Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 52 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 876–887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 09:00
877
-2
12 Sept 2026, 02:40
879
-3
3 Sept 2026, 16:17
882
-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:15
884
-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:16
885
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:23
886
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:48
886
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
698 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
417
59.7%
👍
117
16.8%
🥰
91
13.0%
👏
25
3.58%
😱
22
3.15%
🤪
13
1.86%
💩
9
1.29%
😢
4
0.573%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 698 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2023 to 1 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💡 Кстати, среднее количество препарата, которое допустимо для безопасного введения в одну губу ЗА ОДИН СЕАНС, не создавая гиперкоррекции, которая может влечь за собой спазм сосудов, поверхностную ишемизацию, ухудшение кровотока и трофики тканей, равняется = 0,5 мл!
☝🏻И то, весь 0,5 можно ввести в ткани с большой емкостью! = Большие от природы губы, с достаточным местом в нужном для работы слое. Для небольших губ эт…
А может все-таки зря мы все это и надо «бомбануть» как следует? 😂
Чего там мелочиться.. девайте сразу по 2 мл в каждую губу!😅
* ( видео принадлежит другому автору и взято из запрещенной сети )
Пациент из категории : «чуточку», «капелюшечку», «может не весь будем вводить?» 😄
И да! Я это полностью поддерживаю! 👍🏻
Ведь наша работа, как специалистов эстетической медицины, заключается в гармонизации, усовершенствовании природных данных, придания большей уверенности и привнесения положительных эмоций пациенту, без искажения собственной анатомии!
И такие запросы на введение меньшего количества препарата у меня…
В Новый год с новым видео!
•Антивозрастная коррекция губ•
Придали четкость контуру;
Проработали вермилион;
Разгладили крупные морщинки, сохранив естественный микрорельеф на поверхности;
Вернули ткани «в 18 лет»✔️
ЧЕСТНОСТЬ ИЛИ ДЕНЬГИ?💰
Сегодня на очную консультацию пришла девушка 26 лет, невообразимой красоты по-моему мнению.
Высокая, чистая кожа, русые волосы, аккуратные черты лица, вылитая Хейли Бибер, только наша пациентка имеет природную русскую красоту, какую редко встретишь сегодня, особенно в мегаполисе, который перенасыщен гипертрофированной модой.
Конечно первый вопрос был про губы,проконсультировались, пришли к вы…
Как же прекрасно, что сейчас у всех каникулы ! Люди вокруг продолжают гулять, даже в такой мороз 🥶.
У меня прекрасное настроение ( надеюсь у Вас тоже ❤️), в планах мастерски не делать ничего глобального, высыпаться , общаться и еще не скоро возвращаться к рабочему настроению.
Хотя первая половина Января почти вся расписана и месяц обещает быть жарким 🔥 Но об этом потом. Дзен 🧘♀️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dralexandrakh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2023 to 1 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DR.ALEXANDRA.KH” (@dralexandrakh), 877 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dralexandrakh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.