مناقشة أدلة الإثبات وأدلة النفي من اختصاص محكمة الموضوع وليس من اختصاص قاضي التحقيق. محكمة التمييز الاتحادية- ٢٠٢٤

Channel
د. حسين المولى
@dr_almawla
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,760subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001824543070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_almawla |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_almawla |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 1,760 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 1,761 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
أركان الجريمة
Photo, posted without a caption
مواد الامتحان التقويمي لكليات القانون للعام الدراسي 2025-2026 بعد اجتماع لجنة العمداء المرحلة الثانية: القانون الإداري- القانون المدني المرحلة الثالثة: تحدد المادة الوزارية قبل مدة من موعد الامتحان. الرابعة: المنظمات الدولية- الحقوق العينية.
التعويض عن الضرر الأدبي المستشار عزمي البكري
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
قانون اصول المحاكمات الجزائية رقم 23 لسنة 1971 المادة 291: لاقارب المحكووم عليه ان يزوروه في اليوم السابق على يوم المعين لتنفيذ عقووبة الاعدام وعلى إدارة السجن اخبارهم بذلك.
من هنا يتوجب أن نعي أن النصوص سواء كانت دستورية أو قانونية فهي صنعت بحرفة صانع قانوني، ومع هذا فهي تصاب بالمرض, كما وانها تشيخ مع تقدم العمر والتطبيق، فلا نلوم النص، بل علينا أن نسعى دائمًا لتصحيح مكامن الخلل، وتعديل المعوج، فمتى ما كان النص سيئا في التطبيق بات أداة سهلة لتكريس الظلم وانعدام الثقة بين النص القانوني ومن يطبق عليه، هذا الانعدام يؤثر على سير العمل في الدولة، ويشكك بأي حكم أو قرار يتخذ، فما على اساسه بُن…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dr_almawla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هل ما يُعرف بحق الدولة في العقاب هو حق فعلي أم مجرد سلطة؟
- حق بالعقاب45%
- سلطة بالعقاب57%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
هل أخذ المشرع الجنائي العراقي بالخطر الوهمي في الدفاع الشرعي؟
- نعم43%
- لا58%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2025 to 25 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lhfa_k · 63,665
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د. حسين المولى” (@dr_almawla), 1,760 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_almawla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.