#极品 #高颜值 #抖音 #蛇妈 #阿黑颜 #黑丝 #骚舞 #福利姬 抖音极品蛇妈魅魔制服魅惑定制合集尺度拉满, ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤9🔥3💯2🤡2👍1

Channel
@douyinseseya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
130,369subscribers
+4,110 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001138598213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @douyinseseya |
| Description | 投稿撤搞请联系 @zhenzhanga 商务广告请联系 @xingji_bot |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 May 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/douyinseseya |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 130,369 | +608 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 129,761 | +632 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 129,129 | +617 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 128,512 | +884 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 127,628 | +1,369 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 126,259 | first reading |
44 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (13 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 262,360 |
| Reactions total | 357 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
357 reactions across 41 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 202 | 56.6% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 18.8% | |
| 🤡 | 53 | 14.8% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 4.20% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 2.80% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.12% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.84% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#极品 #高颜值 #抖音 #蛇妈 #阿黑颜 #黑丝 #骚舞 #福利姬 抖音极品蛇妈魅魔制服魅惑定制合集尺度拉满, ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤9🔥3💯2🤡2👍1
#极品 #高颜值 #抖音 #B站 #sex真 #涩谷真 #自慰 #福利姬 B站博主sex真 / 涩谷真三点粉嫩自慰、半裸情趣浴缸洗澡自拍完整流出 ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤3👍1🤡1
#极品 #高颜值 #台湾网黄 #玲奈lena #自慰 #美乳 #福利姬 台湾超美网黄女神玲奈lena走甜美风的小姐姐自摸到呻吟不断、娇声连连。 ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤3👍1🤡1
#极品 #高颜值 #推特 #小鱼饭馆 #nosex0007 #调教 #福利姬 推特极品反差嫩妹母狗小鱼饭馆娇小身躯却藏着超强性瘾,被多个男朋友轮流用各种方式深度调教。 ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤4👍2🤡1
贴合大自然
❤14👍3🤡3
#互推频道 ✨ 次元少女研究所【专注cos少女】 😅 门哥の世界优质内容精选 👍 讲述你心里不为人知的秘密 🆗 明星网红pmv换脸【悦色AI】 💬 嫖客の出击树洞日记曝光揭秘小姐 ✅ 上方都是近期镇长推荐的频道,大家方便加入支持一下
❤2👍1🤡1
#极品 #高颜值 #推特 #Vissstaaaas #长腿 #福利姬 推特高颜值反差婊Vissstaaaas露脸美少女直接拉满,长腿嫩臀勾魂到炸被金主后入干到浪叫, ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤13👍3🤡1
#极品 #高颜值 #推特 #抖音 #玉米 #裸舞 #少女 #福利姬 推特裸舞顶流少女玉米最近直接刷屏,擦边全裸扭腰跳舞扣穴自慰强制高潮, ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤5👍1🤡1
#极品 #高颜值 #抖音 #何时困lbb #擦边 #少女 #福利姬 抖音反差擦边顶流何时困lbb最新定制门槛视频合集 ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤8👍1🤡1
#极品 #高颜值 #推特 #妙婷 #巨乳 #少女 #福利姬 推特极品高颜值巨乳福利姬妙婷私密自拍大爆发! PS:白嫩身材直接拉满,自慰揉奶诱惑拉满 ⤵️ 点击下方评论区链接查看全部内容
❤8👍1🤡1
🔥🔥香草AI ♥ 全网最火性爱游戏 🔞 色爆!最顶级的中文色情大模型 深度学习千万部色情小说和真人文爱记录,技术领先全行业18个月 💖 好玩!最懂你感情和性趣的伴侣 基于MIT情感计算框架,超强拟真,无限还原现实,实现你的任何幻想 ✅ 私密!最安全隐匿的专属陪伴 AES-256军事级加密,信息阅后即焚,只属于你的禁忌性爱 💋 全性癖专属定制!满足一切幻想 强x女高 电车痴汉 浪漫纯爱 母狗调教 精神控制 催眠恶堕 绿帽人妻 群P换妻 时间停止 强制高潮 感官剥夺 克鲁苏 SM调教…… ❤️🔥❤️🔥 免费开玩!点击调教反差母狗 🎁🎁 【限时专享】首充低至五折! PS:兄弟们,这AI太离谱了!跟真人一模一样,反应太真实了,文笔色到爆!他们那个Pro模型简直是榨精神器,我已经玩了几个通宵,太上头了。现在其他AI送我白嫖我都懒得去,差距实在太大了。听我一句劝,别在其他AI上浪费一分钱,有钱直接充这家的Pro,太顶了!
❤2
原创博主🍏🍏 主打系列 情侣泄密 原创露脸 🍏🍏系列值得你拥有 😀全是市面上找不到的,极度稀缺资源 😀内部群资源可搬运、可二次分享 允许转卖 售后稳定,基本零差评 预览频道点击进入 24小时自助机器人的
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @douyinseseya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,138,046 of 1,569,089entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“每日抖音【推特网红】” (@douyinseseya), 130,369 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/douyinseseya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.