Channel
@dostoevskyquot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,473subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002192635470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dostoevskyquot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dostoevskyquot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 1,473 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 1,469 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 1,467 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 93.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
When you think you can love someone again... but Dostoevsky once wrote: “The price of loving someone very much is never loving anyone again.” https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075269515240157286
❤2
Pain and suffering are always inevitable for a large intelligence and a deep heart. The really great men must, I think, have great sadness on earth. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075170437982515523
To go wrong in one's own way is better than to go right in someone else's. #dostoevsky https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075103454779896219
❤3
On our Earth we can only love with suffering and through suffering. We cannot love otherwise, and we know of no other sort of love. I want suffering in order to love. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075101193269911977
Although your mind works, your heart is darkened with depravity, and without a pure heart, there can be no complete and true consciousness. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075079551097393383
Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, or Chekhov. Pick one. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075038492363510182
❤3
the deep satisfaction of reading dostoevsky books is still unmatched https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2075012069762482504
❤1
Man is sometimes extraordinarily, passionately, in love with suffering.. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2074989706815639610
❤1
What's one book you'd recommend to everyone? Fiction, nonfiction, philosophy. Tell me. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2074985140095189111
❤1
Dostoevsky hit me a little too hard with: ‘One never forgets the taste of certain tears.’ https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2074911656165913019
❤1
define ‘Dostoevsky’ https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2074906876571959715
I will not and cannot believe that evil is the normal condition of mankind. https://twitter.com/Dostoevskyquot/status/2074897348967190890
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dostoevskyquot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fyodor Dostoevsky” (@dostoevskyquot), 1,473 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dostoevskyquot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.