Channel
@drakekmsk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001567936155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drakekmsk |
| Created | 1 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drakekmsk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 4 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
68 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 18 | 26.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 14.7% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 14.7% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 10.3% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2023 to 12 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ого тут осталось ещё довольно много людей, и это замечательно!!! для тех, кого нет в сайде - буквально вчера мне подарили тг премиум, из-за чего я будто обязан вернутся в мьюкм но канал будет новым!! @kevvvcs предлагайте мне снова мью под анкетой там, каждому буду рад💋
⚡3❤🔥2❤1🍓1💔1💘1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ #шефчик #мазейкипапы
переезд/// •.˳⁺˚sᴀꜰᴇ ᴢᴏɴᴇ ɪɴ ʀᴇᴀʟ ʟɪꜰᴇ˚⁺˳ pinned a photo
бля у меня тг ебнулся, он не даёт удалить описание и аву канала🤯🤯
🤯2⚡1❤1❤🔥1🥰1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
(нᥱ ᥴ᧐ʙᥴᥱⲙ)ᥰρ᧐щᥲ᧘ьныᥔ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ ᧐ᴛ 𐌺ᥱʙᥙнᥲ. чᴛ᧐ж. нᥲʙᥱρн᧐ᥱ, нᥲчнёⲙ ᥴ ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐, чᴛ᧐ я БЕЗУ𐌑𐋏𐌏 ᥰᥱρᥱд ʙᥲⲙᥙ ʙᥴᥱⲙᥙ ᥙᤋʙᥙняюᥴь, я ʙᥙн᧐ʙᥲᴛ ʙ ᴛ᧐ⲙ, чᴛ᧐ у᥊᧐жу ᥙ ρᥲᥴᥴᴛρᥲᥙʙᥲю ʙᥲᥴ. н᧐ нᥲ ᴛ᧐ ᥱᥴᴛь ᥰρᥙчᥙны. • ᥲκᴛᥙʙ нᥲ κᥲнᥲ᧘ᥱ. ᧐н ⲙᥱня ᥴ᧐ʙᥴᥱⲙ нᥱ уᥴᴛρᥲᥙʙᥲᥱᴛ. я ᥰρᥲκᴛᥙчᥱᥴκᥙ нᥱ ʙᥙжу ᥲκᴛᥙʙᥲ нᥲ κ᧐нᴛᥱнᴛᥱ ʙ ʙᥙдᥱ ρᥱᥲκцᥙᥔ ᥙ ρᴛ, ϶ᴛ᧐ ⲙᥱня ᧐чᥱнь ρᥲᥴᥴᴛρᥲᥙʙᥲᥱᴛ. • ᧐ᴛᥰᥙᥴκᥙ. ʙ ᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱднᥱᥱ ʙρᥱⲙя ᧐ᴛᥰᥙᥴ᧐κ ρᥲᤋᥲ ʙ 3 δ᧐᧘ьɯᥱ, чᥱⲙ ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴ᧐κ, ᥲ ᥰ᧐ᥙᥴκᥙ ⲙью ᤋᥲнᥙⲙᥲюᴛ ᥴ᧘ᥙɯκ᧐ⲙ ⲙ…
😢5💘3⚡1❤1❤🔥1💔1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
это пиздец.
⚡1❤1👍1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
@drakekmsk
⚡1❤1👍1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
что вы думаете насчёт моего ухода из мьюкм?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡1👍1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
если я ливну из мьюкм, то план такой: канал наподобии аккоми исключительно с контентом, куда будет входить ещё моё фикрайтерство (а может и для ФБ отдельный) + сайд с онли щп я не уверен, что ливну, но это вполне вероятно
⚡1💘1😢1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
Sticker, posted without a caption
⚡1👍1💘1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
реально что-ли ливнуть из мьюкм, не знаю
💔3⚡1💘1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
блять я это ваше отписки в рот ебал)
⚡1🍓1👍1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
мы просто обсуждали что будет если я буду ходить в очках (в последнее время зрение пиздец, завтра к окулисту) и почему то решили что я буду пиздец какой секс мужик
⚡1🍓1👍1
Signed ᴋᴇᴠɪɴ ᴋᴀᴍsᴋɪ🫀ᶠᶦʳᵉ ᵇˡᵒᵒᵐ #шефчик
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @drakekmsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
что вы думаете насчёт моего ухода из мьюкм?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2023 to 12 June 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 837,731 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@drakekmsk named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“переезд/// •.˳⁺˚sᴀꜰᴇ ᴢᴏɴᴇ ɪɴ ʀᴇᴀʟ ʟɪꜰᴇ˚⁺˳” (@drakekmsk), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drakekmsk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.