4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,576–1,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:08
1,578
+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:21
1,577
-4
6 Aug 2026, 15:43
1,581
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:04
1,581
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
202 reactions across 15 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
120
59.4%
👍
19
9.41%
❤🔥
16
7.92%
✍
9
4.46%
🔥
8
3.96%
custom 5787269329561063435
6
2.97%
👌
5
2.48%
👀
3
1.49%
🤓
3
1.49%
👏
2
0.99%
custom 5188523959053733713
1
0.495%
custom 5249375098653133072
1
0.495%
custom 5366096482803917663
1
0.495%
🆒
1
0.495%
🐳
1
0.495%
👾
1
0.495%
💊
1
0.495%
💘
1
0.495%
😎
1
0.495%
😭
1
0.495%
1 further kind
1
0.495%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
частичное или полное помутнение вещества или капсулы хрусталика.
Симптомы
⏺️Чаще медленное и безболезненное снижение остроты зрения вдаль и вблизи
⏺️Изменение рефракции в сторону миопии
⏺️Блики и ореолы вокруг светящихся объектов
⏺️Сниженное сумеречное зрение
⏺️Снижение контрастной и цветовой чувствительности
Факторы риска
⏺️Сахарный диабет
⏺️Использование стероидов
⏺️УФ излучение
⏺️Курение
⏺️Травма г…
❤️Разбираемся
1️⃣ Все начинается со сбора жалоб и анамнеза
2️⃣ Потом мы анализируем текущую привычную коррекцию
3️⃣ Затем делаем авторефрактометрию - получаем примерные значения рефракции
Этот чек не является рецептом на очки или контактные линзы
4️⃣ И вот тут начинается самое интересное - мы смотрим на табличку с буквами/цифрами/другими оптотипами без нее никуда
👀 Проверяем остроту зрения каждого глаза по отдел…
Когда предсказуемость спасает или как подготовиться к приему офтальмолога ребенку с РАС
Актуальность
Офтальмологический прием один из самых сложных приемов в плане важности обратной связи.
Масса тестов на проверку зрения, и большинство из них требуют субъективных ответов от пациента.
На приеме офтальмологи используют весь свой арсенал для более точной диагностики нарушений зрения.
Это может быть утомительно для л…
А что делать, если ребёнок совсем никак не общается?
Если ни вербальные, ни альтернативные методов коммуникации пока недоступны, мы все равно можем проверить зрение и состояние глаза
Проверка зрения включает в себя объективное (для которого не нужна обратная связь от пациента) и субъективное (для которого обратная связь нужна) исследование
Объективно:
Авторефрактометрия - прибор с воздушным шариком или домиком
Р…
В данный момент пишу важный пост про то, как проходит прием у офтальмолога для детей с расстройством аутистического спектра
Что важно знать родителям и врачу и как подготовиться, чтобы консультация прошла максимально эффективно
Пишу уже несколько недель, много читаю и слушаю умных людей
Скоро будет готов
Вам рассказываю, чтобы не забросить и все-таки закончить(внутренний критик разгулялся)
Верю, что даже если это…
Атрофия зрительного нерва
🧬Наступает вследствие гибели его нервных волокон (аксонов ганглиозных клеток), что приводит к снижению всех зрительных функций (вплоть до полной слепоты) и побледнению диска зрительного нерва
❗️Некоторые авторы предлагают термин «оптическая нейропатия», что чуть более правильно с патофизиологической точки зрения
Частичная атрофия зрительного нерва
❓Не очень корректная формулировка, котор…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drdunaitseva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 13 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,624 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr.Dunaitseva. Понятная офтальмология👁️” (@drdunaitseva), 1,578 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drdunaitseva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
