Channel
@dpol_un_en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,592subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001678366994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dpol_un_en |
| Created | 19 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dpol_un_en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 1,592 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 1,593 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 1,596 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 1,597 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 1,599 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,600 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 1,600 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
438 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 305 | 69.6% | |
| 👏 | 114 | 26.0% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 2.74% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.685% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.685% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.228% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2024 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My interview to the RT today. We discussed recent Kiev regime's terrorist attacks and its tactics to distract public opinion from crumbling battlefield positions https://rumble.com/v7c1vvo-ukraine-nothing-more-today-but-private-military-company-dmitry-polyanskiy.html
👍15👏2😱1
Another in-depth conversation with Glenn Diesen on European Security, now from the OSCE perspective
👍19
My farewell appearance at the WBAI Radio in New York
😢12👏6👍4🤔1
Europe wants a ceasefire to give ‘breathing space’ to the Kiev regime ‘They want to make it heal its wounds and come back to… inflicting damage on Russia’ Russia learned from the Minsk agreements, Moscow’s permanent rep. to the OSCE, Dmitry Polyanskiy, tells RT
👍11
European leaders need an ‘enemy to disguise their own mistakes’ — Polyanskiy ‘You suffer because of Putin, Putin took your money away…if you have problems at home, say that Russians did it’ ‘I hope that …common fellow Europeans are not as crazy as their leaders’
👍12👏2
Another interview with Daniel Davis (Deep dive) on the prospects of peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis
👏12👍3
My new interview with Glenn Diesen on Ukraine, US efforts and prospects of European Security
👏14👍5👎2
Discussed with the RT today results of Russia’s presidency of the UN Security Council in October as well as some other pressing international issues
👍18
Discussed with Daniel Davis from the Deep Dive the current momentum in Russia - US relations and efforts to find a solution to the Ukrainian crisis
👍16👏1🤔1
Had another meaningful interview with Glenn Diesen on the eve of Trump - Putin telephone call where they agreed on a meeting in Budapest
👍28👏2
Russian UN Rep Polyanskiy says Ukraine isn’t serious about negotiations but 'playing games' instead Only US pressure even made the Istanbul talks happen Russia came to talk, Ukraine came to perform
👍10
‘We have the UPPER hand on the ground’ — UN Rep Dmitry Polyanskiy tells RT ‘EVEN biased Russia experts’ ADMIT Moscow’s offensive successfully developing ‘This… should be taken into consideration when somebody analyzes the pace of negotiations’
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dpol_un_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dmitry Polyanskiy” (@dpol_un_en), 1,592 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dpol_un_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.