هویت جنسی در کودکان 💡دوره تکمیلی فرزند پروری 🌱 دکتر فرزانه فردین فر
❤1💔1

Channel
@dr_zanann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,072subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001065607849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_zanann |
| Description | 🌱 فرزانه فردین فر مشاور کانال دوست من سلام مشاوره رایگان 👇 🍃 @Moshaver_zanashoii_bot مشاوره خصوصی تلفنی و آنلاین با هزینه 👇 🍃 @Mkhososi دوره های آموزشی 👇 🍃 @dr_fardinfar تعرفه تبلیغات 👇 🍃 @taarefe_tablighat اپلیکیشن رسمی ما👇 💛 @Sycho_ir |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_zanann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 15,072 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 15,076 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 15,082 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 15,092 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 15,098 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 15,097 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 15,102 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 15,104 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 15,114 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 15,113 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 15,113 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 5,790 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
177 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 48.6% | |
| 👍 | 73 | 41.2% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 4.52% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.82% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.26% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.565% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هویت جنسی در کودکان 💡دوره تکمیلی فرزند پروری 🌱 دکتر فرزانه فردین فر
❤1💔1
زبانهای عشق در کودکان #فرزانه_فردین_فر 🎧 #فرزندپروری ♥🔛 @MarkazMoshaveree
❤7👍2
همه والدین آرزو دارن فرزندشون موفق باشه... اما موفقیتی که با اضطراب، ترس یا احساس ناکافی بودن همراه باشه، موفقیت واقعی نیست. 🌱 هنر واقعی والدگری اینه که فرزندی تربیت کنیم که هم در زندگی بدرخشه، هم از زندگی لذت ببره. در دوره طلایی فرزندپروری یاد میگیری چطور بدون دعوا، تهدید و تنبیه، فرزندی با اعتمادبهنفس، آرام و موفق تربیت کنی. بهترین هدیهای که میتونی به فرزندت بدی، یاد گرفتن مهارتهای درست فرزندپروریه. 💚 دریا…
😁5❤1
۴ سبک والدینی که بچه رو لجبازتر میکنن: 1. دستور دادن پشت سر هم (بشین، پاشو، نکن، برو...) 2. داد زدن و تهدید کردن (اگه این کارو بکنی...!) 3. نه گفتن به هر خواستهای بدون توضیح (فقط چون من گفتم!) 4. کنترل بیش از حد و ندادن حق انتخاب (برای همه چیز خودت تصمیم میگیری.)
👍11
چرا نباید به نوجوان بگوییم «بزرگ میشوی یادت میرود»؟ این جمله، پرکاربردترین «سمِ کلامی» در برخورد با نوجوانان است. از نظر علوم اعصاب، مغز نوجوان جهان را با شدتِ احساسیِ بسیار بالایی تجربه میکند (Intensity). وقتی ما میگوییم «یادت میرود»، در واقع داریم «اعتبارِ هیجانی» او را با خاک یکسان میکنیم. راهکار عملی برای والدین/مربیان: به جای کماهمیت جلوه دادنِ مشکلش، از «تکنیکِ آینهای» استفاده کنید: «میبینم که چقدر با…
❤8👍5
چطور مغزت رو گول بزنی تا از تنبلی دست بردارد؟ 🚀⏳ همیشه اون کاری که باید انجام بدی (مثل درس خوندن، ورزش یا بیدار شدن) رو عقب میاندازی؟ مشکل از تو نیست، مشکل از مغزته! مغز ما برای محافظت از ما، دوست داره همیشه در «امنیت و تنبلی» بمونه. اما یه ترفند خفن به اسم «قانون ۵ ثانیه» وجود داره که میتونه این چرخه رو بشکنه: ✅ هر وقت حس کردی باید کاری رو شروع کنی ولی مغزت داره excuses (بهونه) میاره، بلافاصله معکوس بشمار: ۵ - …
👍15❤5
🧠 تو «بیشازحد» فکر نمیکنی، فقط داری بازیخوانی میکنی! خیلیها بهت میگویند «ول کن، اینقدر سخت نگیر» یا «داری زیادی فکر میکنی». اما واقعیت این است که مغز تو فقط دارد سعی میکند احتمالات را پیشبینی کند تا غافلگیر نشوی. مشکل اینجاست که ما داریم «فکر کردن» را با «پیشبینی فاجعه» اشتباه میگیریم. نکته: دفعه بعد که ذهنت رفت سمتِ «اگر اینطور شود چی؟»، بهجای اینکه جلوی فکرت را بگیری، از خودت بپرس: «خب، اگر آن اتفا…
❤8
چطوری واکنش نشون بدیم؟ ✅ به جای تنبیه، همدلی کن: به جای اینکه بگی “خفه شو، اینجا داری همه رو معذب میکنی”، بگو: “میبینم که خیلی خستهای و این کار برات سخته. بیا یه کم اینجا بشینیم تا آروم بشی.” ✅ نامگذاری کن: بهشون یاد بده که احساسشون رو بشناسن. “داری عصبانی میشی؟” یا “داری ناراحت میشی؟”. وقتی بچه یاد بگیره اسمِ احساسش رو بگه، اون موجِ بزرگ، کمکم آروم میشه. یادت باشه: تو قرار نیست اونها رو “کنترل” کنی، تو…
👌8❤3👍1
چرا بچهها وقتی کلافهاند، کارهای عجیب و سخت انجام میدهند؟ «تا حالا شده وسطِ یه خریدِ ساده یا یه مهمونی، یهو فرزندت یه جوری رفتار کنه که انگار میخواد کلِ دنیا رو بههم بریزه؟ جیغ، داد، یا حتی زمینخواب شدن و لگد زدن؟ 😫 اولین چیزی که به ذهنِ ما میرسه اینه: “چقدر ای بچه بیادبه!” یا “چرا اینقدر اذیت میکنه؟” اما بیاید از یه زاویه دیگه نگاه کنیم. کودکان (مخصوصاً زیر ۷ سال) مثل یک ظرفِ کوچک از احساسات هستند. وقتی…
❤7
⚠️«چرا “همیشه مثبت بودن” یه سمِ محضه؟» «بچهها، این جمله که “فقط به چیزهای خوب فکر کن” رو بندازید دور. وقتی با یه اتفاق بد روبهرو میشی، اگه بخوای به زور مثبت فکر کنی، داری یه لایه رنگِ خوشگل میزنی روی یه دیوارِ شکسته. احساساتِ منفیِ ما (مثل خشم یا غم) مثل چراغِ چکِ ماشینن؛ دارن بهمون میگن یه جایی از زندگیمون میلنگه. به جای اینکه چراغِ چک رو با چسبباطله بپوشونی، برو ببین مشکل موتور کجاست!»
👍15
هیچ وقت کودکت رو مجبور نکن به خاطر صرفا احساس خوب فرد دیگه ای احساساتش رو نادیده بگیره. قرار هست ما هم به خودمون اهمیت بدیم و هم به شکل درست به دیگران. ❌️اگه وسایلت رو بهش ندی مامان، ناراحت میشن دیگه خونمون نمیان. ✔️کسی که مهمونی میاد خونمون همراه خودش وسیله نداره، اگه وسیله ای خیلی برات مهمه میتونیم اونو جمع کنیم و بقیه رو به اشتراک بذاریم
❤15👍1
مغزت با “فکر کردن” آروم نمیشه، بیشتر وقتها با اقدام کوچیک آروم میشه.
❤5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dr_zanann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 698,403 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دوست من سلام(والدین آگاه)” (@dr_zanann), 15,072 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_zanann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.