Channel
@dr_inkins
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001998394376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_inkins |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_inkins |
Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 62 | +4 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 58 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 57 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 53 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 53 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 79.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Бонжорно! Пока все туристы в Риме стоят в очереди в церкви Сант-Иньяцио, чтобы сфотографировать “тот самый” распиаренный потолок над своей головой и запилить еще один миллионный рилс, в двадцати минутах ходьбы в Палаццо Барберини есть ещё более шикарный потолок и тот же трюк с обманом перспективы. Только масштабнее и без единого человека в зале. Хоть обфотографируйся. Зацените какая невероятная красота! В Риме я бы…
🔥3
Июль у меня прям концертный марафон артистов пенсионной лиги. Сходил на Anthrax, Iron Maiden, Scorpions, Sting.
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3
Бонжорно! Продолжаем исследовать подземелья Неаполя. На эту церковь я наткнулся совершенно случайно. Она небольшая, незаметная, крипта вообще 3 на 3. Но оказалось, что там скрыта просто хоррор история про некро-традиции неаполитанцев. И череп с ушами это как раз там же. Жаль фото не передают этого подземного запаха. Все подробности по ссылке.
🔥4
Бонжорно! Облазил за три дня все неаполитанские подвалы и катакомбы, но неожиданно наткнулся на одно интересное место прямо в центре города. И это реальный исторический детектив, спрятанный в старом храме. Итак.... Я нашел в Неаполе ту самую могилу, в которой возможно захоронен Дракула. До сих пор она официально считается захоронением неаполитанского дворянина Маттео Феррилло. Вот только Феррилло никогда не имел о…
❤3
В эфире рубрика "Пробуем всякое". Сегодня на дегустации португальский хит - ликер из дерьма (licor de merda). Уточню - это молочный (leite) ликер из дерьма, а то мало ли у кого-то непереносимость лактозы. К остальным ингредиентам вопросов конечно нет 👌🏼 В 1974 году в португальском городе Cantanhede Луиш Нуну Сержиу занимался производством домашних ликеров. А ещё у него была большая 20-литровая бутыль, куда он слива…
🔥4
Это Ipogeo dei Cristallini, Неаполь. Одно из самых необычных мест, где я был. Представьте: 1889 год, Неаполь, квартал Санита. Барон Джованни Донато решает вырыть во дворе своего палаццо колодец. Но на глубине 11 метров его ждала не вода, а четыре огромные, нетронутые, роскошно украшенные греческие гробницы времен Александра Македонского. Шокирован был не только барон, но и все соседи. Эту находку жители квартала де…
🔥5👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @dr_inkins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Делюсь, пока не забыл” (@dr_inkins), 62 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_inkins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.