Channel
@dr_chaibakhsh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,895subscribers
+85 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001823378309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_chaibakhsh |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_chaibakhsh |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 2,895 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 2,889 | +46 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 2,843 | +33 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 2,810 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 2,809 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:46 | 2,810 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
172 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 145 | 84.3% | |
| 😍 | 15 | 8.72% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 4.65% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
6⃣سوال ششم: کدام عبارت صحیح است؟ الف) متاآنالیز به طور متوسط نسبت به سایر مطالعات سایتیشن بیشتری دریافت میکند. ب) انجام متاآنالیز ساده است و به همین جهت محققین علاقمند به انجام آن هستند. ج) هر دو مورد برای پاسخ به این سوال جواب مدنظر رو تو استوریها ریپلای کنین و آخرین سوال رو هم جواب بدین تا در قرعهکشی بتونین شرکت کنین👇🏻 https://www.instagram.com/stories/dr.chaibakhsh/3967946956180311930?utm_source=ig_story_i…
❤7
بریم سراغ سوال ششم و آخر🌻 از جلسه ششم👇🏻
❤6
🟣درس ششم، قسمت آخر📲 آیا انجام متاآنالیز واقعا ارزش داره یا نه؟ همونطور که احتمالا میدونین انجام متاآنالیز کار سادهای نیست!❌ درسته که نیاز به جمعآوری دیتا نداره اما پروتکل سرچ و استخراج داده ها کار سادهای نیست پس ما مسیر راحتی پیش رو نداریم!❌ چرا باید متاآنالیز انجام بدیم؟ از نظر قدرت شواهد متاآنالیز ها در راس هرم قرار میگیرن چرا متاآنالیزها میزان citation بیشتری دارن؟ افردا ترجیح میدن به جای اینکه برن سرچ …
❤6🙏1
به جلسهی ششم و جلسهی آخر کلاس متاآنالیز خوش اومدین 🫱🏻🫲🏻 مسیر کلاس رایگانمون🛣 داره تموم میشه و فردا هم آخرین سوال آخرین جلسه رو میذاریم و بعدش هم قرعهکشی🎁 انجام میشه اگر به پنج سوال از تمام سوالات مطرح شده پاسخ درست داده باشین در قرعهکشی شرکت داده میشین و برنده یک دوره جامع آموزش متاآنالیز به ارزش ۳ میلیون تومان هدیه 🎁 میگیره.
😍3❤2
5⃣سوال پنجم: در یک متاآنالیز، Effect Size چه چیزی را نشان میدهد؟ الف) تعداد مطالعات واردشده به متاآنالیز ب) اندازه و جهت اثر مورد بررسی در هر مطالعه ج) تعداد افراد شرکتکننده در مطالعات برای پاسخ به این سوال جواب مدنظر رو تو استوریها انتخاب یا ریپلای کنین👇🏻 https://www.instagram.com/stories/dr.chaibakhsh/3965166592919743367?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=OTUzbWNlanBheXJ1
❤6
بریم سراغ سوال پنجم از جلسه پنجم👇🏻
❤5
🟣درس پنجم، قسمت۱📲 تفسیر نتایج فراتحلیل با بررسی یک مثال کاربردی
❤7
به جلسه پنجم کلاس رایگان متاآنالیز خوش اومدین.🌻
❤6
4⃣سوال چهارم از پنج سوال: معیارهای ورود و خروج در متا آنالیز نسبت به سیستماتیک ریویو: الف) یکسان است. ب) سختگیرانهتر است. ج) سادهتر است. برای پاسخ به این سوال جواب مدنظر رو تو استوریها انتخاب یا ریپلای کنین👇🏻 https://www.instagram.com/stories/dr.chaibakhsh/3960741269495935571?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=MWZnZ2psemdwOTB2bA==
❤5✍2
بریم سراغ سوال چهارم از جلسه چهارم👇🏻
😍7
تفاوت متاآنالیز و سیستماتیک ریویو.
❤10👍2
🟣درس چهارم، قسمت۱📲 گاهی سوال ما فقط این نیست که آیا ارتباط وجود داره اثربخشی وجود داره یا همبستگی وجود داره یا نه! سوال ما فراتر از این حرفهاست و ما دنبال این هستیم که اگر ارتباطی وجود داره این ارتباط چقدره میزان اثربخشی چقدره اگر اختلافی وجود داره این اختلاف چقدره اینجاست که تفاوت سیستماتیک ریویو و متاآنالیز خودش رو نشون میده
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dr_chaibakhsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr.chaibakhsh” (@dr_chaibakhsh), 2,895 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_chaibakhsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.