4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,792–4,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:54
4,794
-6
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
4,800
-8
6 Aug 2026, 03:50
4,808
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:44
4,808
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
113
Videos
726
Links
55
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
14m 07s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,306 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,334
54.2%
👍
788
18.3%
👏
353
8.20%
💯
319
7.41%
🙏
240
5.57%
❤
139
3.23%
❤🔥
56
1.30%
🫡
19
0.441%
🤝
16
0.372%
🤯
11
0.255%
👻
7
0.163%
⚡
5
0.116%
😁
5
0.116%
😎
4
0.093%
🤣
4
0.093%
😍
2
0.046%
🤗
2
0.046%
🤔
1
0.023%
🤩
1
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 30 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dozorfire. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 September 2025 to 30 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Наши активисты из "D" приняли участие в погроме автомобиля ТЦК, совместно с местными жителями. Скоро, данное явление будет обыденным во всех городах нашей страны. Режиму не устоять перед народом и "D".
"D" - значит "Дозор"
Для связи @dozorukr
Вот он он!! "Краса и гордость" украинского народа, президент, которого мы "заслужили". Скольких сыновей, братьев, мужей и внуков убила эта мразь, эта западная марионетка, чтобы купить себе столько земли. И ни где-то там, а прямо в США. Мы обращаемся к нашим генералам и солдатам, направьте свои автоматы на Киев, примите участие в борьбе с режимом, положите всему этому конец. В его руках вы расходный материал, для дост…
Кто бы мог подумать, что актёр и профессиональный комик станет мясником. Реальность такова, это произошло и это факт.
Отдельные лица, говорят нам, что деятельность нашей организации невозможна.
Прочитайте строки выше... И невозможное возможно!
Мы призываем граждан включаться в борьбу с киевским режимом. Нашей организации интересна любая информация от отдельного сторонника режима, до мест хранения ракет "Фламинго". За…
В Одесской области карма настигла двух сотрудников могилизации. Их насмерть переехала фура на одном из блокпостов. От полученных травм они скончались на месте.
Водитель фуры был трезв и сообщил, что не видел данных лиц на дороге. И как бы это не казалось странным, но в это очень даже верится. После выхода этой новости, мы получили множество писем о поведении сотрудников ТЦК на блокпостах. Большая часть из них на пост…
🇺🇦ТЦК - трусы.
Как видно на кадрах из Днепропетровска, настойчивый отпор может спасти жителя остатков Украины от смерти на фронте.
Объединяйтесь. Сопротивляйтесь. Хотя бы ради себя.
Два майора
Дозор (D): О пользе пропаганды
Лучшее доказательство "эффективности" киевской пропаганды — это результат мощнейшей кампании против работы "Дозора", которую многие из вас наблюдали воочию. А результат на видео. Привет всем дозорным.
На видео: Винницкая область
Пишите на @dozorukr
Дозор (D): Бомжевоз на свалку
В Кировоградской области мы, кстати, поработали на славу. Вот вам еще в догонку жареный седан.
На видео: Кировоградская область
Пишите на @dozorukr
Дозор (D): Полыхнуло на отлично!
Наши дозорные порой увлекаются и заправляют шкафы таким количеством топлива, что мы сами вздрагиваем, когда смотрим отчеты. Попробуйте не моргнуть, когда будете смотреть этот видос. Привет всем от Дозора!
На видео: Кировоградская область
Пишите на @dozorukr
Дозор (D): Черный номер — приговор
Нам в бот постоянно пишут читатели, мол, не жалко ли нам жечь автомобили. И какой в этом смысл? Дозор отвечает: автомобили ни при чем. Весь смысл в снижении мобильности ВСУ. Учитывая насколько через жопу сейчас идут закупки и поставки любой техники в стране, а также тот милый факт, что из выделенных грошей половину воруют еще до закупки — отличный получается результат. Фактически, …
Дозор (D): Ночные прогулки Дозора
Мы очень по вам соскучились, дорогие подписчики. Если поддерживаете работу Дозора, дайте огня под этим видео.
На видео: Ивано-Франковск
Пишите на @dozorukr
🔥253❤🔥18🙏12👍7👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dozorfire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 792,129 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дозор (D) 🔥” (@dozorfire), 4,794 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dozorfire.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.