Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 닥터다빈치 투자이야기

Channel

닥터다빈치 투자이야기

@drdavinci1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,822subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209590067
TypeChannel
Username@drdavinci1
Created21 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drdavinci1

Growth

1,8221,8261,8247 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,825 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,821–1,827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:281,822-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:341,824-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:281,825-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:331,826no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:251,826first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

242 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15965.7%
👍8334.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 27 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2025, 12:26 UTC≈3,100 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

투자는 단순히 인기 있는 주식을 선택하거나 다음 '대박'을 찾는 것이 아닙니다. 그것은 기업이 진정으로 장기적으로 가치를 창출하고 유지할 수 있는지 이해하는 것입니다. #마이클모부신

👍132

26 Mar 2025, 01:54 UTC≈7,890 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

무슨 일을 시작하든 된다는 확신 90%와 반드시 되게 할 수 있다는 자신감 10% 외에 안 될 수도 있다는 불안은 단 1%도 갖지 말라. #정주영

👍124

22 Mar 2025, 22:46 UTC≈4,540 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

역사적으로 보면 최고의 수익을 올린 투자자는 시장 평균보다 훨씬 높게 성장한 소수의 기업들을 찾아낸 사람들. 이런 기업들은 경영진이 광범위한 성장 계획을 가지고 있다. #필립피셔

👍112

18 Mar 2025, 23:26 UTC≈13,000 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

모든 훌륭한 투자는 불편함에서 시작한다. 모두가 좋아하고 편하게 느끼는 것들이 할인 매장에 있을 가능성은 낮기 때문이다. #하워드막스

👍9

17 Mar 2025, 03:29 UTC≈2,790 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

어차피 증여를 할 것이라면 미리 미리 해두는 것이 최선이라 생각합니다. 꾸준한 투자 수익률까지 더해지면 금상첨화. https://m.blog.naver.com/cashcat_90/223797873584

4

15 Mar 2025, 23:34 UTC≈2,600 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

가장 좋은 투자 대상은 복잡한 밸류에이션 작업이 따로 필요 없을 만큼 딱 봤을 때 지나치게 싼 종목이다. #한국형가치투자

👍6

11 Mar 2025, 13:23 UTC≈2,480 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

어느 기업이든 그 기업의 해자를 평가할 때는 <무한한 자금을 가진 현명한 경쟁자>가 있다고 할 경우, 그 경쟁자가 얼마나 빨리 그 해자를 복제할 수 있는지 판단해야 한다. 경쟁자들이 어떤 기업의 성공 비결을 알고 있음에도 불구하고 그것을 복제할 수 없다면, 그 기업은 강력한 해자를 갖고 있는 것이다. #투자도인생도복리처럼

👍4

7 Mar 2025, 15:12 UTC≈2,730 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

확실한 상황에선 최대한 많이 벌고 패가 나쁠 때는 죽는다. 이 규칙을 지키기만 하면 크게 잃지 않는다. 이걸 못 지켜서 문제다. 이것을 반복하고 실력이 있다면 장기간 버는 전략이 된다. #텍사스홀덤

13👍2

6 Mar 2025, 03:44 UTC≈2,260 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

자신이 저지른 실수를 집중해서 바라보라. 그것이야말로 성공 투자라는 목표를 달성하는 가장 확실한 방법이다. #목숨을걸고투자하라

👍146

1 Mar 2025, 09:07 UTC≈5,010 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://m.blog.naver.com/forsword/223779309765 화장품 산업도 꾸준히 관심가지자. 선별만 잘한다면 반복적으로 기회를 줄 것.

4

27 Feb 2025, 23:49 UTC≈7,280 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

투자자에게 가장 필요한 능력은 인내심입니다. 모든 기업은 투자한 후에 여러모로 예상 밖의 결과를 보여줍니다. 그 결과가 때로는 부정적일 수도, 긍정적일 수도 있지만, 보통은 내가 예상한 대로 진행되지 않습니다. 따라서 가장 필요한 자질은 바로 "극도의 인내심"입니다. 두 번째로 중요한 것은 불확실성에 대한 편안함입니다. 리스크(risk)와 불확실성(uncertainty)은 분명히 구분되어야 하는데, 많은 투자자들이 이를 혼동합니다. 즉, 많은 투자자들은 확실성을 원하고, 확실성을 원하다 보면 워렌 버핏이 말한 것처럼 "밝고 쾌활한 합의(consensus)"에 대해 높은 프리미엄을 지불하게 됩니다. 반면, 불확실성이 크더라도 리스크가 낮은 상환에 편안함을 느낀다면, 인내심을 가지고 기다렸을 때 높은 수익을 올릴 수 있습니다. 즉, 리스크는 낮지

14

21 Feb 2025, 10:55 UTC≈2,920 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

수많은 종목이 아니라, 최고의 주식에 전력을 기울여야 한다. 수많은 종목에서 나온 이익을 합쳐도 뛰어난 몇 종목에서 거둔 투자 수익에 훨씬 못 미친다는 사실을 명심해야 한다. #위대한기업에투자하라

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drdavinci1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,436,184 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“닥터다빈치 투자이야기” (@drdavinci1), 1,822 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drdavinci1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.