29 measurements spanning 34 days, net +86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,150–10,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 03:40
10,249
+18
6 Sept 2026, 20:36
10,231
-2
4 Sept 2026, 10:41
10,233
+11
2 Sept 2026, 22:58
10,222
-4
1 Sept 2026, 19:33
10,226
+2
31 Aug 2026, 21:34
10,224
+5
30 Aug 2026, 20:44
10,219
+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:14
10,218
+1
28 Aug 2026, 17:43
10,217
+6
27 Aug 2026, 21:06
10,211
+2
26 Aug 2026, 18:02
10,209
+7
25 Aug 2026, 17:32
10,202
-2
24 Aug 2026, 18:58
10,204
-11
23 Aug 2026, 03:14
10,215
+4
21 Aug 2026, 17:24
10,211
-3
20 Aug 2026, 17:53
10,214
+9
19 Aug 2026, 14:52
10,205
+3
18 Aug 2026, 16:24
10,202
+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:24
10,201
+10
16 Aug 2026, 13:46
10,191
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 10,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,140
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
22 (26 July 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
25,620
Reactions total
1,114
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,825 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,546
54.7%
🔥
292
10.3%
😁
281
9.95%
👍
268
9.49%
😢
125
4.42%
🙏
88
3.12%
👏
70
2.48%
🎉
57
2.02%
🎄
32
1.13%
💯
31
1.10%
💔
16
0.566%
🕊
5
0.177%
🤩
5
0.177%
🥴
5
0.177%
😱
3
0.106%
👎
1
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,825 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 22 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doutora_mariia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
13.6%
3 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
2,110
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,410
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Самый частый дефицит XXI века
Продолжаем рубрику #чекап_novodoc
По итогам моих консультаций на этой неделе и за последний год, если составить топ запросов и выявляемых «дефицитов», то на первом месте окажутся вовсе не цинк и не селен.
Огромное количество взрослых (и немаленькое количество детей) живут с дефицитом железа.
Казалось бы, мы находимся в развитой европейской стране, где нет голода или такого уровня пара…
Общеевропейский обмен медицинскими данными (European Health Data Space)
как ответ на вопрос «примут ли мой рецепт из Португалии / Латвии / Франции – в другой стране Евросоюза».
Есть целый большой регламент и специальные еврокомиссии, которые за это отвечают. И пока что ответ звучит так: «Мы не знаем, может и примут, попробуйте в некоторых странах, но мы постараемся всё наладить к марту 2029»
(на словах ты Лев Толсто…
Не люблю –
вот эти психологические упражнения «Представь, что тебе осталось жить день / неделю / месяц – что бы ты тогда сделал(а)?»
Там, видимо, должен быть ответ про реализацию своих мечт, про наслаждение жизнью, про отсутствие запретов и страхов. Но эти ответы мало подходят для повседневности, где нужно думать про оплату страховки на год, техосмотр машины и следующие каникулы с ребёнком (хотя написать завещание и …
#реклама для моего любимого севера Португалии
🎭 Культурный вечер в Порту
Анна Ахматова и её творчество, читает Алиса Гребенщикова.
Когда хочется отвлечься от повседневных забот и просто погрузиться в глубокую, красивую литературу. Отличная новость для всех, кто скучает по качественным театральным вечерам!
В Порту пройдёт вечер Алисы Гребенщиковой с авторской поэтической программой, посвященной Анне Ахматовой.
Эт…
Почему конец лета и начало осени — лучшее время, чтобы сдать базовые анализы и проверить организм?
(это мое личное мнение, из практики с нашими пациентами, которых я веду не первый год. А также рекомендации международных сообществ терапевтов и эндокринологов – ссылки, как обычно, в комментариях).
1. Организм еще не успел подхватить осенние вирусы
Любая простуда искажает анализы крови. Например, показатели железа пр…
#реклама – бесплатные курсы португальского
Стадии изучения языка:
1) Отрицание: «Тут все говорят на английском, и так нормально. В крайнем случае вспомню слова из туристического испанского!»
2) Гнев: «Зачем нужен отдельный язык для страны, где всё население меньше некоторых столиц! Нелогичные слова, непонятные буквы с чёрточками!»
3) Торг: «Ладно, выучу "Bom dia", "Obrigado" и "Um café, por favor" – для соседей и…
Хочу чекап! С чего начать?
#чекап_novodoc
Начинаем с плановых визитов: когда даже ничего не болит и не беспокоит, но всё равно нужно, чтобы специалист заглянул в труднодоступные места.
1) Стоматолог всем, начиная с молочных зубов – каждые 6 месяцев. Плановая чистка, пересчёт пломб и восьмёрок, «рецессии десны» и прочая профилактика.
2) Гинеколог для девочек (ориентировочно с 20 до 60 лет): планово, раз в год, и па…
Новая рубрика, #чекап_novodoc
В последнее время большинство моих консультаций сводятся к одному запросу от пациента «Я, короче, решил(а), что пора заняться здоровьем. С чего начать?»
Начнем с понедельника, как положено)
По моим личным наблюдениям, «заняться здоровьем» делится на несколько основных блоков:
1 – «похудеть на 5 (10, 20) килограмм».
Потому что это самое очевидное – вот оно, неприятное зеркало и старые …
«PIGS — распространённое пейоративное сокращение, введенное в 2008 году экономистами и финансовыми аналитиками для обозначения четырёх стран — Португалия (P), Италия (I), Греция (G), Испания (S).
Сокращение соответствует английскому слову «свиньи» и демонстрирует крайне негативное отношение к финансовой политике этих стран в Еврозоне. Эти страны обладают таким крупным государственным долгом, что оказываются на грани…
👁️ Вчера было затмение. Как понять, что вы не сожгли сетчатку?
Если вчера вы поддались искушению и глянули на солнце без специального ISO-фильтра (или через обычные очки, фольгу, диски и темное стекло), сегодня важно внимательно прислушаться к своему зрению.
Главное и самое коварное свойство сетчатки — в ней нет болевых рецепторов. Вы не почувствуете ожог (солярную ретинопатию) в момент наблюдения. Глаз не заболит …
#реклама для родителей малышей, и просто красивый, современный и нужный проект, который приятно поддержать
🌙 NapCoach — AI-консультант по детскому сну для малышей 0–3 года
Отмечайте сны и кормления в пару касаний — дальше работает ИИ:
• Анализирует данные в контексте вашего ребёнка
• Строит режим дня и напоминает, когда готовиться ко сну и укладывать
• Советует как опытный консультант — по истории снов, кормлений …
❤20🔥6👏3🎉2💯2🥴2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @doutora_mariia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@doutora_mariia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👓 Да, экипировался! Достал специальные ISO-очки / фильтр46%
🕶️ Да, через пару солнечных очков / диски / фольгу (пару секунд же можно!)13%
❌ Хотел(а) бы, но спец-очков нет, а глаза жалко17%
🌍 Нет, в моей локации его не видно / облачно7%
📺 Посмотрю прямую трансляцию по телевизору / в интернете4%
🚫 Могу посмотреть, но не буду — я против системы!7%
Другое (и комментарии про ожог сетчатки)5%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doutora_Mariia [Португалия здорового человека]” (@doutora_mariia), 10,249 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doutora_mariia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.