2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 697–699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 20:37
698
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:17
698
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 698 subscribers
Avg views / post
234
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
12 (21 April 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
234
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
68.3%
🔥
19
18.3%
🕊
5
4.81%
⚡
2
1.92%
👍
2
1.92%
💔
2
1.92%
💯
2
1.92%
🥰
1
0.962%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В практике ветеринарной кардиологии существует коварный сценарий 😈
Пациент проходит полное обследование (ЭхоКГ и ЭКГ) - и получает «чистый» диагноз. Никаких патологий. Однако спустя всего 1–4 недели эта же кошка поступает в клинику в критическом состоянии: тяжелая одышка в покое, нарастающая дыхательная недостаточность. При повторной диагностике картина меняется кардинально: мы видим выраженное утолщение миокарда, с…
Дорогое ветсообщество!
Скоро день рождения Юли Суховий. Уже полгода её нет с нами.
19 июля, я хочу собрать всех, кто её знал и любил. Не для того, чтобы грустить, а чтобы вспомнить хорошее. Мы послушаем Юлин плейлист, посмотрим фотографии и видео, расскажем истории, пообнимаемся и просто побудем вместе.
И ещё в этот день будет своп её вещей.
Их очень много. Мне очень хочется, чтобы они не лежали в коробках, а про…
Да что сложного в ветеринарии? Работаешь с животными, получаешь зарплату…»
Со стороны может показаться, что работа ветеринарного врача - это только общение с милыми питомцами.
Ветеринария - это не просто профессия. Это ежедневный выбор быть рядом в самые сложные моменты и делать всё возможное, чтобы помочь каждому пациенту.
Спасибо каждому владельцу за доверие, терпение и заботу о своих питомцах. Вместе мы делаем …
15 и 16 июня прошел двухдневный мастер-класс по регионарной анестезии под контролем ультразвука в Москве — на образовательной площадке Balf
Ключевая тема, которую мы разбирали на протяжении всего курса, — почему ультразвуковая навигация принципиально меняет качество регионарной анестезии.
В отличие от «слепых» техник, где основное анатомические ориентиры и опыт врача - ультразвук даёт нам главное: контроль.
Это осо…
Продолжается серия бесплатных вебинаров по ветеринарной анестезиологии от компании Mindray Animal Medical📚
И вот уже совсем скоро состоится 4 лекция.
🗓 29 мая, пятница
🕑 17:00–19:00 (МСК)
Все участники вебинара получат электронный сертификат в течение месяца 📩
🔗 Ссылка на регистрацию: https://forms.gle/Mk8XTFfA1WLXePhM9
Коллеги, приветствую!
🥀Лето — это не только время прогулок, но и время много работать, учиться и обмениваться опытом.
Возвращаюсь к вам с темой применения у кошек и собак нестероидных противовоспалительных средств — НПВС.
НПВС — одна из самых часто назначаемых групп анальгетиков в ветеринарии, но их применение требует осознанного выбора пациента, дозы и мониторинга.
Благодарю всех, кто принял участие в опросе: та…
Фотоотчет с XXI Всероссийская конференция по вопросам анестезиологии, реанимации и интенсивной терапии – ВИТАР с международным участием представителей AVA - одно из лучших профессиональных событий, в котором я участвовала! Организация была просто безупречной. Начиная с логистики и заканчивая таймингом. Программа впечатлила разнообразием и глубиной: все темы были посвящены лечению боли. Участие представителей AVA доб…
Какие нежелательные реакции при применении НПВП у 🐕 вы встречали:
Почечная недостаточность26%
Рвота и диарея89%
Язва желудка/кишечника48%
Перфорация желудка/кишечника22%
Гепатотоксичность9%
Нарушение свертываемости5%
Другое (в комментариях)1%
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие нежелательные реакции при применении НПВП у 🐈 вы встречали:
Почечная недостаточность36%
Рвота и диарея82%
Язва желудка/кишечника46%
Перфорация желудка/кишечника24%
Гепатотоксичность9%
Нарушение свертываемости3%
Другое (в комментариях)1%
The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На основе какого действующего вещества для лечения боли у 🐕НПВС вы используете:
Мелоксикам80%
Робенококсиб51%
Карпрофен4%
Кетопрофен6%
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На основе какого действующего вещества для лечения боли у 🐈 НПВС вы используете:
Мелоксикам90%
Робенококсиб32%
Карпрофен2%
Кетопрофен4%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dr_sleepvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие нежелательные реакции при применении НПВП у 🐕 вы встречали:
Почечная недостаточность26%
Рвота и диарея89%
Язва желудка/кишечника48%
Перфорация желудка/кишечника22%
Гепатотоксичность9%
Нарушение свертываемости5%
Другое (в комментариях)1%
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие нежелательные реакции при применении НПВП у 🐈 вы встречали:
Почечная недостаточность36%
Рвота и диарея82%
Язва желудка/кишечника46%
Перфорация желудка/кишечника24%
Гепатотоксичность9%
Нарушение свертываемости3%
Другое (в комментариях)1%
The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На основе какого действующего вещества для лечения боли у 🐕НПВС вы используете:
Мелоксикам80%
Робенококсиб51%
Карпрофен4%
Кетопрофен6%
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На основе какого действующего вещества для лечения боли у 🐈 НПВС вы используете:
Мелоксикам90%
Робенококсиб32%
Карпрофен2%
Кетопрофен4%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 870,474 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr.Eltsova_vet” (@dr_sleepvet), 698 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_sleepvet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
