Channel
@dragossden
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,594subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002293028628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dragossden |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dragossden |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 3,594 | +18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 3,576 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 3,584 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 3,584 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
149 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 45.6% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 26.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 9.40% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 4.70% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.70% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.03% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 2.01% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.34% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.671% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.671% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
havent been too active writing here, been trading lately, with smaller size, results are pretty good; started dabbling with stocks as well I'm really not sure how much juice there still is but just adapting and playing with small size so I can capitalize whenever the next big opportunity presents itself (around mid-terms or whenever)
👍5❤1🤡1
Signed dragos
https://x.com/itsalasdairmann/status/2066541741432340783
🤡1
Signed dragos
can't believe they banned Fable for everyone, that stuff was insane; only used it for what, 3 days, now I'm back on Opus and I feel like it sucks bigtime
👍9🌭3
Signed dragos
Tp’d, unsure of direction, think we can still go higher
👍1
Signed dragos
shorted some ETH on the spike a few hours ago, for now think rallies are a fade, could be proven wrong though
❤8
Signed dragos
btc swept feb lows so far
❤2
Signed dragos
there are not many things to bid that are actually interesting in crypto rn, however one of the areas that I am paying a lot of attention to is crypto x ai I wrote last week that I like a few projects there - I think generally the entire Solana ecosystem tooling + Fomo have made it very transparent as to what ppl are buying there is less friction than ever in being able to buy a token and there is in most cases ins…
❤11
Signed dragos
I've reduced my size on perps a lot, maybe I will start posting here as I feel more comfortable posting again; reducing size helped since I can ride out my ideas, have clear invalidations, not lose much when it goes against me had a very small short on ETH that I closed yesterday on the sweep of the lows also shorted VVV (very small) above 20 bc it's done a pretty clean 3 drives up pattern longed eth just now since …
👍5❤3👾1
Signed dragos
would you buy this chart?
👎7👍1🔥1😁1
Signed dragos
but I still think we eventually go lower than this
❤3
Signed dragos
btc finally tagged 200w sma which it didn't in feb
🔥1
Signed dragos
personally think we bounce from here for now
❤2🔥1
Signed dragos
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dragossden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 298,439 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dragos' Den” (@dragossden), 3,594 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dragossden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.