждый раз вызывают прям разные чувства (или никаких) но эта понравилась из-за сказочного фарфорового гуаша-скребка, каждый в дропе расписан вручную. Набор косметики отсылает к фарфоровой рифме: фарф

11🥰7

9 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC310 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Чтобы коллабе мечты случиться, ей нужен лидер Всегда это говорю на консультациях, когда обсуждаем инициативность и степень вклада партнеров и напряжение вокруг этого процесса. Да, многие очень расстраиваются, когда вклад партеров меньше — и это нормальное и полезное чувство для прояснения задач. Но вот же ж что. Можно было бы сказать, что один лидер у коллабы 2+ брендов — это контринтуитивно. Мы ж тут вместе, все д

❤‍🔥4💔4

26 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC362 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Зацепилась я за подвеску-ключ, сделанного с рисунка из дневников Андрея Тарковского в коллабе кинофестиваля Зеркало и бренда SHU SHA. Сначала подумала, что хочу. Потом от съемки возникло легкое ощущение паблика Филологическая дева, кто помнит тот помнит. Ощущение это настораживающее. Вот если бы снять не в духе лукбуков пинтерестных, а в естестенной, завораживающей, заколдованной манее, которая духу этого предмета

6❤‍🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC314 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @leepotaaPhoto

|коллаборация| — SHU SHA х кинофестиваль «Зеркало. Философия Тарковского» Ребята выпустили подвеску-ключ. Образ этого ключа они нашли в личном дневнике Андрея Тарковского. Дизайнеры: «Среди его зарисовок был замечен простой, почти наивный рисунок; линии, проведённые рукой самого режиссёра, стали основой формы объекта. В этом образе можно увидеть черты реального ключа: к сталкеровской «комнате желаний», к «зеркальн

5

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dream_collab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 331,263 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“коллаба мечты” (@dream_collab), 1,098 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dream_collab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.