Врач-гинеколог, кмн, докмед
Стаж более 15 лет
от интимных вопросов до сложных диагнозов
Консультация👇
Онлайн - вотс ап/телеграм, ассистентка
+7 927 134-43-44
Очный приём - клиника Источник
458-04-10
Подробнее
https://taplink.cc/dr_suslova
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,379–7,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 04:33
7,428
+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:54
7,427
+3
21 Aug 2026, 16:25
7,424
+7
14 Aug 2026, 23:26
7,417
+13
11 Aug 2026, 19:11
7,404
+16
8 Aug 2026, 16:54
7,388
+3
7 Aug 2026, 21:00
7,385
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:57
7,385
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 7,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
924
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
33 (16 July 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
16,635
Reactions total
279
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
182
Videos
68
Links
301
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 13s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
478 reactions across 31 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
333
69.7%
👍
95
19.9%
😁
23
4.81%
❤🔥
5
1.05%
🫡
5
1.05%
😱
4
0.837%
🙈
3
0.628%
💯
2
0.418%
🐳
1
0.209%
👀
1
0.209%
💊
1
0.209%
🔥
1
0.209%
🗿
1
0.209%
😭
1
0.209%
🙏
1
0.209%
🤯
1
0.209%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 478reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨Травма ускоряет старение памяти на 17%. И это не зависит от детства
Новое исследование показало: травмирующие события во взрослом возрасте ускоряют ухудшение памяти у пожилых людей на 17%. И неважно, было ли тяжёлое детство.
Учёные наблюдали за почти 3000 человек старше 50 лет в течение 10 лет. Те, кто пережил серьёзную травму — потерю ребёнка, стихийное бедствие, нападение, тяжёлую болезнь супруга — теряли память…
Если вас обесценивают, значит вы действительно представляете ценность!
Люди обесценивают именно то, что для них слишком значимо и так они пытаются справиться с завистью и ощущением собственной уязвимости.
Согласны?
Если вы не знаете, как поступить в ситуации, когда порвался презерватив, то напомню, что я для вас записала видео.
Вы получаете пошаговый алгоритм, что, когда и как нужно делать
📱Смотреть видео по ссылк👇
https://youtu.be/Mo02hMRKcAw?is=Zxql79zit-ZeQud8
Сохраните, чтобы иметь под рукой в самый неподходящий момент!
⚠️ Франция отозвала 300 тысяч презервативов. Проверьте, не купили ли вы их
Французские антимошеннические и медицинские ведомства бьют тревогу. Десятки тысяч потенциально опасных презервативов продавались в интернете, магазинах и аптеках.
Что случилось
— 260 000 презервативов отозваны из аптек и магазинов
— Лабораторные анализы показали риск разрыва или перфорации
— Ещё 30 наименований на онлайн-площадках продавалис…
Сколько партнёров — норма? Честно о стыдных вопросах
Почему нас волнует число половых партнёров, особенно у других? Что говорит мировая статистика? И где заканчиваются факты и начинаются мифы?
💬В этом видео разбираю:
— сколько партнёров считается «нормой» в разных странах;
— растягивается ли влагалище от частой смены партнёров;
— почему теория телегонии — лженаука;
— риски заражения ВПЧ и связь с количеством партнё…
Спойлер: всё, что вы знаете о «девственности», скорее всего, неправда.
Этот миф портит жизнь. Женщины стесняются, боятся, переживают. Мужчины требуют, сомневаются, проверяют. А ведь всё это построено на лжи.
🎥Я записала видео, где просто и честно объясняю, что на самом деле происходит с телом. Без страшилок. Без осуждения. Только анатомия и факты.
Я правда советую посмотреть каждому — и женщинам, и мужчинам. Потом…
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Может ли гинеколог определить жила ли девушка половой жизнью?
Да, конечно40%
Нет, исключено23%
Все зависит от компетенции доктора18%
Не знаю21%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Людям с гипергидрозом или ночной потливостью сон без пижамы может способствовать более быстрому испарению пота, но также может привести к увеличению влажности постельного белья. Поэтому часто предпочтительным вариантом является легкая, дышащая одежда для сна, которую нужно регулярно менять.
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @dr_suslova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Может ли гинеколог определить жила ли девушка половой жизнью?
Да, конечно40%
Нет, исключено23%
Все зависит от компетенции доктора18%
Не знаю21%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как думаете , может ли мужчина определить симулируете вы или нет?
Думаю, нет29%
Возможно25%
Может догадываться37%
Конечно да16%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор Елена Суслова- о женском здоровье 👩🏼⚕️” (@dr_suslova), 7,428 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_suslova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
