Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DrAnatomi

Channel

DrAnatomi

@dranatomi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,667subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001873969135
TypeChannel
Username@dranatomi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dranatomi

Growth

9,6659,6679,66612 Sept 2026, 16:47 — 9,665 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 17:22 — 9,665 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 23:36 — 9,667 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 16:4713 Sept 2026, 23:36
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,665–9,667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 23:369,667+2
12 Sept 2026, 17:229,665no change
12 Sept 2026, 16:479,665first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 16 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 9,667 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.634%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held15 (16 August 20252 September 2026)
Views total19,415
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 50s
Average length
18m 50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

294 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25586.7%
🏆134.42%
💯93.06%
🔥72.38%
🥰41.36%
😍20.68%
🎉10.34%
👍10.34%
👏10.34%
🙏10.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC735 views1 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Poll

Klasik ta ıma göre Le Fort kırık tiplerinin tümünde maksilla ile birlikte etkilenen kemik hangisidir?

  1. Os ethmoidale14%
  2. Os lacrimale8%
  3. Os nasale32%
  4. Os sphenodidale30%
  5. Os ethmodiale16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

28 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,330 views2 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

Video from Prof. Dr. Selman DEMİRCİ

1🙏1

28 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,270 views4 reactionsread 12 September 2026

dogrudan referans oldugumuz sorulardan bir seçki...

4

24 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈2,090 views8 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Hepinize gecmis olsun. Anatomide prostat larynx ve hypoglossal sinir sorulari disinda diger sorular gayet guzeldi. klinikte de lateral epikondjlit, maralgia paresthetica, wernicke afazisi ve L4 dermatomu sorulari geldi. Sorular klasik sorulardan farkli ve dağılım her zamanki gibi kötüydü. Spotlarla soru çözmek artik pek mumkun degil gibi. Ama zor sinav herkes icin zordur. Hakkınızda hayırlısı neyse o olsun 👍

6🏆2

22 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,170 views23 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Sınava girecek tüm meslektaşlarıma başarılar diliyorum. Zihniniz açık şansınız bol olsun 👍

23

20 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,630 views29 reactionsread 12 September 2026

sinava girecekler icin 200 maddelik bir check list hizli bir tekrarla cok soru yapabilirsiniz

26🔥2🎉1

8 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,950 views2 reactionsread 12 September 2026

1-2 Ağustos Tus için son viraj... 90 dakikada 30 yılın birikimiyle Yuz yuze, Ankara'da son rötüşları yapacağım. Beklenen sorular ve spotlar. Kaçırmayın.

2

25 Jan 2026, 17:04 UTC≈6,250 views11 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Arkadaşlar merhaba. TTUS ANATOMI yayında ! 2019 EylüI - 2025 EylüI ORİJİNAL ÖSYM TUS Soruları ve Açıklamaları! Prof.Dr.M.Selman Demirci ile kapsamlı Anatomi hazırlığı yapabilirsiniz. ✔️35 Video - 19 Saat Anlatım Detaylı Soru Çözümleri ✔️2019-2025 arası tüm Anatomi TUS soruları Detaylı açıklamalar ve çözümler ✔️Orijinal ÖSYM soruları Sistematik ve hizli öğrenme ✔️Sınava yönelik stratejik yaklaşım ✔️Soru tarzlarını t

8🏆1💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dranatomi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz337 voters

Klasik ta ıma göre Le Fort kırık tiplerinin tümünde maksilla ile birlikte etkilenen kemik hangisidir?

  1. Os ethmoidale14%
  2. Os lacrimale8%
  3. Os nasale32%
  4. Os sphenodidale30%
  5. Os ethmodiale16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2025 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DRPATOLOJİ 🤜
@drpatoloji · 26,408
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 September 2026
Pixorize Videos | USMLE Step 1
@USMLEPixorize · 26,096
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DrAnatomi” (@dranatomi), 9,667 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dranatomi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.