Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 。・:𐋏ᥲɯ Бᥲ᧘κ᧐н 。・:

Channel

。・:𐋏ᥲɯ Бᥲ᧘κ᧐н 。・:

@dostogogolll01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

271subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002800554277
TypeChannel
Username@dostogogolll01
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dostogogolll01

Growth

2552712637 August 2026 — 255 subscribers7 August 2026 — 256 subscribers15 August 2026 — 271 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 253–273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:44271+15
7 Aug 2026, 10:28256+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:16255first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.0%
avg views ÷ 271 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,550
Reactions total227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

227 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54092838048943485519140.1%
custom 54092569613487491046629.1%
custom 54068957171784249973716.3%
custom 5188406861065375705219.25%
🕊104.41%
custom 522231734155925347720.881%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dostogogolll01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC29 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

подписываемся, подписываемся!!🤩🤩🤩

custom 54068957171784249972custom 54092569613487491042

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤍🤍🤍🤍 - Да, прости, задумался просто, - виновато улыбнувшись, ответил Достоевский. - Да? И о чём же ты так долго думал? - лукаво протянул Гоголь, хитро посмотрев на собеседника. - О Вашей красоте, сударь, о чём же ещё? - поцеловав тыльную сторону левой руки возлюбленного, ответил Достоевский, невинно посмотрев на него.

6 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC50 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 - Не боюсь, потому и скажу, - не отводя взгляд продолжил беловолосый. - Я хотел узнать тебя* лично. В народе много слухов противоречивых о тебе ходит, вот и захотелось узнать, каков ты, царь, на самом деле. - И как, узнал? - с нескрываемым интересом спросил у него Фёдор. - Узнал, потому и говорю тебе ничего не тая, - Яновский низко поклонился, а после сёл на колени перед царём, - я готов служить тебе верой и

6 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Небольшой деревянный домик где-то глубоко в лесу, рядом озеро с кристально чистой водой, а источником света выступают свечи и солнечный свет. Что ещё нужно для отдыха? По мнению Фёдора, только присутствие хашира¹ Свободы - Николая Гоголя, но сейчас он скорее этому не рад: слышать ужасный кашель любимого было невыносимо. - Попей, может, полегче станет, - не выдержав, Достоевский протянул ему стакан с водой.

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC54 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Здесь вы в основном найдете писательские работы по BSD (в основном фелаи) и не только, Эдиты и анкеты персонажей для разных AU, а также хедканоны, опросы и много чего ещё). Буду рада вас видеть)

4 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC110 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️🎀🎀🔪🎀🤩🎀🫠🎀🎀🍓 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🎀тв: убийство, расчленение 🎀 автор не поддерживает все что написано в работе представленной ниже. читайте на свой страх и риск 🔪 читать в телеграфе 🪓 🤩работа на ивент🤩 #Федор #Николай #Дазай #стекло #зарисовка #teenager

custom 540925696134874910424custom 54068957171784249979custom 51884068610653757058

30 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC229 views47 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🎃🤩🤩🤩🍵🤩🤩🤩🎃🤩 🤩🤩🤩 на улице уже начало темнеть. закатное солнце уже почти полностью ушло за горизонт, в последний миг окрашивая небо яркими красками. облака медленно проплывали изменяя свои причудливые формы. на улице похолодало, несмотря на теплое время года. обычный прохожий не заметил, но вот Федору пришлось застегнуть свою широкую кофту на молнию Достоевский шел после того, как его задержали

custom 540928380489434855128custom 518840686106537570511🕊8

28 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC208 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54092838048943485511

24 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC337 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤍 🖤ау в которой Гоголь живет🖤 🍷с Достом в разных городах🤩 #Николай #Федор #Сигма(упоминание) #переписка #хардкомфорт

custom 540928380489434855127custom 540925696134874910413custom 540689571717842499710🕊1custom 52223173415592534771

22 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC248 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️🌟⭐️⭐️ 🌟⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🦋 🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤩🤍🤍 - Федя, быстрее!! раздается звонкий голос в поле, усеянным нежными цветами. ветер разносит сладкий аромат цветений, а солнце висит где-то высоко над головой в голубом небосводе, согревая. звук шагов сопровождает громкое пение птиц, стоящих на деревьях, жужжание жучков в ярко зеленой траве. в гетерохромных глазах отражается это все и даже больше. в них можно увидеть не только

custom 540928380489434855125custom 54092569613487491047custom 54068957171784249975custom 51884068610653757052🕊1

21 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC189 views42 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 🥩🥩 решил сделать вам аватарочки пока вдохновение было на них. если вам понравится - будет ещё #аватарки #Николай #Федор #Сигма

custom 540925696134874910420custom 540689571717842499711custom 540928380489434855110custom 52223173415592534771

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dostogogolll01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 240,714 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“。・:𐋏ᥲɯ Бᥲ᧘κ᧐н 。・:” (@dostogogolll01), 271 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dostogogolll01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.