Channel
@dr1moatazabod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,092subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001381018759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr1moatazabod |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr1moatazabod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 1,092 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 1,091 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 1,092 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 1,092 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 9 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 49.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 18.9% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 9.43% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2024 to 25 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تشخيص الاشعه ✅ الكسور باللون الاخضر Bilateral subcondylar fractures + Mandibular symphyseal fracture اللي باللون الاحمر sialolithiasis in the R submandibular gland اللي باللون الازرق Impacted canine
❤🔥4❤1
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
رابط التسجيل 👇 https://forms.gle/Z3N9LxGEugeXg8Y97 *علماً ان الحضور للندوه مجاني
👍1
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
💡إستخدامات ال MTA ▪️ Vital therapy : Direct Pulp Capping ▪️pulpotomy. ▪️ Non vital therapy : Apexification. ▪️ Perforation. ▪️ Super sealing properties.
❤2
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
Here are tips on when to use each type of local anesthesia! Save it for later 🦷
❤4
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
نعم ،يؤثر التدخين على معدل السكر التراكمي HbA1C بحيث الشخص المدخن تكون عنده زيادة وهمية في السكر التراكمي hba1c ولا يؤثر التدخين على السكر الصيامي، والتدخين يزيد من قدرة البروتين على الارتباط بالسكر فحص hba1c هو في الاصل يستخدم فقط لمتابعة العلاج عند مريض السكري اذا كان مريض السكري مدخن او من اصحاب التكسر او من عنده امراض مزمنة بالكبد او الكلى لا نعتمد على hba1c لانه تطلع النتائج خاطئة ونستخدم فحوصات اخرى للمتابعة نف…
❤5
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
هل هناك فرق في معدل HbA1c لمريض السكري المدخن وغير المدخن ؟🤔 و اذا كان مريض السكري مدخن او من اصحاب التكسر او عنده امراض مزمنة بالكبد او الكلى نعتمد على hba1c ؟🤔 وشنو السبب؟
🤔5
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
بوست اليوم يعتبر غاية الأهمية في التعامل مع مرضى السرطان ودور طبيب الأسنان في التعامل معهم اليوم راح أتكلم عن المرضى الذين يتعاطون علاج اشعاعي Radiotherapy
❤9🔥2
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
Dry socket تكون من قبل المريض عدم الألتزام بـ تعليمات الطبيب •عدم التدخين •عدم حركة اللسان مكان السن المقلوع •عدم المضمضة (تعليمات مابعد القلع) اما infection socket استخدام ادوات ملوثه من قبل الطبيب الأدوات تكون غير معقمة .
👍7❤3
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
♻️ما الفرق بين الـ Dry socket _ Infected socket?
❤🔥6
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
اي سن ..؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
شنو اكثر سن ممكن يسبب infra orbital space infection?? وليش؟ ؟
❤2
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
lower 6 Molar right side 👆
Signed ꧁〄MӨΛTΛZ BΣП ΛBӨD〄꧂
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dr1moatazabod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اي سن ..؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
يا سن ...؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2024 to 25 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 438,309 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr.MOATAZ ABOD” (@dr1moatazabod), 1,092 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr1moatazabod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.