Channel
@dovod3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
3,998subscribers
+42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001377723646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dovod3 |
| Created | 19 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dovod3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 3,998 | +17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 3,981 | +23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 3,958 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 3,956 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 3,956 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,273 |
| Reactions total | 257 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
172 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 26.2% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 11.6% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 10.5% | |
| 🤬 | 18 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 6.98% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 5.81% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 5.23% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 5.23% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 3.49% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 2.91% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 2.33% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.33% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.74% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.581% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.581% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.581% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.581% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.581% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dovod3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Слуцкий требует запретить «Яблоко», пока партия набирает популярность в интернете Лидер ЛДПР Леонид Слуцкий призвал признать «Яблоко» «нежелательной организацией», назвав стремление партии к мирным переговорам «предательством». Ранее с публичными нападками на неё выступили лидеры других кремлёвских партий Сергей Миронов и депутат Алексей Журавлёв. Тем временем кампания «За мир и свободу» становится всё заметнее. У…
🤩6🤔3🤬2❤1👍1🤮1
«Яблоко» – самая популярная российская партия по просмотрам в Wikipedia Как обращает внимание «Дождь», «Яблоко» также стало самой популярной партией в Telegram по числу подписчиков. На нее подписаны уже более 100 тысяч человек. В поддержку «Яблока» запустили кампанию, в рамках которой можно писать посты и агитировать в соцсетях, координировать действия с другими участниками, снимать видео и предлагать свои идеи. «…
👍10😁2
За пять лет число избирателей во Владимирской области сократилось на 47 768 человек или на 4,32% На 1 июля 2021 года, перед выборами в Госдуму восьмого созыва, во Владимирской области насчитывался 1 104 841 избиратель. На 1 июля 2026 года их осталось 1 057 073 человека, обращает внимание «Чеснок». За 32 года, с 1990 по 2022, население Владимирской области сократилось на 20% или на 333 тысячи человек, почти вернувши…
Политический эмигрант из города Владимира Дмитрий Зуев получил повестку в военкомат с требованием явиться для постановки на воинский учёт. «Требуют встать на воинский учет, явившись в военкомат. И это учитывая, что у меня есть военник давным давно. Грозят штрафами за неявку! Если вы подобную залупу обнаружили в ящике, то знайте, что это не повестка. К тому же там нет конкретной даты и времени, следовательно статья,…
👍3🕊3🤡1😁1
Мэр заявил, что город Владимир уже готовят к отопительному сезону Во Владимире к зиме будут заменены трубы на тепловых сетях общей протяжённостью более 17 километров, заявил мэр Сергей Волков. «Уже провели гидравлические испытания на 80% коммуникаций. Всего к началу сезона заменим свыше 17 км трубопроводов по всему городу — от ул. Луначарского до проспекта Строителей и ул. 1-й Пионерской. Новые участки тепловики о…
🤔3
Объявят ли в России новую мобилизацию на войну?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤔2👍1
СМИ обсуждают, что российские власти могут объявить новую волну мобилизации в сентябре Источники «Медузы», «Верстки», «Важных историй» и других независимых медиа утверждают, что после выборов депутатов Госдумы в сентябре 2026 года Кремль готовится объявить новую волну мобилизации на войну с Украиной. По словам собеседников изданий, поводом для обсуждений мобилизации стали проблемы с набором контрактников и дефицит …
🤡2🤬2😱2❤1
Главный редактор «Довода» Илья Косыгин призвал голосовать за партию «Яблоко» «Я поддерживаю призыв Юлии Навальной и движения «Весна» голосовать за партию «Яблоко» на «выборах» в Госдуму РФ. Когда-то я сам состоял в «Яблоке». С этой партией связаны многие годы моей политической жизни: участие в выборах, работа помощником депутата, совместная деятельность со многими людьми, которых я по-прежнему уважаю. «Яблоко» — е…
❤18👍11👏4😁4
В России начали задерживать людей, которые фотографируют могилы участников войны для СМИ «Медиазона», BBC и команда волонтёров ведут поимённый список россиян, погибших на войне с Украиной – сейчас в нём уже более 236 тысяч человек, в том числе почти 2 тысячи жителей Владимирской области. «Довод» также ведёт собственный список, исследуя биографии погибших владимирцев. Власти скрывают информацию о погибших, поэтому С…
🤬14👍6
Школьники дарили фаллоимитатор учителю, которого обвиняют в педофилии В распоряжении издания «Чеснок» оказалось видео, на котором учащиеся школы №4 города Кольчугино Владимирской области дарят учителю искусственный фаллос. По данным издания, в школе все знали о «педофильских наклонностях педагога, но для многих это было скорее поводом для шуток, чем для серьезной тревоги». Как стало известно ранее, силовики задерж…
Во Владимире участились случаи «вопиющего неуважения к общественному пространству», заявили в мэрии По данным администрации, «вандалы наносят граффити и незаконные рисунки на стены жилых домов, исторических зданий и сооружений, а также целенаправленно портят городское имущество — разбивают остановки общественного транспорта, ломают скамейки и малые архитектурные формы». «Подобные действия — это не «современное иску…
🎉1
Более 600 миллионов рублей лишились жители Владимирской области под влиянием дистанционных мошенников с начала года Как заявили в УМВД, мошенники представляются сотрудниками госорганов, силовиками, операторами сотовой связи, менеджерами банков, и под различными предлогами обманывают жителей региона. В полиции зарегистрировано больше тысячи заявлений от потерпевших. Силовики не в состоянии эффективно бороться с таки…
🤷♂1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @dovod3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Объявят ли в России новую мобилизацию на войну?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 93,229 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| Official site | https://www.dovod.online/ |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Довод” (@dovod3), 3,998 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dovod3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.